Seems like we're getting to a point where there may simply be two separate Americas: one where people choose or must take their chances with the virus (and unfortunately the healthcare systems around them remain in crisis) and one where norms are accepted to reduce COVID death.
And where those Americas happen to intersect, there may be flare-ups of confrontation (and crowded ICUs.) But for the most part, states, cities and businesses that choose norms and COVID reduction could well return to something approximating "normal" vs the "open COVID" spaces.
And if these variants don't slow down, what will that do to decisionmaking by corporations and industries as they choose where to locate? And what is the impact on tourism and on these states' relative economies? (States like Vermont are already advertising their high vax rates.)
The Biden administration is re-opening international travel. So do international visitors wind up feeling more comfortable doing a New York City/Broadway shows vacay or a trip to California or Vermont because those places are COVID-safer vs heading to Miami, Texas or NOLA?
We'll see. GA bounced way back with movie production this year after last year's COVID slowdown and a brief call for boycotts over their anti-voter law. But if Brian Kemp (who apparently thinks there's an AIDS vaccine??) keeps turning himself into a more DeSantis like governor...
Who knows. But it's a genuine question. Are we just going to have to live with two Americas: one where COVID sickness and death becomes endemic, and one largely emerging from COVID hell? We're starting that conversation tonight on @thereidout. Share your thoughts below!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When anti-vax, anti-mask people drone on about “freedom,” what’s unavoidable is that by definition they mean the “freedom” to get sick (and use up limited healthcare resources) and to infect other people with COVID. There’s just no way around that and I cannot understand it.
If your child is exposed to the virus and you choose to send them to school anyway, particularly unmasked, what you’re saying is you literally don’t care if they get other kids or their teachers or other families sick or even cause deaths because your convenience matters more.
The only other option is that you cannot financially afford to not send them to school, in which case we need alternatives like universal childcare, but with options to separate children who have had COVID exposure from other kids. Who’s gonna do that work and for what pay?
Thanks for the follow. Was tempted to not respond but since I know others believe this stuff, a few things: 1. "The government" didn't make these vaccines. Private companies (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson etc.) did. Though government certainly HELPED. healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hbl…
2. No one is forcing anyone to take the vaccines. It's just really risky and dumb not to, especially since they're free. And increasingly there are social consequences for choosing not to. That's perfectly normal. It happens all the time in organized societies, including ours.
If for example the Biden administration says federal employees or Pentagon employees have to be vaccinated for COVID, or private companies mandate the same, it presents those employees with a choice: get vaccinated, or don't work there. Choices have consequences.
The idea that taking your mask down or refusing to wear one and yelling/breathing in people's faces; and even COUGHING in people's faces, is a go-to protest for COVID deniers is both telling and disgusting. I can't imagine believing I have a right to force bodily fluid on people.
You have to wonder if these people also believe their rights are violated if they work in a restaurant and are instructed to wash their hands after using the toilet. Do they feel violated by having to wear shoes in stores? Shirts? There is no "right" to spread germs and viruses.
You can't walk around naked on the street or sit in a park starkers. You'd get arrested. Take that to a nude beach or accept the legal consequences. Your kids may have to wear a particular uniform in school. Seatbelts! There are all sorts of rules about what you put on your body.
Imagine teaching your teenage children to flout public health rules. Imagine these parents doing the same with measles, with your kids in that school. These families should be disenrolled. Those kids should have been sent home immediately or just turned away. Do better, people.
And that police officer should be relieved of duty. Why is he even there? Let one of those kids violate the dress code — shorts too short, wrong slogan on the Tee — they’d be out the door. If you’re gonna have a policy, enforce it.
UPDATE: So it turns out that after these MI parents used their kids to “own the libs” by risking their health and the health of everyone at that school, their kids wound up missing a day of learning in class anyway … to own the libs. freep.com/story/news/hea…
Police wink-winking the Proud Boys, in part due to a paranoia in these departments against the Black Lives Matter movement is unfortunately not a new thing. And that likely had implications for the lax preparation for January 6. usatoday.com/story/news/nat…
What will Texas Republicans empower private citizen bullies to do next, now that they've enacted laws letting (potentially armed) thugs "watch" (Black and Latino) voters, prompted Texans to spy on women and file lawsuits for a $ bounty against anyone helping them end a pregnancy?
Will Texans be prompted to spy on teachers to ensure they are not teaching the true history of slavery and are only upholding the prim dignity of the white founding fathers? How about urging citizens to inform on and sue parents who send their children to school masked?
Texas is basically a small Soviet Republic at this point, with neighbors spying on neighbors, hoping to collect a cash bounty, in addition to being an apartheid state for nonwhite voters. What woman or POC could possibly feel safe there? To say nothing of the gun proliferation.