Thread by @AlexEpstein

Here we go, @KHayhoe evades my points about her bad methodology, won't debate, says I need to write in a journal.

1) Read me in Energy Law Journal:
eba-net.org/assets/1/6/17-…

2) My book, based on primary sources, is much better than a journal article.
amazon.com/dp/B00INIQVJA

1/6

If @KHayhoe will only read a peer-reviewed journal article refuting climate catastrophism, she should read this one by @BjornLomborg, including:
"Arguments for devastation typically ignore adaptation, which will reduce vulnerability dramatically."
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

2/6

Anyone who is actually interested in thinking about the issue of energy and climate rationally, instead of hiding behind peer-/pal-reviewed journals--a practice that would have suppressed much of scientific progress--read what I wrote to @KHayhoe.

https://twitter.com/AlexEpstein/status/1441112998546853897

3/6

If you want to see what happens when an academic tries to refute me, read both the attack of The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels in Energy Law Journal, then my response.
eba-net.org/assets/1/6/24-…

eba-net.org/assets/1/6/17-…

4/6

On 2/22/22, Fossil Future comes out. It will clarify every aspect of energy and climate issues, and demonstrate in detail that the for climate catastrophism and fossil fuel elimination is based on anti-human religion, usually held subconsciously.
amazon.com/Fossil-Future-…

5/6

If you want to see how today's public climate scientists deal with criticisms from other scientists, watch my new podcast with physicist Steve Koonin, entitled "The Pseudoscientific Smearing of Steve Koonin."


6/6