Bc we’re so bad abt thinking about class in the US, all the “Trump won non-college educated whites” post-mortems took that to mean his base was poor + working-class white folx and not, like, the dude who clears six figures + owns the car dealership or has a small contracting biz
His rise wasn’t fueled by the Tim Rigginses and their brothers. It was fueled by the Buddy Garritys.
To zoom out from the Trumpers: a labor organizer working on a living wage campaign said the most dogged opposition came from Black fast food franchisees who framed the campaign as “an attack on Black entrepreneurship”
When she told me that, it made me think of @DrMChatelain’s book, “Franchise,” but again, about the overlooked power of the petit-bourgeoisie
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Someone close to me tested positive for COVID after a colleague of theirs who refuses to get vaccinated tested positive. That colleague works with children — when their parents find out said colleague is not vaxxed, it’s going to get ugly.
Now everybody’s lives are up in the air: arranging for childcare while quarantining, contacting everyone *they’ve* been in contact with who might have to make similar arrangements.
the wild part is that nothing about this freakout over curricula is novel. In the 1930s, there was a organized campaign by conservative activists against a set of widely used textbooks bc they acknowledged things like the existence of racism in US history and wealth inequality.
At one point, a powerful advertising lobby group got in on the controversy, taking issue with those social studies textbooks bc one included the phrase “advertising costs were passed on to the consumer.”
They said it disparaged USian marketing.
As @adamlaats told us, in some places, they took to just burning these social textbooks. (This was the 1930s, so those activists clearly didn’t think through the contemporary parallels in Europe to these book-burning campaigns.)
Never heard of LulaRoe until v recently. There’s a LOT of race stuff in MLMs. (the way i heard target sellers described was “Mormons, [stay at home] moms, and minorities”: people with tight, cooperative social networks + constrained avenues to lucrative employment/compensation
This doc shows just how white the LulaRoe universe is. But that makes sense, right? These are Mormon and evangelical stay-at-home moms who are pumping their friend and family circles for sales. Even at five or six degrees removed, how many WOC are they likely to *know*?
And that white woman-ness in the network effects is embedded in the branding: even if them leggings were not hideous, they’re going to be received as vaguely MAGA-ass fashion.
They don’t have the credibility to rubber-stamp those tights as cool to people who ain’t them.
this is a wild dynamic that shows up in so many of these testing studies re: housing discrimination. In these cases, "testers" pretend to be looking for a home or a house to rent, and the property managers are often *nice* to the tester they have no intention of ever renting to.
a few years back, Urban Institute did a study like this, where they sent "testers" to inquire about homes to rent/buy. They sent white testers and testers of color, w the same financial credentials. They did this thousands of times across more than two dozen cities in the US.
and this drop is true of nearly every big city in the US – homicide and violent crime rates have PLUMMETED over the last two decades, and at or near record lows in some places. but if you watch local news (or read Nextdoor) you might think it's Mad Max out here.
as @loisbeckett said, when the baseline is that low, any small increase in violent crime can look like a spike year over year.
it's a very politically useful innumeracy — hard to make an argument for rethinking budget priorities around, say, policing if crime is "skyrocketing."
on our neighborhood Nextdoor, a police captain posts these context-less crime incident reports and commenters are always like "what is happening to/in our neighborhood?"
it's a good q, but not for the reasons they ask. who are the most likely victims?(it's not ppl on nextdoor.)