I started noticing this trend of TikTokers obsessively following Nancy Pelosi's stock trading disclosures -- and fell into this crazy world where retail investors are mimicking Congressional stock trades:
This isn't a one-off or a fad: people really are buying stocks based on what they see in House/Senate stock disclosures, per research done by a prof at Augusta University.
He found stocks prices got a bump after purchases were disclosed by Congress
So far this year, Senate and House members have filed more than 4,000 financial trading disclosures — with at least $315 million of stocks and bonds bought or sold, per @tcarambat
@tcarambat The surge of interest in retail investing that happened at the beginning of COVID combined with the flurry of stories about alleged insider trading happening in the Senate...
... leading to obsessing over whether members of Congress are trading based on insider info.
@tcarambat There's a deep cynicism that forms the foundation of a trading strategy based on mimicking the stock picks of lawmakers and their spouses.
So the question is before Congress: should lawmakers even be allowed to own individual stocks?
@tcarambat The interesting this is that there is mixed research on whether lawmakers are good stock-pickers. A study in 2004 said yes. More recent research says no.
NEW: With dozens of alleged Proud Boys members charged for Jan 6 actions and news that he had been a federal informant National Proud Boys chairman Enrique Tarrio tells me he'll be stepping down from that role in September.
Enrique Tarrio confirmed that he did run a t-shirt business that sold 'Black Lives Matter' merchandise, claiming this not as a sign of financial desperation but a sly prank in which Proud Boys earned beer money through BLM t-shirts
NEW: A federal judge has dismissed the NRA's bankruptcy case, finding that the NRA was just using the bankruptcy as a vehicle to avoid the New York AG's attempt to dissolve it for alleged corruption
The federal judge said the NRA did not file the bankruptcy case in good faith, and "agrees with the NYAG that the NRA is using this bankruptcy case to address a regulatory enforcement problem, not a financial one."
The end result in this effort to avoid the New York AG?
-NRA spent millions of dollars on a bankruptcy trial (they've spent $72 MILLION in less than three years in legal fees)
-Their embarrassing dirty laundry is aired for the public
One thing you notice from the video is how panicked and incompetent Wayne LaPierre seems with a firearm despite some 40 years with the NRA.
After several attempts at killing an apparently wounded elephant at near-point blank range, Wayne LaPierre continually misses the target his guide is directing him towards.
There was a big sign at Fort Jackson warning sergeants:
'Lose a Rifle, Lose Your Stripes' -- meaning a very serious demotion and other dire consequences. It is among the worst things a soldier can do out of negligence in a garrison setting
Here's a great piece explaining why:
"Short of actively committing a crime, in the peacetime US military the worst thing a soldier can do is lose a weapon"