Is it time? ⏲️

I have been waiting *all day* to tell you the story of Sarah T. Hughes –

1st woman federal judge in Texas, 3rd in the federal judiciary as a whole, and the only woman to have sworn in a U.S. President (as you might recall). 👇

Let the thread commence...

(⚖️🧵)
Sarah Tilghman was born in 1896 in Baltimore. ☀️

After college, she spent 2 years teaching science - in her words, "about the only thing a girl could do at that time was to teach school."

She then enrolled at @gwlaw and attended at night, commuting by . . . canoe (!). 🛶

(2/x)
By canoe?! (you might ask). By canoe! (I say).

You see, Sarah lived on the other side of the Pataomac in a tent. ⛺️ And so naturally, she commuted by canoe.

And if all that wasn't cool enough, during this period she served as a member of the DC police force during the day. 👮‍♀️
During law school, she met George Ernest Hughes of Texas and the two married in 1922. 💒 They then moved to Dallas and Sarah joined a law firm.

From 1931-1935, she also served as an elected Texas state representative - newspapers called her the state's most effective rep! 📰
Then in 1935, the Governor appointed Sarah to the bench of the 14th district court in Dallas – making her the 1st woman state district judge in Texas! ⭐️

In 1936, Sarah was elected in her own right and would go on to be reelected 6 times (!) - the last in 1960. 👩‍⚖️

(5/x)
Those weren't Sarah's only experiences with elections . . . 🗳️

In 1952, Sarah received a token nomination for vice president during the Democratic Nat'l Convention.

She said: “I knew I had absolutely no chance, but it was doing something I would like to see more women do.” ☑️
Sarah was a big champion of women’s rights generally, and jury service for women specifically. 🙋‍♀️

In 1954, while still a state district judge, she was key (🔑) in the passage of a constitutional amendment that allowed women to serve on juries in Texas.

(7/x)
In 1961, Sarah asked Senator Ralph Yarborough and VP Lyndon B. Johnson to recommend her for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

The Attorney General (RFK) was not so keen on it, given her age – Sarah by this time was 65. 🤨

(She's a spring 🐔 to me!)
But LBJ was in Sarah's corner (as was 📢 of the 🏠 Sam Rayburn). And so President Kennedy appointed her in Oct. 1961, making Sarah Hughes the 1st woman to serve as a federal judge in Texas!

It would also make her the only woman judge that JFK would put on the bench . . .
She became a national figure after JFK was assassinated in Dallas in 1963 and LBJ chose her to administer the oath of office.

Sarah was preparing to leave for Austin to see JFK's speech that night when she was asked to come to Love Field to swear in LBJ aboard Air Force One.
Sarah went on to have a notable judicial career.

Her decisions upheld federal civil rights laws regarding equal pay for women and improved conditions for inmates in the Dallas County Jail.

She was also a member of the 3-judge district court panel to rule on Roe v. Wade in 1970.
Sarah took senior status in 1975 and passed away in 1985.

Reflecting back later in life, she said: “It all depends on whether you’re willing to work hard enough to get what you want, not what stands in your way.”

We salute you, Judge Sarah T. Hughes! 👩‍⚖️❤️

(fin)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marin K Levy

Marin K Levy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marinklevy

15 Sep
As you know, the Supreme Court Justices have had their current building only since 1935.

This leads to a gripping question: Where were those guys for the first 146 years!? 🤔

What do you say we take a little road trip together to find out? 🚗 I’ll drive . . .

(⚖️🧵)
First stop – New York City! 🍎

The Supreme Court was born in 1789 (thanks to the Judiciary Act of that year) and lived, ever so briefly, in the Royal Exchange Building right here. 👇

(It wasn't the fanciest of beginnings - the Royal Exchange was a covered marketplace . . . ) Image
Bonus Fun Fact: Before the Court convened, the federal court for the District of New York sat in the building on Nov. 3, 1789 – making it the 1st federal court to sit under the new Constitution!🥇

Their first business? Admitting lawyers to the bar, including Aaron Burr (Sir).⭐️
Read 15 tweets
22 Jun
I think everyone knows that Bob Katzmann was an extraordinary judge (👨‍⚖️) and a true mensch (♥️).

But do you know that he also made huge contributions to judicial administration? Ready to hear all about it? Well, have I got a court thread for you . . . (⚖️🧵) (1/x)
Let’s begin with a relationship problem – and the 2 players in this part of the story are Congress and the Courts (💕). Their problem, as with most couples, had to do with communication.

(Though unlike with most couples, theirs was all about judges interpreting statutes.) (2/x)
Specifically, as Judge Henry Friendly (❤️) once wrote about the “problems posed by defective draftsmanship”

(way to point the finger, Henry👉)

we see “the occasional statute in which the legislature has succeeded in literally saying something it probably did not mean.” (3/x)
Read 18 tweets
11 Jun
So today is my 40th birthday. 🎂 But enough about me! 😉 I want to talk about another birthday girl - this amazing woman right here, Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Amalya L. Kearse. (mini ⚖️🧵)
A little background: Amalya Kearse was born in @NJGov in 1937 to Myra L. Smith and Robert Freeman Kearse. Myra was a pathmarker in her own right – she was a physician, having been the only woman in her graduating class at Howard University College of Medicine. 🩺 (2/x)
Amalya attended @Wellesley, where she majored in philosophy. (♥️) She then went to @UMichLaw (Go Blue!) – where she was the only black woman in her law school class – and graduated cum laude and was on the famed @michlawreview. (3/x)
Read 8 tweets
24 May
On this week’s episode of Judicial History, I give you intrigue, I give you animosity btw judges, I give you a cameo by Alexander Burr, I give you romance . . . er, sorry, there’s no romance. But who needs romance when we have . . .⭐️The Origin Story of Visiting Judges⭐️

(⚖️🧵)
Let’s begin by setting the scene . . . 🎭

Each year most COAs are “visited” by other judges—district judges, other circuit judges, and judges from the Court of International Trade. These judges “sit by designation” and last year helped to decide over 3,000 cases. (!) 🤯 (2/x)
How did this fascinating practice begin? How is it that a judge who is nominated & confirmed for one particular seat can sit on another court and decide a case for that court? (E.g., how does Judge Rakoff, a judge from SDNY, decide cases for the 9th Circuit?)

- HOW? -

(3/x)
Read 15 tweets
15 Apr
Who is in the mood for a little judicial administration history? Everyone? Just as I suspected.

In light of the new bill to expand SCOTUS, a *big* thread on the relationship between the # of Supreme Court seats and the # of circuits. (⚖️🧵) (1/x)
Once upon a time, in 1789, Congress said "let there be courts." And so it came to be that we had 6 Supreme Court Justices and 3 Circuits – the Eastern, Middle, and Southern. (And then Congress rested. 💤) (2/x)
Now you might be thinking to yourself, 6 does not equal 3. 🙅‍♀️ To you I say, patience, my pet.

As you know, back in the bad old days of the federal courts, the Justices had to ride Circuit – and so 2 justices were assigned to each Circuit. But that math soon changed.... (3/x)
Read 16 tweets
11 Apr
@TheAtlantic has a new article, suggesting we should worry about the courts of appeals in 20 years b/c many Trump appointees will be Chief Judges and might manipulate panel assignments (creating more 2R/1D panels). This piece is *deeply problematic* and misreads my scholarship.🧵
The article begins by noting that in 2040 / 2041, many of the Chief Judges of the courts of appeals will be judges who were appointed by President Trump. That is an observation I and others have made. And that is important in some respects. (2/x)
As I talk about in my forthcoming article, "The Office of the Circuit Chief Judge," the Chief Judge has a number of important responsibilities. And that includes approving the calendar. This does not mean we should expect a whole swath of judges to manipulate that calendar. (3/x)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(