Economic growth can only offer, via deeply implausible future scenarios, an horrific 1.9°C-2.4°C future.
And if best estimates are wrong, it's 2.5°C-5.7°C climate hell.
Only postgrowth emergency action could aim for (still disastrous) 1.5°C-1.8°C.
A thread..🧵
1.
'long-term net-zero targets that have robust plans for reducing emissions by 2030 would reduce the uncertainty in temperatures beyond this year, and could limit heating to 1.9-2.0°C.'
A rapid postgrowth transition could keep us below 1.5-2°C this century unless The Devil's Bargain of aerosol unmasking and/or tropical rainforest collapse and/or Arctic sea ice destruction makes our predicament worse than already feared.
BREAKING: the UN has indicated that with today's plans for economic growth Earth's species will likely suffer profoundly catastrophic global heating of somewhere between 1.65 and 2 degrees Celsius by the 2030s
Where are the appropriate headlines?
There won't ever be any, not in state-corporate media anyway.
Extinction is driven by the whole global growth economy of industrial agriculture, logging, road-building, mining, war, etc
new peer-reviewed science: a temperature increase of 5.2 °C above the pre-industrial level at present rates of increase would likely result in mass extinction comparable to that of the major Phanerozoic events, even without other, non-climatic anthropogenic impacts
journalists:
1.
We're heading for somewhere between 2.5 °C and 6 °C with collapsing rainforests and Arctic sea ice destruction within decades on the current economic growth pathway.
BREAKING: Earth's 8.7 million species call for immediate system change
60% of primate species are threatened with extinction, 75% are declining.
Main threat: habitat destruction due to logging/agriculture.
Hunting, road construction, oil & gas extraction, mining, pollution, disease, and climate change are also key threats. theconversation.com/60-of-primate-…
40-60% of tree species are threatened with extinction.
more than half of species are only found in one country, suggesting vulnerability to potential threats, such as deforestation from extreme weather events or human activity.
"If you leave us at 450ppm for long enough it will probably melt all the ice - that's a sea rise of 75 metres. What we have found is that the target we have all been aiming for is a guaranteed disaster".
Our trajectory: 450ppm by 2032.
1. "if we follow business as usual I can't see how west Antarctica could survive a century. We are talking about a sea-level rise of at least a couple of metres this century."
2. Rapid transition to a postgrowth economy via careful, emergency, climate justice action is required now. It'll be extraordinary if we avoid 2C by 2035-2050 but we must try to limit the damage and protect everyone. Today's growth economy must go.
Editors and journalists are shamefully silent on the scientific projections that show without action on inequity billions of people exploited in poverty will face multiple high level food, water and energy risks from 2026-2035 due to ecological collapse and abrupt climate change.
1.
State-corporate media are busy protecting today's ultra-destructive global growth economy of which they are a key part and so only occasionally pay lip service to crucial ideas of climate justice.
It's not too late for fair, radical system change.