We need to understand the social contexts of *why* we choose to have abusive leaders & why are they are so appealing if we are to create healthier cultures & systems of power. We need to understand this dynamic if we are to root out why our Christian cultures are often so blind.
Why are we addicted to toxic, abusive leaders in the church and in society? Why do we so readily put up with them?
I think ultimately we do so out of fear. We fear the social breakdown that we see all around us.
We cannot control the forces of politics, nature, religion that seem to steal away the good life we want so desperately so we turn to the "powerful."
We elect leaders who we feel can "protect" us from what we fear and dread. We elect the "powerful" to hide us from the raw evil we have unleashed into the modern world.
We elect the people that act like us if *we* had power.
We choose what seems solid and strong in a culture where everything is melting before us.
And so, we are more than willing to overlook the character flaws and godlessness of pastors, celebrities, and people in power who look like they are in the "right" so we can receive the benefits of their apparent strength.
We are willing to think the ends do justify the means because we have invested "our side" with messianic, salvific expectations of godlike proportions.
In reality, we have missed God and confused him with us and our side.
Another reason is the confusion of raw power and control for God.
Power is so often confused with the Sacred because it bypasses the hard work of vulnerability which can feel like intimacy but in reality it is only about control.
Control and power-lust are a false substitutes for love which we turn to from the fear of rejection and not being loved for who we are.
So it makes sense why we confuse power for God and use power to “do things for God” when in reality we’re trying to force people to love us and fill a void in our own hearts.
And so, we choose the seemingly powerful among us to protect us out of fear and b/c we think they can force everything to "work out" as we want.
We choose the abusive & powerful to force the world to love us on our own terms without needing to be vulnerable and sacrificial.
Without addressing these deep wounds and needs in our hearts and cultures, we will continue to fall for the power-trap and put such people in place. We will fall for them again and again.
I think that this is why pastors and leaders *must* find healing before going into ministry or positions of power:
"Today's Christianity is narrow-minded & selfish. One evil day it enlisted in the service of wealth and power, thus positioning itself over against the sick and the weak. The altar today serves only to protect the throne.
The priest has lowered himself to be an accomplice of the monarch, & the church has become a mainstay of capitalism. But original Christianity had an entirely different purpose. It opposed all competition btwn social classes. It wanted community & cooperation of its members.
It recommended harmony and love such as exist between members of the same body. If the Christian religion of today wants to regain its lost influence and become a blessing to society, its attitude will have to change radically.
I wanted to share part of my story and the #spiritualabuse that I experienced in seminary @wscal, in a confessional Reformed church, and in working for a Reformed non-profit.
Between listening to the podcast on the fall of Mars Hill, seeing the abuse around John Piper and his school, the doubling down of institutional support in many corners of Reformed Evangelicalism, and the continued retrenchment of white
supremacy in Christian culture, I’m so quickly reminded of the spiritual abuse and racism that I saw in my time in the URCNA (United Reformed Churches in North America) and at WSCAL and the White Horse Inn with Michael Horton.
What’s the common thread and theme that holds Evangelicals together in America? It’s the adoption of a political ontology of power that holds on to the American dream of Empire — whether they are baptist or charismatic or non-denom or confessional Reformed— that’s the linchpin.
The folks that stand out against this tradition are the anomalies, not the borders or keepers of this movement. Only those who have a distinct political ontology can withstand the pressures to fall in line with that. But not many have offered a different metaphysic robust enough.
Many pastors and teachers who have opposed this American imperialism thought that they could opt for a kind of “political neutrality”. In the end, this leaves congregants at the mercy of what news channel they listen to.
If so much of Scripture is poetry, song, and apocalypse, why doesn't our theology/teaching/preaching sound like that? We need to recover the mythopoetic resonances of Scripture since that is how we capture the imagination and how God chooses to reveal himself.
Liberals look at the mythopoetic aspects of Scripture, see that they are really there, but conclude the Bible cannot be true.
Conservatives adopt the same historical positivism and essentialism and conclude that these aspects can be literalized and quantified & therefore true.
They both adopt the false binary of myth vs. fact. Myth vs truth.
When in reality, God uses the mythical language to reveal transcendence and uses categories that are effulgent and apocalyptic to move us to awe and reverence before God who transcends our categories.