I want to cry every time I check the online communities I joined this time last year.

Most of them are now barren wastelands.

Some thoughts on why online communities fail... 🧶
First, picture the scene:

You joined a poppin' Slack or Discord a while back.

It was LIT when you joined, but now it's... not lit.
Worse, it's a total ghost town...

A person without a profile photo floats around talking to themselves.

The latest post in the #wins channel is 7 months old – and it has two pitiful thumbs-up reactions.

The leader of the community is nowhere to be found.
Even Slackbot doesn’t want to be there, glowing a reluctant green in a sea of grey offline statuses.

"Save me," he seems to whisper...
The community has succumbed to Digital Darwinism.
Most of these communities started off with tons of potential, though...

They had a well-intentioned, enthusiastic leader.

The waitlist was overflowing with early believers.

But amidst the hype, the leader and members never really figured out *the most important thing.*
Why should people keep coming back to this community?

In other words:

WHAT IS OUR PURPOSE?
A purpose is the primary value that members get by participating in the community.

It's specific, not fuzzy.

AA’s purpose = get you sober.

CrossFit’s purpose = make you fit.

TED’s purpose = amplify important ideas.
But most communities never define their purpose... they only pick a category.

"We're a community of designers"

Designers are a category.

A purpose is the super-specific reason a community gathers.
Designers could:

• Mentor each other
• Help each other find work
• Invent new typography together
• Give feedback on each other’s work
• Lobby Congress to replace the English alphabet with Wingdings
If you try to do many things, you never get great at one important thing.

Members starting asking why they're there.

Momentum fizzles.

The community dies off and is absorbed back into the broader Internet.
But imagine that same community with a clear purpose.

A member makes a request: "let's launch a book club!!"

If the community exists to help designers get higher-paid work, you'll know to pick books about design careers.

Your core utility isn't diluted, it's amplified.
Side note: check out @priyaparker's book The Art of Gathering if you're into this stuff. It's brilliant.

“Here is the great paradox of gathering: There are so many good reasons for coming together that often we don’t know precisely why we are doing so.”
-@priyaparker

Onwards..
The purpose becomes the organizing principle for how the community is run.

It sets clear expectations for how members interact, which makes those interactions self-sustaining.

It fends off random, disorganized, scattered interactions that dilute value.
It also makes it way easier to onboard new members.

Instead of being dropped into a bunch of random conversations, new members quickly know how to add value & connect with other people.
So yeah, I think tons of the now-dead communities I joined last year never really squared on their purpose.

And so they died.

Which makes me sad.

/ Fin.
P.s. thank you to my fellow @FosterCoWriting-ites @dan2hunt and @alicellemee for their insight and help writing early drafts of this.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stew Fortier

Stew Fortier Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stewfortier

12 Sep
It may seem like robots are going to steal all the jobs, but Internet-native ways to earn a living are going to steal all the workers first
example: an aspiring screenwriter realizing they can make way more money doing freelance writing work online than bartending
And of course there are all sorts of way wilder things starting to happen...

This @nick_dewilde piece explains one: junglegym.substack.com/p/playing-earn…
Read 4 tweets
2 Sep
I will match donations to any organizations fighting for women to have full reproductive rights.

Reply here with your receipt and I’ll reply with mine.

Cap: $1k

(See next tweet for a few options)
Kicking things off with $50 to each of these orgs
Read 4 tweets
23 Aug
Ape NFTs:
• Over-hyped
• Dopey-looking
• Largely a signal that you're rich

Penguin NFTs:
• Cute
• Hilarious
• Only cost $30, forever shrouding your net worth in mystery
This is your sign to waste $30 on a jpeg of a penguin smoking a cigarette: opensea.io/collection/32p…
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
I interview successful online writers.

Some are doing $1M+ in revenue – others have built six-figure audiences.

No two succeeded in the same way.

Here's one quote + one lesson from each (thread):
“I spend very little time on distribution, partly because I find that the better the writing, the more it spreads.”
–Lenny Rachitsky (@lennysan)

Lesson: good writing is the foundation for growth.
“People choose products based on the single thing that they care about the most.”
–Steph Smith (@stephsmithio)

Lesson: don’t be average at a few things, be exceptional at one.
Read 11 tweets
2 Jun
If there's anything I've learned launching startups the past 10 years, it's this:

How we talk about startups barely resembles what they're actually like.

Here are some things most people don't understand about startups (thread):
Startup failure rates are way lower than most people think.

They're still brutal, but they're not 90%+.

Lots of people make life-changing money by starting startups.

Also, new money is pouring in and de-risking the entire ecosystem.
95% of a startup's "competitive advantage" early on is just giving a shit.

Investors and founders waste way too much time talking about strategy.

What matters is if founders care 10x more about a problem than a salaried employee elsewhere.

If so, they’ll figure out how to win.
Read 16 tweets
25 May
I've now asked 30+ successful newsletter writers how they got their first 1,000 subscribers.

Their answers are amazingly similar.

Here's how to go from 0 to 1K subscribers (thread):
First, the high-level lessons:

1. Most growth tactics are simple, not easy.

2. You have to write good stuff for people to subscribe & stick around.

3. It's easier to succeed with a clear niche, but you can succeed without one.

4. Different wins – make your writing distinct.
Now, the tactics.

Here's what most people did to go from zero subscribers to 1,000+...
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(