This is a common issue. When your DSCR doesn't hit the banks threshold (usually a ~1.25x DSCR), most people think banks don't give you any option but to lower the LTV. But in reality, if you negotiate, you have 3 options

Thread:
Option 1: Lower LTV
Option 2: Schedule an earnout once 1.25x DSCR is hit at implied ~75% LTV
Option 3: Fund reserves up front to artificially hit the 1.25x DSCR

Almost everyone goes with option 1, but it's actually the worst option by far. let's go through them one by one
For this entire thread, let's assume you want 75% leverage, but the bank is pushing you towards 60% leverage because that's the leverage that supports a 1.25x DSCR at the projected Yr 1 NOI
Option 1:

This is pretty self explanatory. The bank lowers your LTV (typically from ~75% down to ~60% or whatever LTV makes the DSCR hit 1.25x). This is the worst option by far because you have to fund far more equity up front, which creates a significant drag on your returns
Option 2:

An earnout occurs once you've hit the 1.25x DSCR at whatever LTV is pre-agreed upon. So say you have to start out at 60% LTV because your DSCR is too low. Once you raise the NOI to an amount that hits a 1.25x DSCR at ~75% LTV, the remaining 15% (75%-60%) is paid out
This is slightly more desirable than option 1 because the drag on your returns only lasts for a short period (a year or two). After that, your leverage is normalized to the level you desire (~75%), so it becomes a non-issue. But like option 1, it requires a lot of equity up front
Option 3:

This's the best option by far and the one you should be gunning for. Basically you fund whatever shortfall there is between the current DSCR and a 1.25x DSCR at 75% leverage to get the full amount of leverage. So if your Yr 1 NOI is $100k and your debt service is
$100k, you'd fund $25k to get to $125k NOI ($125k NOI/$100k debt service = 1.25x DSCR

This is the best because it requires the least amount of initial capital on your end (only 25% of the deal is equity from the get go vs the other two options that require 40% initial equity)
and the NOI plug to get to a 1.25x DSCR is generally peanuts in relation to the total dollar amounts of the deal

So, create a strong relationship with your bank and negotiate with them. Can unlock a lot of value simply by knowing what to ask for

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Real Estate God

The Real Estate God Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheRealEstateG6

19 Sep
Quick thread on underwriting in the current environment and why it makes sense to slightly de-emphasize exit basis for value-add deals in markets in which assets are trading significantly (~25%+) below replacement cost:
Typically, two of the most important aspects of underwriting are comparing entry cap rate to stabilized yield to market cap rate and comparing purchase price basis to stabilized basis to exit basis to market basis
But the recent increase in construction costs (and by proxy, replacement cost) changes things a bit
Read 9 tweets
16 Sep
Should always read a document from the perspective of who wrote it

Reading a loan doc? Pretend you're the lender

Halfway into the doc (from the context of the writer, tonality and language) you should be able to tell the intention of the document and almost predict the clauses
Actually makes a huge difference when you're reading more complex docs

Ex: a condo doc made by a developer who sold out of the project yrs ago. The intent of that doc was most likely to protect the developer in the short term - lot of the "teeth" of the doc evaporates long term
So really helpful to get into the mind of the writer

Why did he include this clause? What is that protecting him from? Is there anything he might have missed thinking with a shorter term perspective? If you were him would you have added in any other clauses? etc
Read 4 tweets
15 Sep
Think people go about choosing a market all wrong. RE investors make money on mispricings

Smaller mkt=less competition=less price discovery=more mispricings=easier to generate outsized returns

So your main criteria for a mkt should be "place with the least competition"

THREAD:
Most people will tell you to look for population growth, etc

But that just means more competition

If 15 firms are bidding on a deal (like in bigger/higher growth markets) there's no mispricing and only way you get outsized returns is if you're lucky or have a unique biz plan
So (as long as you're searching for short term flips) I would ignore all of those "population growth"-type stats entirely

The only stat that matters is finding a market that has the most mispricings. Everything else is essentially useless noise
Read 25 tweets
2 Sep
Since I've been getting a ton of DMs about the RE career path,

// DECODING REAL ESTATE CAREERS //: An in-depth overview of the career paths in the real estate sector, which ones you want to target and which ones you want to avoid
Read 6 tweets
20 Aug
Got some questions regarding the flow of funds in an RE deal

The flow of funds is actually determined by the lender, which is provided in loan docs. Then, the operating agreement will have a separate FOF afterward for "excess" funds

Lender FOF on the left, LLC FOF on the right
Cash Management typically occurs when a debt covenant has been breached (usually the DSCR or Debt Yield dipping below a required threshold)

Once this occurs, all cash is swept into a "lockbox" controlled by the lender and follows the "lockbox" FOF (rather than the normal FOF)
The Cash Management Period can typically be resolved by 2 consecutive calendar quarters above a specific DSCR or Debt Yield threshold, after which time revenue is no longer swept into a lockbox and the normal flow of funds resumes
Read 8 tweets
18 Aug
Majority of your yield is locked in at acquisition, which is why buying well is so important

Even an accretive, high return-on-cost action only represents a fraction of the purchase price - which is why having great deal flow (good purchase price) is so important

For example...
Say you buy a building for $10MM at a 5% cap rate, meaning the NOI is $500k

The building is 100 units and you plan on spending $1MM renovating it to increase the rents by $1,200/year in each unit ($120k revenue increase in total)
That's a 12% return on cost ($120k/$1MM) - which is pretty good, considering you bought the building for a 5% cap rate

After the renovations at the property are complete, the stabilized yield will be $620k/$11MM = 5.64%
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(