THREAD
My personal Dharmik belief system:
1. Like all major scriptures, I consider Veda Samhitas to be eternal knowledge of Eeshwar. Every other source of knowledge is acceptable to extent it syncs with Vedas
2. To interpret Vedas, I adopt the Nyaya Darshan method of 8 Pramana
+
My personal Dharmik belief system:
1. Like all major scriptures, I consider Veda Samhitas to be eternal knowledge of Eeshwar. Every other source of knowledge is acceptable to extent it syncs with Vedas
2. To interpret Vedas, I adopt the Nyaya Darshan method of 8 Pramana
+
3. Every way of worship is acceptable so far it doesn't contradict core Vedic principles like equal Dharmik opportunities for all. Hence I totally reject the anti-Vedic ecosystem that decides on right to Vedas and Janeu based on birth
+
+
4. Access to Vedas depend only on intent and capability, not on birth or gender.
5. Jaati by birth is a modern social concept and has nothing to do with Vedic Sanatan Dharma
+
5. Jaati by birth is a modern social concept and has nothing to do with Vedic Sanatan Dharma
+
6. One may choose to believe or reject Jaati by birth. It has no Dharmik bearing as it is a modern concept. But no Dharmik status or right accorded to a person is restricted based on birth
+
+
7. As per Vedas, monogamy is recommended. The rule has been flouted for ages causing problems.
8. Age of marriage is only after full physical, emotional, educational maturity has come. To base it on puberty is anti-Vedic.
+
8. Age of marriage is only after full physical, emotional, educational maturity has come. To base it on puberty is anti-Vedic.
+
9. Of all the methods of worship, the most empowering is way of Yoga as propounded by Yoga Darshan and Bhagwad Geeta. Other methods are ways to achieve this state. Because Moksha happens only when Avidya is completely removed via this Yoga
+
+
10. Triad of Jnana, Karma, Upasana must be balanced to have meaningful life and achieve purpose of life - Moksha. Everything else is waste of time unless it somehow propels in this direction
+
+
11. Some cults demand belief in things like Heaven, Hell, Prophet, Son of God etc. These are superstitions, against Vedas, and hence also against wisdom. Wise should reject superstitions and oppose any attempt to convert people into superstitions +
12."All faiths are equal" - this is a sweeping statement without any basis.
Only those faiths are equal that allow space to each individual to pursue his path of progress without fear of eternal hell or heaven. Other ideologies can turn fanatic threats to civil society +
Only those faiths are equal that allow space to each individual to pursue his path of progress without fear of eternal hell or heaven. Other ideologies can turn fanatic threats to civil society +
11. I reject in totality every faith or its derivatives that invaded other countries and tried to convert through force, miracles or money. To counter such predators and reverse their damage must be duty of every sane human being
+
+
12. There are faiths that do not explicitly believe in Vedas but are principally in same direction as message of Vedas. These are dharmik faiths.
Common traits of dharmik faiths are :
beliefs in karma, rebirth, purity, character, self-control, simplicity, self-realisation
+
Common traits of dharmik faiths are :
beliefs in karma, rebirth, purity, character, self-control, simplicity, self-realisation
+
13. Gauseva is a crucial element of my Dharma. That extends of Gauraksha as well.
14. I strongly believe in Jeeva Daya. We must all evolve to a cruelty-free diet to extent possible
+
14. I strongly believe in Jeeva Daya. We must all evolve to a cruelty-free diet to extent possible
+
15. I don't fight on basis of food or cultural habits. I propagate my vicharadhara though.
However coexistence with following Indians is impossible:
- those who insist on beef eating
- those who believe disbelievers will go to Hell
- those who pride in invaders
+
However coexistence with following Indians is impossible:
- those who insist on beef eating
- those who believe disbelievers will go to Hell
- those who pride in invaders
+
16. I thoroughly believe in Ahimsa. However the current prevailing meaning is totally wrong.
Ahimsa is defined in Yoga Darshan as having no malice (Vaira dhaava)
When a soldier kills terrorists to save innocents, that is Ahimsa.
To appease terrorists is Himsa (violence)
+
Ahimsa is defined in Yoga Darshan as having no malice (Vaira dhaava)
When a soldier kills terrorists to save innocents, that is Ahimsa.
To appease terrorists is Himsa (violence)
+
17. I believe in Satya as necessary for Moksha. However, again Satya doesn't mean to speak facts like a tape-recorder.
Satya means to do whatever is necessary at any point in time with most genuine intentions that furthers cause of Sattva (goodness) for samsara +
Satya means to do whatever is necessary at any point in time with most genuine intentions that furthers cause of Sattva (goodness) for samsara +
18. Four Purusharths:
i) Dharma = pursuing natural traits for greatest good of self and samsara in lines of Vedas
ii) Artha = collecting all necessary resources for fufillment of Purusharth (It is wrong to restrict it to mean only money)
+
i) Dharma = pursuing natural traits for greatest good of self and samsara in lines of Vedas
ii) Artha = collecting all necessary resources for fufillment of Purusharth (It is wrong to restrict it to mean only money)
+
iii) Kama = nurturing a strong desire or motivation to fulfil the Purusharth or project or goal
(Kama = sex is a modern wrong concept when used for 4 Purusharths. Kama Sutra is a fake medieval text)
iv) Moksha = Freedom from bondage is goal of Purusharth
+
(Kama = sex is a modern wrong concept when used for 4 Purusharths. Kama Sutra is a fake medieval text)
iv) Moksha = Freedom from bondage is goal of Purusharth
+
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
