In all seriousness, DC politicians and related Galaxy Brains are the most worthless of all species when it comes to these questions. You can literally show these reptiles the raw data of how China does what it does, the companies involved, how this all breaks US law, 1/n
and literally invites the Chinese and Russian military INTO every sensitive sector and not only do these liberal arts major have no understanding of what you are talking about they don't even care even when you draw a straight line. The think tanks are too damned compromised 2/n
and have no idea about anything technical so unless it involves trying to write the next Kenan article or passing along juicy gossip from a meeting they could care less and dont have the intellectual depth to grasp what you are talking about anyway. Finally, US business 3/n
is second only to Chinese business to selling out American interests which give them sway over politicians and aides looking for board seats after retiring. Russian military inside US telcoms? I'm gonna need more share options. Think I'm joking? The next cave on telcoms is 4/n
Already in it just hasn't been announced yet because your leaders don't actually want to keep Russia and China out of basically every industry in the US, they want to come up with nice sounding PR but do absolutely nothing and the think tank industry stands behind this clownery.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Met Gala Balding 大老板

Met Gala Balding 大老板 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BaldingsWorld

17 Sep
I think the current state of journalism is awful because very few in the industry actually care about truth. It's 110% about selling a narrative and creating outrage. The Milley call to China is the PERFECT example of this. Follow me a second. 1/n
When it was first reported it was reported as part of an advance leak from a book (clue #1 to dig deeper). The initial report says Milley called around January 6th to tell China we would invade. Note how NOTHING revealed is technically false. It is so technically true 2/n
However, note as we proceed how by leaving out key facts it creates a very false picture of the actual events that intends to generate outrage playing to two different narratives. The first encouraged narrative was that Milley went rogue and yes the deep state was trying 3/n
Read 10 tweets
15 Sep
Here is an Evergrande feed about some sub-topics that I think are misunderstood or being poorly analyzed. First, I have seen many people and journalists talk about how China has pushed to increase risk acceptance by emphasizing market mechanisms. This is just false. 1/n
Journos typically take one of a couple of quotes like Xi saying "houses are for living, not speculating" but forget in addition to the towering mountain of data and evidence to the contrary, all the little signals Chinese investors and buyers cue on to make decisions. 2/n
For instance, probably 1/4 apartments in China sit empty and the pace of building (supply) far exceeds any remotely conceivable level of demand. Highlighting the overly cited Xi quote is akin to saying the Taliban is on the UN Council for Gender so women are doing fine 3/n
Read 12 tweets
14 Sep
So I get cranky at universities, professors, and galaxy brains who absolutely refuse to recognize how China is behaving or do anything about it. So let's go over some cases that I can speak first hand about where this is true 1/n
Elite east coast university with deep political meaning accepts $5m donation from Hong Kong shell company with $500k annually in revenue that is owned by corrupt Chinese real estate developer jailed for a decade connected to Politburo member 2/n
Front company for Chinese intelligence generating data classifying academics and think tankers by whether they are "important" including data about their family, research, and legal entanglements in their background 3/n
Read 8 tweets
10 Sep
As someone with a strong preference for policy compared to politics, I have had something gnawing at me about the differences between the the public behavior of the Trump administration compared to the Biden people. Let's start by saying both have more than their fair share 1/n
Of stupid stuff said andd stupid stuff done. However, it kept gnawing at me about howto summariz e or encapsulate the difference. Trump and his talking heads had a bravado so that even when they were slinging junk they were kind of like Biff from Back to the Future 2/n
There were many times they were slinging crap and they knew but flew into it for lack of a better term. They effectively challenged people to do something about but they carried this with some bravado. This is in stark contrast to the Biden people. I think the Biden people 3/n
Read 11 tweets
5 Sep
I want to say something as a full vaccinated individual whose family is vaxxed and would urge others to get vaccinated: I trully do not understand the absolute vitriol directed at people choosing to remain unvaccinated. This is just pure logic and science. Follow me 1/n
Let's take as fact based up all the data that corona vaccines work well in protecting recipients from catching corona. Let's take as a follow on fact that the number of break through cases (people catching corona while vaccinated) is very small. Let's take as a third 2/n
Follow on fact that the number of serious corona cases among the vaccinated is tiny. Statistically near zero. So basically: vaccines do what they are generally supposed to do. Here is the point: if you are vaccinated, what the hell do you care? Your risks from other 3/n
Read 5 tweets
26 Aug
There is a bad faith partisan argument being made the chaos in Afghanistan was inevitable so we shouldn't blame the Biden administration. This willfully attempts to muddy the waters about what problems were likely and which problems are preventable. So let's address them 1/n
They are right to some degree that when we left the government in a best case scenario was going to be shaky, democracy, and institutions left something to be desired, and the Taliban remained strong. This was likely under any scenario to set the stage for chaos whether 2/n
It was in 1 month or 6-12 months. No matter how we left Afghanistan there was definitely likely going to be a not insignificant degree of chaos in some form. That is accurate. However, that chaos & instability has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the preventable risks & chaos 3/n
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(