1/ Let's play a little game for this post-election day.
What if we superpose the major planned or under construction transit projects in the Greater Montréal to the provincial and federal electoral maps?
An entertaining thread (with some political insights)
2/ Let's start with the REM, the Réseau Express Métropolitain, that we can possibly call the REL - Réseau Express Liberal-o-tain, as it is designed to hit perfectly a full jackpot of Liberal strongholds both at provincial and federal level
3/ The REM de l'Est, a creature of the current government, hits the sparsely populated but CAQ/BQ dominated East Island tip. It's somehow a REM-d'la-CAQ, especially the eastern leg.
The reason it brush past some Québec Solidaire circonscriptions is just b/c they are on the way.
4/ Let's go to the REM extensions under consideration. The unviable southern one reaching far out in the Montérégie was clearly an electoral "boutade" from the CAQ.
The ext. to Laval (alignement still uncertain) goes into suburban territory where the CAQ can hope to make gains
5/ Southern shore: the something something "structurant" something along Taschereau boulevard, currently being studied by CDPQ Infra. It crosses both liberal and PQ-turning-CAQ/BQ territory. Enough to make everybody happy and willing to go forward
6/ Let's go to the eternal Godot of transit projects in the CMM: the blue line ext. It crosses through immigrants dominated liberal and QS strongholds. No surprise that the current provincial government seems to be getting under the project's feet.
7/ Finally, the long-promised "something-on-rail" to the Sud-Ouest and Lachine, for the moment nothing more than a line on a map and $ 800 m set aside. It crosses through mostly liberal strongholds in Westmount, CDN-NDG and Lachine/Dorval. No surprise it's lagging behind.
8/ Final note: I'm actually not implying anything serious, and this was only a funny game, but since transit planning is very political in Canada, there are some parts of truth in this thread ;-)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the various criticism against the REM is the fact that it will take over the Mont-Royal tunnel, the only route that allows through running via the Gare Centrale, notably for ViaRail High Frequency Train.
I think this criticism is not completely fair. I'll tell you why.
A premise: I've criticized the REM project at length on what I think are several shortcomings in the planning and implementation phases, but I don't want to be hostile to the project aprioristically and just relate taken-for-granted opinions.
Let's imagine that Montréal, instead of doing the REM, took the RER GO approach: transform its infrequent commuter rail network in a modern, electrified, frequent S-Bahn. Let's just forget for a second all the issues with CP,CN, the bridges etc.
A couple of consideration about transit spending for operation in Italy, following @yfreemark 's piece about the US
In Italy, public subsidies amounts to € 6.6 bn annually (2017), but mostly comes from the "federal":
Central govt -> € 4.8 bn (72%)
Local govt -> € 1.8 bn (28%)
That covered some 2 bn in vehicle*km of service (incl. bus/tram/metro/train/ferry), for 5.2 billion passengers, for a total costs (subsidy+fares) of € 11 bn divided as 7 bn for urban transit (4€/vehicle*km) and 4 bn for rail (15.5€/train*km), the rest for ferry
note that that data is uncomplete, though. It covers only the regions with "ordinary statute" and not the four regions with autonomous statute and the two autonomous provinces, that encompass a little less than 1/6 of the population
1/ This is a short, mostly visual thread about a great piece of urbanism: Turin's multiway boulevards.
🏢🌳🚲🌳🚊🚘🚘🚊🌳🚲🚙🌳🏫
2/ multiway boulevards are one of the most interesting invention of 19th c. city planning, a first attempt to create thoroughfares to facilitate circulation in growing "paleo-technic" metropolis
In Italy, Turin is the city that designed its growth around them more than any other
3/ taking various shapes, width and configurations, most of them have an important feature: planted medians sepatarating through traffic of trams/cars from side local acces lanes intended for local slow traffic, parking.
1/ A while ago I promised to write a thread about why zoning is not the only (maybe not even the main) obstacle between us and the 15-minutes city, starting from my grandmother "latteria".
Today I deliver : a thread about commerce, logistic and city planning.
2/ Let's first start with Granma's Latteria, that she opened in 1959. It was a small neighborhood shop, technically a "milk shop", but more of a small grocery + cheese shop + bar in a secondary residential street within a small cluster (tobacco, butcher and vegetable shop)
3/ It was a typical family business, run primarily by nonna Giovanna with occasional help from grandpa during weekends and by my father and my aunt after school, especially for home deliveries by foot or bike
Quite the typical portrait of a neighborhood shop in the postwar years
1/ Québec just announced it is going to pour $10bn and counting in a what is now called the Réseau Express de la Capitale.
- $3.3bn will go toward the tramway project (20km)
- $6-7bn toward a 8km road tunnel (with bus lanes...)
- $600m for bus lanes and other improvements
2/ The tramway project is more or less the same announced a few years ago, albeit with a different Eastern terminus.
Unfortunately, the project lost the rest of the "Réseau Structurant" network it was part of, that comprised BRT, bus lanes too. But budget remained the same...
3/ $3.3bn for 20 km makes it $165m/km, one of the costliest tramways in history.
The average cost for Modern European Tramways Québec one is modeled from is around €30-40m/km
-> $50-70m/km
The short central tunnel section alone does not justify that astronomical budget, IMO