As you know, the Supreme Court Justices have had their current building only since 1935.

This leads to a gripping question: Where were those guys for the first 146 years!? 🤔

What do you say we take a little road trip together to find out? 🚗 I’ll drive . . .

(⚖️🧵)
First stop – New York City! 🍎

The Supreme Court was born in 1789 (thanks to the Judiciary Act of that year) and lived, ever so briefly, in the Royal Exchange Building right here. 👇

(It wasn't the fanciest of beginnings - the Royal Exchange was a covered marketplace . . . ) Image
Bonus Fun Fact: Before the Court convened, the federal court for the District of New York sat in the building on Nov. 3, 1789 – making it the 1st federal court to sit under the new Constitution!🥇

Their first business? Admitting lawyers to the bar, including Aaron Burr (Sir).⭐️
So when did the Supreme Court have its 1st session? Feb. 2 - 10, in 1790. 🎉

But honestly, it was a little awkward . . . city officials had to move the market’s butchers (🐄) and rope off the street so that the Court would be spared the “interruption from the noise of carts.”🙉
Next stop: Philadelphia!🔔

And actually, we’ve got 2 places to visit here. First up is Independence Hall. When the National Capitol moved to Philly in 1790, the Court moved, too! (So long, noisy carts! 👋)

Its chambers were first in the State House (aka Independence Hall).👇 Image
But the Justices didn’t get too cozy there!

The Court moved over to the Old City Hall at 5th & Chestnut Streets in 1791 (👇), and there it remained until 1800, when the Federal Government up and moved to DC . . .

(I’m telling you, the Supreme Court has been around the block!) Image
Final stop: DC! 🦅

So the Fed. Govt moved to DC in 1800 and Congress got its fancy new Capitol Building, but the Justices didn’t have a proper home because . . . *no provision had been made for a Supreme Court building.*

(Way to treat them like the middle child, Congress.) 😢
So Congress *lent* the Court space in its new building but those poor Justices ended up changing their meeting place 6 times while there . . . and that doesn’t count when they had to convene in a private 🏡 after the British set 🔥 to the Capitol during the War of 1812!

#drama
Highlights from the time our Justices were peripatetic?

With a few exceptions (recall the whole “War of 1812” episode), they were housed in what is today called the “Old Supreme Court Chamber” from 1810 to 1860.

(It has a vaulted ceiling that has been likened to a 🎃– see 👇) Image
Next up, after the Senate outgrew its quarters, the Court was given its old space in 1860. (Yep, the Supreme Court got hand-me-down chambers.👕)

Referred to today as the "Old Senate Chamber," Charles Evans Hughes called it “small, overheated & barren.”😡

(Judge for yourself👇) Image
So how did the Justices finally get a Court of their own?

After Taft became Chief Justice in 1921, he lobbied for the Court to have its own space – physically distanced from Congress – as an independent branch of government.

(We all have to leave the nest some time. 🐦)
In 1929, the government purchased the Old Brick Capitol (👇) – which was the temporary Capitol of the United States from 1815 to 1819.

That building was then razed to make space for a new building for the Court – one designed by Cass Gilbert (noted architect & friend of Taft). Image
There is much to be said about the Temple of Justice that was ultimately built. To start, not everyone was a fan. (Justice Stone complained it was "almost bombastically pretentious...Wholly inappropriate for a quiet group of old boys.")🧓

But we’ll save that for another day... Image
For tonight, I hope the next time you think of One First Street, you'll recall that it wasn’t the first home of the Court - indeed, that our Justices have inhabited other spaces for far longer than their current 🏠.

And for a little sibling, it did alright in the end . . .

fin Image
(P.S. Thanks for the road trip. Hope you enjoy our scrapbook 😉.

#IHeartJudicialHistory #appellatetwitter)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marin K Levy

Marin K Levy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marinklevy

17 Sep
Is it time? ⏲️

I have been waiting *all day* to tell you the story of Sarah T. Hughes –

1st woman federal judge in Texas, 3rd in the federal judiciary as a whole, and the only woman to have sworn in a U.S. President (as you might recall). 👇

Let the thread commence...

(⚖️🧵) Image
Sarah Tilghman was born in 1896 in Baltimore. ☀️

After college, she spent 2 years teaching science - in her words, "about the only thing a girl could do at that time was to teach school."

She then enrolled at @gwlaw and attended at night, commuting by . . . canoe (!). 🛶

(2/x)
By canoe?! (you might ask). By canoe! (I say).

You see, Sarah lived on the other side of the Pataomac in a tent. ⛺️ And so naturally, she commuted by canoe.

And if all that wasn't cool enough, during this period she served as a member of the DC police force during the day. 👮‍♀️
Read 12 tweets
22 Jun
I think everyone knows that Bob Katzmann was an extraordinary judge (👨‍⚖️) and a true mensch (♥️).

But do you know that he also made huge contributions to judicial administration? Ready to hear all about it? Well, have I got a court thread for you . . . (⚖️🧵) (1/x)
Let’s begin with a relationship problem – and the 2 players in this part of the story are Congress and the Courts (💕). Their problem, as with most couples, had to do with communication.

(Though unlike with most couples, theirs was all about judges interpreting statutes.) (2/x)
Specifically, as Judge Henry Friendly (❤️) once wrote about the “problems posed by defective draftsmanship”

(way to point the finger, Henry👉)

we see “the occasional statute in which the legislature has succeeded in literally saying something it probably did not mean.” (3/x)
Read 18 tweets
11 Jun
So today is my 40th birthday. 🎂 But enough about me! 😉 I want to talk about another birthday girl - this amazing woman right here, Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Amalya L. Kearse. (mini ⚖️🧵)
A little background: Amalya Kearse was born in @NJGov in 1937 to Myra L. Smith and Robert Freeman Kearse. Myra was a pathmarker in her own right – she was a physician, having been the only woman in her graduating class at Howard University College of Medicine. 🩺 (2/x)
Amalya attended @Wellesley, where she majored in philosophy. (♥️) She then went to @UMichLaw (Go Blue!) – where she was the only black woman in her law school class – and graduated cum laude and was on the famed @michlawreview. (3/x)
Read 8 tweets
24 May
On this week’s episode of Judicial History, I give you intrigue, I give you animosity btw judges, I give you a cameo by Alexander Burr, I give you romance . . . er, sorry, there’s no romance. But who needs romance when we have . . .⭐️The Origin Story of Visiting Judges⭐️

(⚖️🧵)
Let’s begin by setting the scene . . . 🎭

Each year most COAs are “visited” by other judges—district judges, other circuit judges, and judges from the Court of International Trade. These judges “sit by designation” and last year helped to decide over 3,000 cases. (!) 🤯 (2/x)
How did this fascinating practice begin? How is it that a judge who is nominated & confirmed for one particular seat can sit on another court and decide a case for that court? (E.g., how does Judge Rakoff, a judge from SDNY, decide cases for the 9th Circuit?)

- HOW? -

(3/x)
Read 15 tweets
15 Apr
Who is in the mood for a little judicial administration history? Everyone? Just as I suspected.

In light of the new bill to expand SCOTUS, a *big* thread on the relationship between the # of Supreme Court seats and the # of circuits. (⚖️🧵) (1/x)
Once upon a time, in 1789, Congress said "let there be courts." And so it came to be that we had 6 Supreme Court Justices and 3 Circuits – the Eastern, Middle, and Southern. (And then Congress rested. 💤) (2/x)
Now you might be thinking to yourself, 6 does not equal 3. 🙅‍♀️ To you I say, patience, my pet.

As you know, back in the bad old days of the federal courts, the Justices had to ride Circuit – and so 2 justices were assigned to each Circuit. But that math soon changed.... (3/x)
Read 16 tweets
11 Apr
@TheAtlantic has a new article, suggesting we should worry about the courts of appeals in 20 years b/c many Trump appointees will be Chief Judges and might manipulate panel assignments (creating more 2R/1D panels). This piece is *deeply problematic* and misreads my scholarship.🧵
The article begins by noting that in 2040 / 2041, many of the Chief Judges of the courts of appeals will be judges who were appointed by President Trump. That is an observation I and others have made. And that is important in some respects. (2/x)
As I talk about in my forthcoming article, "The Office of the Circuit Chief Judge," the Chief Judge has a number of important responsibilities. And that includes approving the calendar. This does not mean we should expect a whole swath of judges to manipulate that calendar. (3/x)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(