I've got music tonight so this will be brief.
Three and a half to four years ago I believed the same thing everybody else does about climate change, wind turbines, solar panels, and the whole high energy high tech high speed solution to climate crisis. Not quite exactly, but...
I used to have articles online, but that website is broken and I don't care enough to fix it.
But I mostly believed it.
Then for no particular reason except it's how I think, I started trying to project manage the project.
I did a lot of big projects in my working life.
Take an empty two story concrete hospital in a country town, and turn it over to its owners with a complete functioning telephone and newtork on opening day.
Design the parts, bore the holes, run the cable...
Buy the cable, transport it, physically install it below floors,
4. above ceilings, behind walls, where nobody can see it but the electronic wonders do their magic for the people who sit in front of them, nurses and doctors, billers and registrars, record keepers and housekeepers.
Complex systems from design to turnover including labor.
5. I spent my entire life behind doors that say Do Not Enter, under desks, and over ceilings. So, if I was going to take the whole United States and build a complete renewable overlay, I would...
I would...
I would...
Holy shit.
It's not possible.
The resources to build something
6. of that scale and scope do not exist and there is no possibility Earth can survive us ripping them out of her.
7. If you want electric cars to replace 2-3 billion light cars and trucks worldwide you want this mine and quit sniveling about it.
8. And if your plan for the climate includes space for the largest new highway plan in at least 50 years - and yes, that's what its proponents say - if your climate plan has room for that it's not a climate plan. It's a suicide pact.
Anyway, I'm going to drive a hundred mile
9. round trip tonight in a Subaru Forester, at 5 mph below the posted speed limit, to play guitar for two hours and drink two beers with a friend from fifty years and more ago, there to here, still jamming, and do the best I can. We're all caught in it.
Best, my friends.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff McFadden

Jeff McFadden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @homemadeguitars

27 Sep
2. This is *the only way* to fight climate change. It requires slowing from "developed" speeds to food energy speeds as a component.
Not "renewable energy".
Less energy.
3. It is not only not necessary for societies to operate on high energy and speed, for the majority it is no improvement whatsoever, not if measured in mental and physical health and an overall sense of well-being. More stress, more danger, more anger, more required actions.
Read 18 tweets
27 Sep
I've been hesitant to tell this story. It sounds like boasting. This is not about me, and I don't want to be told how great I am. This is about other people.
2. On Friday night I drove up to Kansas City to jam with an old friend, as I often do.
I used to always give money to panhandlers on street corners, because I never had a job that miserable.
But the pimps ran all the homeless people off, and installed their older worn-out hookers
3. as panhandlers.
I feel sorry for the hookers, but I don't give money to pimps.
(Don't ask me how I know. I've lived my life on the edge of small-time crime and I know how it works and who's doing what.)
Read 8 tweets
26 Sep
I've had this other story about my current favorite graphic I wanted to tell, and I'm done with my day's obligations, so... Image
The most common question, or expressed confusion, I get about this graphic is the waste energy. Like, howcum? Is this best we can do?
Out of 100.2 units of energy, we piss away 67.5 and only get use of 32.7?
WHY???
Coz physics.
It's a damn shame,too. Image
2. What's weird is, you already know this, and you know why. It's hiding in plain sight.
Do you own, or have you ever been exposed to, a car, or a lawnmower?
Let's start with the car.
Unless is was a particular oddball, it had a radiator.
Why?
To reject energy.
That's it.
Read 34 tweets
23 Sep
I wrote the thread below tonight. I have some comments on it.
First, the reason I explained in terms of government action is the same as the reason scientists use "perfect" media to explain processes and principles.
Perfect gas. Perfect black body radiation. So forth.
2. The real world is stark staring crazy, the home of chaos and variables. If you want to explain an idea you kinda leave some of that out. It's too confusing.
But it's real, and it's not smart to ignore it.
So, I developed societies were really to slow down, could they?
3. I don't know. I'm not at all optimistic they will, so if there is no free will, then no, they couldn't.
And that's way over my head.
In terms of hardware and grocery stores it theoretically could, by people doing it from the bottom. Refusing to maintain the average speed.
Read 15 tweets
22 Sep
I got this question tonight, from a gracious near-stranger who moved past me being a jerk. I want to publicly thank and answer her. My plan: slow down systematically.
First the mechanics:
Governments nationwide accept the fact that the only way, under the laws of physics, to reduce emissions today is to reduce energy throughput today.
Today, in the real world, we have exactly what we already have in energy sources.
3. I propose that the only realistic means to address climate change and the overarching ecosystem catastrophe is to reduce emissions and energy throughput today. If you'd like to hear a well reasoned lecture on my reasoning, from someone else who agrees independently,
Read 29 tweets
22 Sep
I'm reading this excellent article that my friend Midnight sent me, and right in the middle I stumble onto this concept
As regular readers know, I harp endlessly on the energy and resource cost of the "renewable energy" something for nothing solution to everything, and it falls on deaf ears.
And here's why:
Our definition of renewables is that they are free, they have no cost, they obtain energy which the ecosystem was otherwise wasting, which is by itself an insane belief.
But I'm saying, no, look, it takes all these material resources, steel, glass, and it takes energy to make
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(