I wrote a long account of the many frustrating efforts to first resist and then unify in resistance against Marcos, from 1972-86. quezon.ph/1996/02/25/the…
Here are two pieces that form a whole, on the topic of September 23.
Martial Law was a gamble. It was based on betting that people would not live up to the lofty words and expectations of our laws. Marcos proved this with his handling of the Supreme Court. quezon.ph/2014/09/22/sho…
To understand how and why Marcos gambled and remained in power for so long, requires understanding the secret to his popular support. quezon.ph/2017/09/11/spo…
Here is an exploration of how Marcos cultivated the support of parents who were dazed, confused, and resentful, about the 1960s and 1970s: news.abs-cbn.com/blogs/opinions…
By the way, music played a central role in Martial Law, that and other music items featured in my first podcast. anchor.fm/mlq3/episodes/…
What happened: September 21-24 in newspapers. A thread. From Richard Wilhelm Beltran Ragodon. Why Marcos wanted you to forget what was actually happening on Sept. 21-23.
1. September 21, 1972. Manila Times, Taliba, and Daily Express.
What happened: September 21-24 in newspapers. A thread. From Richard Wilhelm Beltran Ragodon. Why Marcos wanted you to forget what was actually happening on Sept. 21-23.
2. September 22, 1972. Reporting what happened Sept. 21, including the rally. Manila Times, Taliba,
What happened: September 21-24 in newspapers. A thread. From Richard Wilhelm Beltran Ragodon.
3. September 23, 1972.
a. The Manila Times*
b. An explanation of how some issues came out before the paper was shut down.
c. The Manila Chronicle*
*shut down by Marcos
Today is the birth anniversary of The Great Dictator who’s enjoying a posthumous rehabilitation primarily through online revisionism. The generations that disowned him have come to discover new generations cultivated to admire him. A thread of readings on what this says about us.
A reflection, on the centennial of his birth, on his life story being the incarnation, in many ways, of his generation's resentments: his success was considered a validation of a particular Filipino way of thinking and doing. quezon.ph/2017/09/11/spo…
Prepping materials for (possibly) my first vlog; some slides I have often used in presentations as exceedingly useful in discussing what we think people think when we think of how they think through their votes, a thread.
1. From "Vote of the Poor," the characteristics of a bad leader/good leader and what people claim influences them most in deciding whom to vote for.
Ateneo study, "The Preferred Filipino Leader: How do our current leaders measure up?" A kind of word cloud of feelings. After all politics is about feelings.
An interesting read, on the communication styles of Robredo, Lacson-Sotto, and Moreno, with the author making the case for Moreno being the successful communicator with a winning message. My own quick thoughts in thread. link.medium.com/KbonhYYOojb
First on Veep: the biggest obstacle was news on her didn’t/wouldn’t get out, and here media deserves scrutiny aside from the tactics of swarming her supporters on the part of the President’s people.
Second on Lacson-Sotto; it seems clear their angle is to pitch themselves as improved (calmer, more competent, not-wierd) version of the strongman leadership 2016 proved is a sizeable and energized constituency. Plus as senators they are proven vote-getters on a national scale.
My column today points out if there is one government office that has known what to do throughout this pandemic, and has done it successfully, it's the Vice President and her office. opinion.inquirer.net/143937/the-wid…