What’s the common thread and theme that holds Evangelicals together in America? It’s the adoption of a political ontology of power that holds on to the American dream of Empire — whether they are baptist or charismatic or non-denom or confessional Reformed— that’s the linchpin.
The folks that stand out against this tradition are the anomalies, not the borders or keepers of this movement. Only those who have a distinct political ontology can withstand the pressures to fall in line with that. But not many have offered a different metaphysic robust enough.
Many pastors and teachers who have opposed this American imperialism thought that they could opt for a kind of “political neutrality”. In the end, this leaves congregants at the mercy of what news channel they listen to.
Well-meaning & sincere leaders/pastors wake up with their people adopting that violent political ontology and rhetoric overnight. But in reality, it’s because they were never given the metaphysics of the Gospel. This method doesn’t work.
A political ontology of “neutrality” is what the Puritans and southern churches argued for to keep slavery and the empire alive.
Now that WASP establishment has died 2 deaths, we have seen the nostalgia and retrenchment re-emerge with a vengeance.
We need a distinct political ontology to awaken the church to its idolatry and complicity in violence and abuse of power in every corner of Evangelicalism.
What if the great divide in the church won’t be between liberal and conservative, evangelical or confessional, mainline or sideline? But what if the divide is between those who reject the worship of power/following the Cruciform Savior and those who try to worship mammon and God?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If so much of Scripture is poetry, song, and apocalypse, why doesn't our theology/teaching/preaching sound like that? We need to recover the mythopoetic resonances of Scripture since that is how we capture the imagination and how God chooses to reveal himself.
Liberals look at the mythopoetic aspects of Scripture, see that they are really there, but conclude the Bible cannot be true.
Conservatives adopt the same historical positivism and essentialism and conclude that these aspects can be literalized and quantified & therefore true.
They both adopt the false binary of myth vs. fact. Myth vs truth.
When in reality, God uses the mythical language to reveal transcendence and uses categories that are effulgent and apocalyptic to move us to awe and reverence before God who transcends our categories.
When it comes to thinking about #deconstruction in Christianity, Paul Ricoeur rightly argues for the creative and spiritual uses of Freud, Nietzsche, Lessing, et al. They are helpful on many fronts. They help us see what is “not God” and hear God more clearly.
They allow us to use a “small hammer” to tap the idols we are worshipping and hear their hollowness and emptiness. We need deconstruction as we learn to reinterpret the sacred texts and dogmas once again.
In interpreting a text, we will be forced to be disinstantiated from our Sitz im Leben and existentially re-emplotted by the Word, the Sitz im Wort, into the new world of God’s green country.
To truly be free from shame and guilt, to offer ourselves to others, to be open about our failings and strengths, first requires us to look at ourselves truly and compassionately. Openness, vulnerability, and courage are all based on self-compassion.
Self-compassion looks at ourselves as flawed & finite whose brokenness & neediness are not causes of shame. Sin brings shame & guilt but this is not inherent to who we are or our neediness. Self-compassion is rooted in God’s love for us as his creatures & as his redeemed people.
Shame and guilt are often intertwined in our lives and are hard to distinguish. The voice of shame tells us that we are our worst actions and evil deeds. Guilt positively tells us our actions are bad and sinful but they are not who we are. Sin violates who we are as God's people.
What we’re seeing w/ the “anti wokeness” policing and legislation coming from this evangelical and Reformed consensus is directly due to bad histories of modernity like Carl Trueman’s The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self.
These attempts at finding out how and why we are in this conundrum in the West downplays the role slavery, colonialism, empire, and racism had in building modernity. The modern mind is plagued with guilt over these sins by which the West became a dominant superpower.
The intentional misremembering of the past is how atrocities are committed in the present.
I think we have to say emphatically there’s a place for our emotions with God and each other— whatever they are. God wants us to come to him with all our baggage and wounds. He wants us, not an idealized version of us.
He doesn’t promise to immediately vaporize our sorrows or problems but asks us to lean into Him as the safe haven of home that will lead to healing and joy, many times without God removing the thorn in our flesh.
Our ultimate goal is healing from depression and anxiety but that might not come in this life. We can experience some relief through therapy or medication. And we can still experience joy and happiness and love while having mental health issues.