Time for a thread on some thoughts regarding the Best Friends of Fascism
Larpers and Edgelords
As time goes by, one of the main issues among the lines of "Modern Fascism", has been the one of people that instead of understanding that the rehabilitation of Fascism will come from showing yourself as an example of...
success and actual improvement of you as a person, that is, somebody that disproves the main narrative that Fascism is brainless violence, mere racism, and needless edgy takes. But overall, time has shown that these people are the faces of Fascism for the media...
after all, they are basically doing the media's job of portraying Fascism as what their preconceived notions are. Just brainless traditionalists looking for violence and genocide. This can all be traced down to a subversion from edgelords and larpers.
They have adopted the banner of Fascism, claim to understand its nature, goals and development, as they completely show the fact that not only do they not care for the doctrine they supposedly like, but they have an agenda of their own behind them.
We can see this with WigNats, TradCaths, Radical Traditionalists, or simple Right Wingers that believe that Fascism could achieve their libertarian goals after years of dictatorship. These people vary a lot, but they all stem from ignorance, purposeful carelessness...
or mere subversion from very interesting groups that glow in the dark.
The task of every reasonable Fascist should be to outline the difference between our groups, and call out the people that are pretending to be something they aren't.
Their main idea is that they get to interpret it the way they deem as correct since it fits their reactionary agenda, and they get to own le brown people, gays, jews, etc. The most hilarious part is that they think that old proto-Fascists/Fascists would support them back.
We can see people pretending that Race is the main core of Fascism, whereas if we look back, it was the main philosophers and figures that developed Fascism, whom opposed the Racial Laws of 1938. Fascism can involve Race, but not always, thus their claims are bogus.
Then we get to the laughable claim that Fascism has to be forcefully traditionalist or some shit, which can be disregarded by the mere presence of Futurism within the lines of the movement, or the variation that each branch had regarding Traditions. It all depends on the place.
The full meme of Fascist Violence can also be laughed at, as well with the believe that we are mere Action, whereas every single person within Fascism pushed for "Thought and Action". Being wimpy is useless in the same way being a strong brute is. But a Buff Nerd can do wonders.
Another thing can be their laughable attempt at appropiating Fascism for the right and making it seem Pro-Capitalism, when none of the Fascist Movements we've seen throughout the planet ever cathegorized themselves as such, and they all came from an Anti-Capitalist Standpoint.
Again, possibilities within Fascism vary, and a lot, but a reality of current "Fascism" is that many adopt it for the excuse of being needlessly edgy and reactionary. Even going so far as to believe that just because they are authoritarian they get to call themselves Fascists.
These people do not stand for Fascism nor do they care, they have double intentions that they display by the fact that if we were to be in other situation, they'd support the status quo insofar as it falls under their agenda. Fascism is the means to an end in their mind.
I'll attach some simple resources that also ellaborate into what I explained in this thread:
Another suggestion would be to merely check A. James Gregor or Zeev Sternhell, it wouldn't even hurt to check out what the movement you claim to represent actually wanted or did. Reality of the matter is that subversive people like that must be isolated or kicked out.
The End.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What is to be said about Bombacci that hasn't been explained before?
Initially a Communist, Nicola Bombacci would be one of the founders of the Italian Communist Party. He would also be a friend of Vladimir Lenin, a close one in fact, to the point Nicola would name his son...
after the Soviet Statesman. Nicola would be picked on by Blackshirts and many of the chants that the Fascist movement would march under the streets with, would involve mocking him, and talking about brushing Mussolini's bald head with Bombacci's beard.
It's often common to believe that one of the main beliefs of Fascism is that of Violence. That is, the Philosophy endorses the usage of violence as a core tenent of the Doctrine. This talking point is very popular among conservative boomers and left wingers.
In order to avoid stretching myself on stuff I've explained before, I'll attach this old thread regarding the "Anti-Intellectualism" and Cult to Action of Fascism:
No introduction, no anything, let's get to the point before I give up on life.
We must make two distinctions when dealing with the term "NazBol" as a whole, many people just interpret it as what "Third Position" is, that is, just mixing random...
left and right policies and going around stanning Stalin and the Austrian Painter, or by default, they slander Left leaning Fascists as NazBols. These attitudes obliterate the meaning of the word and the implications of its beliefs by making it a caricature, thus...
This was meant to be a short rant, but it ended being a thread.
Neither José Antonio nor Francisco Franco; Ramiro Ledesma!
Everyone knows why Francisco Franco was not a Fascist (except spergs and leftists), but there is something not many know in regards to Spanish Fascism, and that is; José Antonio Primo de Rivera was not the face of Spanish Fascism
Throughout the evolution of his writings and his side comments to his close ones, we can definitely understand that this person was nothing else but a larper that was trying to benefit from the Italian movement and its relevance.
As bizarre as this may be, Fascism once had its own "Internationale". You heard right, the Ultranationalistic hateful ideology once had/organized International meetings for Fascists belonging to different Nations.
First of all, we must distinguish between two concepts, that is, the Universal Character of Fascism, and what Universal Fascism represented.
The first one is the one that is used by your day to day Fascist, that is, we hold a Philosophy that is organically...