Thank you to my friend @RepAndyLevin for taking the lead on this. When we met with EU climate leaders this week, much of our conversation was about how we ensure that people who worked in the fossil fuel industry aren't stranded in the clean energy transition. A few thoughts:
1/ First, the clean energy transition is coming whether we like it or not. The job of policy is to make sure it comes as quickly as the climate crisis demands. But clean energy is cheap energy, and markets prefer cheap.
2/ Second the fossil sector - like all industries - has always invested in labor productivity that has enhanced their capital recovery even as it reduced their labor input. (See: longwall mining for example.)
3/ We have not, however, historically prioritized the interests of those displaced workers. The decline of job prospects in Appalachia started long before the decline in coal demand, after all.
4/ What we are asking in this transition is that we don't repeat that mistake. Massive wealth will be created as we transition to cheaper energy. Massive wealth will be transferred from energy producers to energy consumers.
5/ Our moral obligation is to do what prior investments in labor productivity didn't do, and make sure we equitably allocate the GAINS of this transition. Proud to stand with @RepAndyLevin and my colleagues in pushing to make sure we do so. / fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

24 Sep
Good data confirming what everyone who wasn't trying to politicize economic data already knew. Brief thread:
1/ First to state the obvious. If $300/week with no benefits that expires in September is a better deal that your current job... your employer is taking advantage of you.
2/ But beyond that there are two numbers to watch: unemployment rate and workforce participation. The 1st measures the # out of work divided by those looking for work. The 2nd is those in or looking for work divided by working age population.
Read 11 tweets
16 Sep
I have so much respect for the way our teachers have managed the last 18 months. And such frustration with those making teachers' and students' lives harder right now. Per @devalpatrick, we too often yell our hatred as we whisper our love. The case for yelling our love (thread):
1/ First, respect for our teachers who during the past year have had to figured out how to keep students engaged in person, fully remote, hybrid and all flavors in between with spotty wifi and health uncertainty. They are heroes.
2/ Second, respect for parents (especially moms!) who've had to adjust their own lives to accommodate kids at homes, no busses, no childcare and COVID ever-present in their family and communities.
Read 15 tweets
16 Sep
This is an equity issue. But it's also a financial stability issue. All of this capital moving around the country is going to be extremely disruptive, especially for regional banks. And it's accelerating.
This new @CeresNews report is worth the read. thehill.com/policy/equilib…
This is why @brianschatz and I have been pushing our financial regulators to treat climate change as a systemic risk and make sure we have monitors and buffers in place "avant le deluge". casten.house.gov/media/press-re…
Read 4 tweets
4 Sep
This is a good read to understand what to make of the conversations about whether it is fiscally prudent to spend $3.5T on additional infrastructure spending, but leaves out one important point (brief thread): cbpp.org/research/feder…
1/ First, the $3.5T we are talking about is gross spending. It is not a net amount. Focusing on that number alone is one hand clapping, akin to judging whether someone is paying too much for rent and groceries without knowing their income.
2/ Second, this is a 10 year figure. The current federal budget is about $5T/year, or $50T/10 years. $3.5T (net of offsets, per prior) is not especially large relative to current annual federal spending, or to our ~$21.4T/yr ($214T/10 yr) total GDP
Read 6 tweets
3 Sep
This logic from Sinema is fatally flawed, insofar as it implicitly assumes that our founders were wrong about the idea that hard questions are best decided by the will of the majority. Brief thread: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
1/ Today, with the filibuster in place the Senate is prohibited from DEBATING bills that are opposed by the minority. Not voting. Debating. It serves no purpose but to sustain ignorance.
2/ But since the Senate can't vote on a bill until they've debated it, it also blocks the vote. Ergo, our founders idea that hard questions should be resolved by the will of the majority has been inverted. Hard questions are now resolved by the will of the minority.
Read 12 tweets
2 Sep
Read Sotomayor's dissent. She understands the stakes, both for women and for the very legitimacy of the Supreme Court. I wish I could say the same of the majority of the justices. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
"the Texas Legislature has deputized the State’s citizens as bounty hunters, offering them cash prizes for civilly prosecuting their neighbors’ medical procedures"
"By prohibiting state officers from enforcing the Act directly and relying instead on citizen bounty hunters, the Legislature sought to make it more complicated for federal courts to enjoin the Act on a statewide basis."
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(