One of the points of contention about Covid transmission (for reasons I find hard to understand) has been whether children infect other members of the household, e.g., their parents. The question's a bit more interesting now that most parents are vaccinated. (1/4)
Although one can't provide definitive evidence by looking at Covid rates, it is at least possible to test a simple prediction that follows from a model in which children get infected at school and then infect their parents. (2/4)
In particular (all things equal):

a) increases in rates among children should precede those among adults, and
b) increases in rates among adults of parental age should precede those of other adults.

(3/4)
So far the data seem pretty consistent with this model. But causal inference isn't easy, and there may be other models that could explain these data (scratches head). What other theories are there? (the more absurd the better).

(4/4)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Colin Davis

Colin Davis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfColinDavis

27 Aug
Here we go again [LONG THREAD].

First we had “behavioural fatigue”. Now JCVI is invoking the notion of “vaccination fatigue” to explain falls in childhood immunisation.

theguardian.com/society/2021/a…
You might recall that “behavioural fatigue” was a previously unheard of phenomenon invoked by government advisers (chiefly Chris Whitty, it seems) to justify their (mistaken) belief that the public would not comply with lockdowns that lasted more than a couple of weeks.
In response, a large group of behavioural scientists signed an open letter asking for the evidence for this alleged phenomenon that they’d never heard of. (They never received an answer).

behavioralscientist.org/why-a-group-of…
Read 23 tweets
2 Aug
The minister for education is very keen for children to learn Latin. So here’s a thread with some Latin that I’d like @GavinWilliamson to learn. (All Latin etymology via etymonline.com).

An easy one for starters:

1)Virus. Latin for “poison”.
2)Transmission. From Latin transmittere "send across, cause to go across, transfer, pass on," from trans "across, beyond" + mittere "to release, let go; send, throw"
3)Mitigation. From the Latin mitigatus, past participle of mitigare "soften, make tender, ripen, mellow, tame," figuratively, "make mild or gentle, pacify, soothe".
Read 11 tweets
31 Jul
Order has been restored, and the link between cases and hospital admissions seems to be re-established. But this still leaves the puzzle of what happened in the middle of July, when cases and admissions briefly became unstuck. Image
On this graph, the black line shows the number of cases we'd expect, based on the number of (subsequent) admissions. The actual number fits the prediction (postdiction, technically) very nicely, except in the circled area. Image
The puzzle isn't what caused the spike. Pretty much everyone seems happy to lay the blame on football (people watching in groups indoors).

The puzzle is twofold:

1) Why didn't the case spike produce an admissions spike?
2) How did the spike dissipate so quickly without a trace?
Read 7 tweets
23 Jul
My TL is absolutely full of people who look at this graph and *still* want to say “the link is broken” or “the link has weakened” or “the jury is out”. So let me have another go at explaining a distinction that confuses some people (and is wilfully abused by others). [THREAD]
Of course vaccines have reduced the proportion of cases that lead to hospitalisation. I'm not denying that. I've published research about how important it is that we talk about the high efficacy of COVID vaccines, because this could increase vaccine uptake.bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
That research is published in the British Journal of Health Psychology (it's open access, so you can read it). bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…

There's a short summary in the @ConversationUK . theconversation.com/vaccines-for-c…

So yes -- VACCINES WORK!
Read 22 tweets
22 Jul
This one's for Dawn ...

Anyone who wants to claim that the link between cases and hospitalisation has been "broken" or "severed" might like to explain why the red line (cases) and the blue line (admissions) have been moving in near-perfect synchrony since the start of June.
One of the things I was at pains to point out in this interview is that we haven't broken the link (0:25).
Some people were confused that the plot above had separate scales on the left and right. This version might help. Note that hospitalisations are actually coming 7 days later than the case specimen date; the plot takes the lag into account so you can see the lines moving together.
Read 6 tweets
21 Jul
Someone posted this image (with no text) in response to some info about vaccination clinics. The highlighting draws attention to there having been more deaths among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. So let's briefly review why these numbers mean *you SHOULD get vaccinated*.🧵 Image
The bottom row of the table shows that among the over-50s, there were 50 deaths among people who'd been double-vaccinated versus only 38 among those who hadn't been vaccinated. So it's better not to get vaccinated, right? Wrong! Image
This is an example of what psychologists call the base-rate fallacy. If you made this mistake, don't feel bad, because pretty much everyone does, including experienced health-care professionals who confront this problem daily. Here's some more info. thedecisionlab.com/biases/base-ra…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(