A lot of injustice occurs below Franzen's threshold for caring:
“There’s a chilling of nuanced discourse…but I also think, until people start being sent off to Lubyanka for having said the wrong thing to the wrong person, the risk is probably overblown”
He seems to overlook the fact that he is one of the very few writers big enough to ride out the type of mobbing and slander he himself has faced. He'd have been cancelled several times if he weren’t in a particularly privileged position.
Unlike Malcolm Gladwell or the other big names who signed the letter, it's pretty disappointing someone of his stature and talent doesn't want to think harder now about this issue or from a different vantage point.
It seems like there's a growing elite fatigue in being bothered about this stuff. A desire not to think about it anymore (and then it will go away?) until it *really* gets out of control. But that would be a rather late point at which to begin drafting the open letters, etc.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We have spent the past few years debating how oppressive the U.S. is. These images of Afghans clinging to a U.S. plane and falling from the sky are a damn sobering reminder that while there are no utopias, we'd better appreciate the society we were lucky enough to be born into.
I'll expand this beyond the U.S. I have had conversations with well-to-do Parisians this past year who have said with a straight face that President Macron is "authoritarian," "a tyrant." Let's get some perspective.
If you're lucky enough to be born into a prosperous democracy that isn't dependent on the whims of a foreign presence to keep the forces of chaos and murder at bay, you ought to be critical when necessary but also deeply grateful for the present without being stuck in the past.
I've recently fallen afoul of both a kind of conservative Twitter (for NYT op-ed against CRT bans) and a kind of social justice Twitter (for assorted wrongthink). Both attacked, but I say this seriously––only a part of "woke" Twitter tried to criticize my physical appearance.
It's only anecdotal experience, but it seriously makes me wonder what kind of progress these "progressives" believe they're fighting for and why they believe their ends can justify any kind of nasty means, which, in theory, they would say they're against.
Conservative Twitter gets angry for sure, but only woke Twitter will be like, "the way you are holding your glass of wine is so stupid." LMAO
Around 27 minutes in, Kendi's reasoning just becomes tortuous.
Who is the "we" here? Who decides the impact of every policy on one abstract identity group against the imagined interest of another? Who says: "This is in the Latino interest"; "This is in the black interest"?
Then when Klein gently but somewhat insistently pushes about whether defunding the police is in the black interest or not, Kendi gives a series of convoluted and unsatisfying answers. Hard to believe such deliberation can work on every single law and policy going forward.