I’m censored the most when I discuss the risk of DNA modification. <1month after I publicly made this prediction, MIT/Harvard came out with their 1st paper proving this possibility with viral RNA snippets. They were attacked. Why is this impossible? It’s clearly not.
1/This shows Spike protein and S1 in the plasma of vaccinated people for up to 28 days after injection. Levels peak at ~150 pg/mL, which is in the concentration range of Spike measured in COVID patients. Now, who said Spike remains at the injection site or in the cell membrane?
3/ The Pfizer Vaxx shows a similar profile, with circulating plasma Spike concentration returning to baseline in less than month after first and second dose. They claim 14 ug/mL peak, but describe how this high level doesn’t correlate with Ogata et al. mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/s…
1/ A modified model for Antibody Dependent Enhancement for SARS-COV-2. Read this paper.
“there is little risk to vaccinated individuals as long as a sufficient titer of anti-RBD antibodies is generated and maintained.” biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
2/ “once immunity starts to wane, a high ratio of non-neutralizing to neut. antibodies alongside M1 polarization, … and may suggest that neutralizing antibody titers in vacc. individuals should be monitored regularly to establish timelines for administration of booster doses.”
3/ .. “the impact of M1 observed here and in the literature suggests that recalibration of COVID-19 vaccines to produce a more balanced Th1/Th2 response may alleviate side effects,”
1/ I was censored for an article I wrote regarding how the vaccines are generating the variants. Now, in the FDA Advisory Committee meeting (pic below), they claim that vaccination correlates with an explosion of mutations. 3 of my previous tweets are attached with more info.