The State is not a viable instrument for protecting the planet.
Direct action, anti-state, and anti-colonial struggles have been doing the real work.
The State has just given us broken promises and repression.
Palm oil plantations blocked in Borneo. Pipelines stopped in North America. An airport cancelled in France. Coal mining slowed in Germany. Drag net fishing sabotaged in the Adriatic. Urban gardening and food sovereignty built up in racist food deserts from Durban to Atlanta.
Indigenous land recovered, restored, and reforested, and food sovereignty achieved in territory nominally occupied by the Brazilian, Chilean, and Venezuelan states. Forest gardens protected from greenwashed nature preserves and monocrop commercial forests in India.
These are the real struggles. Bureaucrats, academics, politicians, and professional activists not talking about and supporting these struggles are just trying to stay in power or use the crisis to climb the ladder.
(Can you tell I'm really anxious for my next book to be out? It's in copy editing with @PlutoPress and it's all about these struggles. Plus a lot of criticisms of the mainstream solutions, the racism of the "anthropocene" and "climate crisis" frameworks, etc.)
(And all the author proceeds are going to a couple of the movements that participated with interviews and advice. As long as I have a crowbar, I don't need to pay rent, so...)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brief (late) suggestion for an anarchist positionality in the pandemic.
*The line of conflict runs through the lives of people who are being hurt by the capitalist and statist response.*
That seems obvious, but we often don't stop to trace that line before acting.
A THREAD
Our battlefield is in the workplaces where workers don't have healthcare or sick days or safe conditions; in the hospitals neglected by the state; in the streets when people are punished for organizing on the job.
We should defend the survival of an expansive "we" through strike actions and mutual aid initiatives. The strike actions may temporarily rely on union structures, but they should point to a path of worker self-organization leading to a world without bosses or alienated consumers
All the polarization aside, I find myself in the middle on this one.
On the one hand the point that nearly the entire Left will get swept up in support of patriotic wars destroying years of momentum, whether it's 1914 or 2001, is tragic and true and we shouldn't expect otherwise.
Though I imagine CR doesn't go this way, for me it's another reason for anticapitalist and anticolonial movements to retain a historically accurate view of our relation to the Left rather than considering ourselves part of it. Because of its systematic role in these moments.
On the other hand those who prioritize movement building are obvs gonna be frustrated with this kind of flippant take because it decenters all the hard organizing and valuable lessons that were drawn from countless protests, port blockades, counterrecruiting campaigns, and more.
#OtD in 1936, fascists executed 4000 unarmed people connected to the workers' movement in Badajoz.
Also during these days, 15 years earlier, Spain began a massive campaign of mustard gas against rebelling Amazigh populations in their north African colonies.
Many thousands were killed, though there is little documentation and almost complete apathy across the Spanish left.
Even a focus on self-preservation would demand these atrocities receive more attention, since fascism begins in the colonies and then comes home.
The colonial war was a key stage in the careers of Franco and other future fascist leaders. But it seems unexamined white supremacy is stronger.
Please share this with everyone who is sinking into desperation:
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT URGENT.
It was urgent in the 60s, 70, 80s, and 90s. Now, tens of millions of people are ALREADY dying every year and species are going extinct at an unprecedented rate due to #ClimateCrisis
and all the interlocking ecological and social crises. The institutions sharing this narrative of urgency are the ones who did not take valid actions when there was still time, who even criminalized such actions while profiting off false solutions.
The reason they talk urgency now is not because they care about all the poor and racialized people who are dying or the unique habitats being lost, it's because they are afraid of losing power. They admit this quite clearly at Davos, at NATO summits, in their financial journals.
(Could my Marxist friends help me out with this one, because I feel like there's a pattern.)
#OtD in 1936, Durruti's column of armed workers marched out of Barcelona to take the key city of Zaragoza. They liberated much of Aragón in the first days but failed to take the capital.
In large part, this was because Communists and left parties made sure the anarchist militias, the greatest by number, didn't get weapons and logistical support even though this meant sabotaging the fight against the fascists.
Flash back to the beginning of the 20s when the International, effectively controlled from Moscow, began programmatically sabotaging workers' organizations they could not absorb, for example a worldwide network of dockworkers who leaned anarchist.
I think the rains are finally coming, which should be cause for celebration. But after 8 months with barely any, the earth is dust, and if we get strong summer downpours, so much topsoil is going to wash away.
The people who think we can maintain industrial agriculture with
1/2
just a few modifications, they really have no clue about the world we're living in. Unfortunately, they're the ones making the recommendations for the changes we need, from the UN, agribusiness (obviously), universities, and at the head of social movements in the Global North.
For those wondering about the connection: the monocrop machine harvests were brought in in June and the fields have been left bare and compacted to bake in the sun since then.
Commercial orchards also leave the ground bare between trees to facilitate machine-speed harvests using