THE reason that CPTPP has digital provisions is because Japan wanted to ensure that other countries in its region didn't adopt the digital protectionism of China.
Cue a lot of people getting excited about digital provisions and how new trade deals are better with them, despite the fact they largely involve promising to not do something that nobody was going to do.
Cue Liz Truss going on about how we have modern trade deals because they have digital provisions.
Cue literally nobody explaining what the provisions actually do or how they help business, because would involve a very large magnifying glass.
If China signs up to CPTPP they sign away the very protectionism that the digital provisions were designed to prevent happening.
And it's major.
When Microsoft first launched its cloud service it ran sites all over the world except in China where they had to get a private company to run it because that was the law.
For digital, it's going to be huge if China drop its digital protections.
The only country where digital provisions really mattered and they look like they want to sign up to them.
If that's done we'll be talking about digital protectionism in the context of countries like North Korea.
Unless I've very much mistaken, this would free up the possibility of getting all these provisions done at the WTO.
I'm not sure they will actually join, but if they do, the biggest thing to come out of it will almost certainly be the death of digital protectionsim.
/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't know about you, but I'm beginning to see a pattern here. (Thread)
Boris Johnson admitted at college he did cocaine, and then said he wasn't sure what it was, and the said he didn't actually inhale.
Which is well known politician language for "I snorted my tits off".
Michael Gove has admitted he has taken it on several occasions, which in Gove language could mean anything from doing it s few time to heading a drug cartel and trying to push kids into taking smack.
And what a polished political line that "Indian Software Engineer" was.
Both appealing to people's Empire fetish and trying to pretend ending FoM was nothing to do with racism.
"We don't have to take" - We did have to take. Not because people were being forced onto us, but because we had the jobs to do the work that needed to be done.
In 1975 the problems with a “Buy British” campaign were clear. How do you establish what is British? What proportion is British? Is it branded British and foreign? Is it even available from a British company?
When Ireland started a three-year campaign on the 18th January 1978, they had thought about all of these problems and came up with intelligent practical solutions.
Belgium, Germany and the U.K have objected to our "Buy American" policies. They charge that "Buy American" is inconsistent with liberal trade.
(These include, I assume, the Buy American Act 1933 which is still in force...)
'Whiskey' in bottles.
"As a result of our strong pressure, KLM has not resumed flights to Havana which were suspended during the Cuban crisis. Our recent refusal to permit KLM chartered flights to carry Cuban refugees to the U.S. via Jamaica has irritated the Dutch."
If people insist a decision is going to be once in a generation, they shouldn't be agrieved when they are called out for their lies and ignorance for at least a generation.
Remainers were told if we leave we'll never rejoin.
People like Iain Dale literally said they wanted to make sure they were at least out because going back in would involve the Euro and the UK would never agree to that.