Ten types of U.S. professionals endanger national security by handling dirty money, such as lawyers, realtors, portfolio managers, and art dealers paid by kleptocrats and oligarchs.
Based on those considerations, @USTreasury should strategically sequence a big regulatory rollout by the end of Biden's term, starting with easy wins (at the summit for democracy) before gauging whether there's political appetite in D.C. to fight the four horsemen of dirty money.
The key month to launch this mission in earnest is December. In addition to hosting the summit for democracy (Dec. 9-10), the U.S. government will finish Biden's anti-corruption plan (due Dec. 20). On Biden's order, it's supposed to cover the threat of professional enablers (⬇️).
Rather than limiting itself to statutorily mandated jobs like beneficial ownership and regulating antiquities, @USTreasury should show it means business by announcing at a summit for democracy side event that it'll be issuing new rules in 2022 to cover three sectors of enablers:
1⃣ Private equity and hedge funds
This is the enabler sector that the FBI is most concerned about as a covert financial pathway for adversarial regimes (left image).
@USTreasury should update the rule it drafted in 2015 with eight expansions (right image) and then finalize it.
2⃣ Real estate title insurers
From mobsters buying Trump condos to a warlord-oligarch buying office buildings in the Midwest, U.S. real estate is a world-leading home for dirty money.
@USTreasury should issue a new rule that would expand geographic targeting orders in six ways.
3⃣ Art dealers
When Russia invaded Ukraine and the U.S. sanctioned Kremlin cronies, email records suggest @ChristiesInc plotted to help the Russians evade sanctions by selling them art (left).
@USTreasury should reach six key findings in its coming study of art markets (right).
Unfortunately, even after regulating those three low-hanging fruit, the U.S. will still rank among the less than 10% of nations that are non-compliant with the @FATFNews standard on enablers.
Coming into compliance will require support from Congress to take on the four horsemen.
For example, the quarter-century Cold War (see image) between the @ABAesq and @FATFNews illustrates why regulating lawyers will require strong support and well-laid legal and political strategies, including advocacy tactics to divide and conquer opponents from within.
Similarly strong political support is needed to regulate covert PR and marketing firms, which Russia appears to use to launder disinformation against the Pfizer vaccine (left).
In fact, a rapidly growing portion of all disinfo cannot be attributed beyond opaque PR firms (right).
For Biden's sweeping anti-corruption campaign to succeed, ambitious rhetoric must be matched by strong implementation.
Having spent the past week thinking about how to regulate firms offering “black PR” (as in black ops meant to be deniable, like anti-vax disinfo from Moscow), I found this news of “white PR” to advocate for vaccination to be interesting and inspired. 🧵 nytimes.com/2021/08/01/tec…
Here’s the case that got me concerned about this influence vector last week. An secret funder in Moscow—whose identify was laundered by a PR front—paid YouTube influencers to spread disinfo that Pfizer vaccines kill, not disclosing the sponsorship. bbc.com/news/blogs-tre…
When the good guys start fighting fire with fire by adopting these tactics, it usually doesn’t work out too well for democracy. Take the Philippines, where it hasn’t helped Duterte’s opponents win elections, just normalized disinfo by competing PR firms. buzzfeednews.com/article/craigs…
The US-Germany deal on Nord Stream 2 has solid concessions by Berlin. We can all blame Putin, Schröder, Merkel, and others for this pipeline. By declining to sanction allies now that it's built, Biden leads us to stand together vs Covid, China, and climate.state.gov/joint-statemen…
1⃣ Ukraine gets at least $1 billion for green energy transition on top of other energy support.
2⃣ Germany expands its engagement with Three Seas Initiative with financial support for energy projects.
1️⃣ Germany and the US to invest $50 million in Ukrainian green tech
2️⃣ German support for Three Seas
3️⃣ Ukraine keeps getting $3 billion in annual transit fees from Russia
4️⃣ US can sanction future Russian energy coercion wsj.com/articles/u-s-g…
Woulda also liked a kill switch, reverse gas flows from West, extended Ukr-Rus gas deal past 2024, and German/EU commitment to join the snapback sanctions. But diplomacy is about saying “yes” to getting most of what you wanted, particularly when the issue isn’t your #1 priority.
The single biggest reason why we're stronger than Russia and China may be that we have many friends and allies in the world, not just subjects we try to dominate. And we have that because we treat them like friends & allies, not just pushing and ordering them around all the time.
Here are a half-dozen ways Congress can shore up U.S. defenses against Chinese malign finance. 🧵
1⃣ There's a provision in #S1 to broaden the definition of an in-kind political contribution to cover dirt on opponents or polling data (think Russia-2016), but it would not cover requests for investigations into opponents or trade targeted toward swing stages (think China-2020).
2⃣ 501c3's should have to disclose foreign funders. China has used proxies to set up friendly think tanks (in Australia) or US-based 501c3's (to facilitate bribery schemes and buy influence for the Belt and Road as far West as Czechia and Africa). See @Lancegooden's bill.
Includes the $191 million for FinCEN requested by Biden, a 50% boost.
This is great news—would be Congress’s strongest anti-corruption appropriation this year! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 docs.house.gov/meetings/AP/AP…
Credit also goes to @RepSpanberger, @RepAnnWagner, @RepMalinowski, @RepAGonzalez, & 34 others who urged appropriators to "significantly increase funding for FinCEN for FY22 ... to cost-effectively combat the illicit financial transactions that [threaten] U.S. national security."
If anything, the House approps markup and Senate process should push the number even higher. Gary Kalman and I argue in @ForeignPolicy to keep it simple and follow Rep. Charlie Wilson's famous order about funding CIA operations in Afghanistan: "Double it." foreignpolicy.com/2021/04/01/fin…
"FinCEN is tasked with building a massive database that collects and secures beneficial ownership information, but Congress has not yet provided any funding to do it."
Dramatically increasing funding for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is by far the single most important thing Congress can do this year to fight corruption.
Here's a letter from @RepSpanberger, @RepAnnWagner, @RepMalinowski, @RepAGonzalez, and 34 others urging appropriators to "significantly increase funding for FinCEN for FY22 ... to cost-effectively combat the illicit financial transactions that [threaten] U.S. national security."