I've had this other story about my current favorite graphic I wanted to tell, and I'm done with my day's obligations, so... Image
The most common question, or expressed confusion, I get about this graphic is the waste energy. Like, howcum? Is this best we can do?
Out of 100.2 units of energy, we piss away 67.5 and only get use of 32.7?
WHY???
Coz physics.
It's a damn shame,too. Image
2. What's weird is, you already know this, and you know why. It's hiding in plain sight.
Do you own, or have you ever been exposed to, a car, or a lawnmower?
Let's start with the car.
Unless is was a particular oddball, it had a radiator.
Why?
To reject energy.
That's it.
3. A car can't turn all the heat that's available by burning petroleum into motion. It can't even come close.
The heat that heats up your radiator is rejected energy.
The heat that comes out your tailpipe is rejected energy.
The noise your car makes is rejected energy.
4. The reason you can't open the hood and grab the exhaust manifold is rejected energy.
There is some certain quantity of energy, in the form of chemical energy, in gasoline. The way we make use of this energy is by converting it to heat. We burn the gasoline. Moves the energy.
5. Energy can be neither created nor destroyed. First law of thermodynamics. But it can be converted from form to form. It can be applied to matter which the energy must move, and in the process entropy increases, and some energy becomes unavailable to do more work. Still energy.
6. The chemical energy in the petroleum arrived on Earth as solar energy. The process we call photosynthesis used that energy to bind together molecules of (mostly) carbon and hydrogen, and in the process of doing that work the energy became tangled up in the molecules.
7. So all this vast quantity of solar energy accumulated inside Earth, below the steadily accreting surface, as life worked its magic. It couldn't do any work, it couldn't dissipate through matter, because it was bound up connecting atoms together into molecules.
8. Some knothead figured out that by applying a burst of energy to this stuff, he could set off a reaction in which oxygen broke apart the molecules, and the energy leaked out as heat.
Katie, bar the door.
So, we know one part of that story. The oxygen atoms hooked to the carbon,
9. And Presto Changeo! Hurricane Ida!
And steel. Fiberglass. Concrete. Speed. Speed. Speed.
SPEED! SPEED! SPEEDSPEEDSPEED!!!
The joy of speed.
10. But.
By itself burning oil doesn't make things move. It just stinks. People had to figure out some other stuff.
I often hear what came next described as "human nature," but...
We figured out how to make heat engines twice. First time we wrote it down and forgot about it.
50 CE (50 AD) Image
12. But that's neither here nor there.
The only way we know to get significant motion from the chemical energy in petroleum is by using one of a family of machines called heat engines.
No other way that we've ever figured out.
From the original steam engine, up through
13. the vast majority of our electricity "generation" (including nuclear), jet planes and automobiles, semi trailer trucks and lawnmowers, if it burns fuel to go it's got a heat engine.
And heat engines have an absolute maximum possible efficiency above which they cannot go.
14. The principles which cause heat engines to produce motion absolutely cannot, under any circumstances ever anywhere, convert all the heat to motion.
It just doesn't work. There has to be some left over. Some leaks out. The heat of your tailpipe is leftover heat, and it has 2B.
15. It is not the case that wicked capitalists are wasting all this fuel just to make the climate change and themselves rich.
It is pretty much a fact that America's cars and power plants are absolutely as fuel and energy efficient as anybody can figure out how to make them.
16. The reason so much of a new car is plastic is for fuel efficiency.
A modern, fuel injected, computer controlled, multi sensor equipped, small passenger car or small SUV, is about as fuel efficient as can be under the laws of physics. The biggest single variable is the driver.
17. Every time you use your brakes to slow, you are specifically rejecting unused energy into the atmosphere.
You pushed down your gas pedal, fuel burned, heat resulted, the largest possible portion of that heat (between ¼ and just over ⅓) was converted to kinetic energy, speed,
18. and when you push the brake pedal down, sintered metallic brake pads press on cast iron disks, creating friction, which converts your kinetic energy back into heat energy, which is then dissipated into the atmosphere, heating it, rejected energy.
The faster you were going
19. when the need to slow arose, the more kinetic energy your car and your body contained, all having already traveled from solar energy to chemical energy to heat energy to kinetic energy, had to be converted back into heat energy, from whence we lose its trail.
But it's there.
20. Let's return to our graphic.
How does this work?
Start with the pink boxes.
The pink boxes are all the things we do with energy. They are all the things we do with our lives. Image
21. The pink boxes are
🔸Residential
🔸Commercial
🔸Industrial
🔸Transportation
We spend all our lives at home, at places of business, at places of work, or traveling between them.
At all stages of our life we engage with energy, drawing it in, causing action, sending it on.
22. Used to be, all the energy humans interacted with came from food, or directly from sunlight. Sunlight makes wind and drives the sailing ships. Sunlight heats bodies and dwellings. Sunlight is captured in plants and animals.
We move our bodies on the energy from our food.
23. If we have animals to help us, carry our burdens, pull our transportation or our implements, they are burning food for energy.
Once we figured out we could burn petroleum for light we were out of the range of food energy. Coal heat took us past food energy.
24. But once we figured out how to harness concentrated energy, concentrated sunlight in the corpses of untold millions and billions of long-dead high level solar energy converters, we got crazy.
So: pink boxes. Image
25. It is common to speak of energy consumption, but energy is never consumed. It passes through. So the only accurate term is throughput. Lines come into the pink boxes from their left, and leave to their right. Energy flows the whole way. Image
26. This graphic explains the sources and destinations of 100.2 "Quads" of energy. To be honest, I don't know what a quad is - four something. Quadrillion killowatt-hours? I don't know. Don't even care. Bunches. Lots.
But - it's a handy number. Ignore the point-two, and think %
26. You've got 100(.2) going through. You can use every number as the percent of the total, and only be off by two-tenths of one out of the hundred. This is not close enough to hit Mars from here, but almost.
27. So for instance, you can see there that of our total energy supply in 2019, roughly ten percent was coal to generate electricity. Another 11% of our total energy appetite was natural gas to generate electricity, and another 8½% was nuclear energy to generate electricity. Image
28. Solar energy is about a half a percent of our total energy, and wind another 2¾%. About a third of our total energy goes to generate electricity - well, 37% - of which roughly ⅔ is fossil fuels.
And, of all the energy we put in to generate electricity, ⅔ goes out as hot air
29. It's a river, running from left to right. The pink boxes are us. We're standing in the Missouri River with our mouths open. A little bit flows in and through. Most of it goes right around us, misses us completely and heads on downstream.
And we can't fix that. It's reality. Image
30. Look at the right edges of the pink boxes.
We make pretty good use of the energy in our houses. More dark gray than light, more use than rejection.
Commerce is decent too.
Manufacturing is about half and half. Too many moving parts. Motion means heat engines means waste. Image
31. Transportation is a mess. It's all heat engines. They cannot be made efficient.
"Aha!" I hear you say. "Electric cars!"
Ah, but look at the orange box.
We make electricity with heat engines. Of the 37% of total energy we spend generating electricity, 30% of the total runs
32. Heat engines.
81% of our electricity is generated by heat engines. And we're not even charging electric cars with it.
It's an interesting picture, I think.
G'nite Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff McFadden

Jeff McFadden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @homemadeguitars

27 Sep
2. This is *the only way* to fight climate change. It requires slowing from "developed" speeds to food energy speeds as a component.
Not "renewable energy".
Less energy.
3. It is not only not necessary for societies to operate on high energy and speed, for the majority it is no improvement whatsoever, not if measured in mental and physical health and an overall sense of well-being. More stress, more danger, more anger, more required actions.
Read 18 tweets
27 Sep
I've been hesitant to tell this story. It sounds like boasting. This is not about me, and I don't want to be told how great I am. This is about other people.
2. On Friday night I drove up to Kansas City to jam with an old friend, as I often do.
I used to always give money to panhandlers on street corners, because I never had a job that miserable.
But the pimps ran all the homeless people off, and installed their older worn-out hookers
3. as panhandlers.
I feel sorry for the hookers, but I don't give money to pimps.
(Don't ask me how I know. I've lived my life on the edge of small-time crime and I know how it works and who's doing what.)
Read 8 tweets
24 Sep
I've got music tonight so this will be brief.
Three and a half to four years ago I believed the same thing everybody else does about climate change, wind turbines, solar panels, and the whole high energy high tech high speed solution to climate crisis. Not quite exactly, but...
I used to have articles online, but that website is broken and I don't care enough to fix it.
But I mostly believed it.
Then for no particular reason except it's how I think, I started trying to project manage the project.
I did a lot of big projects in my working life.
Take an empty two story concrete hospital in a country town, and turn it over to its owners with a complete functioning telephone and newtork on opening day.
Design the parts, bore the holes, run the cable...
Buy the cable, transport it, physically install it below floors,
Read 9 tweets
23 Sep
I wrote the thread below tonight. I have some comments on it.
First, the reason I explained in terms of government action is the same as the reason scientists use "perfect" media to explain processes and principles.
Perfect gas. Perfect black body radiation. So forth.
2. The real world is stark staring crazy, the home of chaos and variables. If you want to explain an idea you kinda leave some of that out. It's too confusing.
But it's real, and it's not smart to ignore it.
So, I developed societies were really to slow down, could they?
3. I don't know. I'm not at all optimistic they will, so if there is no free will, then no, they couldn't.
And that's way over my head.
In terms of hardware and grocery stores it theoretically could, by people doing it from the bottom. Refusing to maintain the average speed.
Read 15 tweets
22 Sep
I got this question tonight, from a gracious near-stranger who moved past me being a jerk. I want to publicly thank and answer her. My plan: slow down systematically.
First the mechanics:
Governments nationwide accept the fact that the only way, under the laws of physics, to reduce emissions today is to reduce energy throughput today.
Today, in the real world, we have exactly what we already have in energy sources.
3. I propose that the only realistic means to address climate change and the overarching ecosystem catastrophe is to reduce emissions and energy throughput today. If you'd like to hear a well reasoned lecture on my reasoning, from someone else who agrees independently,
Read 29 tweets
22 Sep
I'm reading this excellent article that my friend Midnight sent me, and right in the middle I stumble onto this concept
As regular readers know, I harp endlessly on the energy and resource cost of the "renewable energy" something for nothing solution to everything, and it falls on deaf ears.
And here's why:
Our definition of renewables is that they are free, they have no cost, they obtain energy which the ecosystem was otherwise wasting, which is by itself an insane belief.
But I'm saying, no, look, it takes all these material resources, steel, glass, and it takes energy to make
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(