I teach a grad course on clinical trial methodology for behavioral interventions.
If this is a topic you’d like to learn more about, here are the main take homes from my class (with recommended readings!) in a thread! 🧵
Here goes! 1/x
First, you must understand the phases of behavioral intervention development and testing. I can’t tell you how much I see these phases confused in grant applications and papers.
Next, intervention development starts with a conceptual model that delineates the key drivers of the behavior you are targeting. To understand those drivers, your assignment is to delve into the basic behavioral science and observational study literature on the topic. 3/x
Ready for a pilot feasibility trial? Yay! The biggest mistake investigators make in designing pilot trials is picking the wrong outcomes.
Hot tip: don't test feasibility & efficacy in the same trial. Cramming them together is like an airplane pilot running tests to see if the plane is OK to fly while the plane is in the air. Better to test that before taking flight not after!
Live scene from my pilot trial:
5/x
Warning: Many pilot trials in the literature are riddled with bias. Here is a great piece on 9 sources of bias in pilot trials (feat @briemcgrievy).
Now for control groups! This is the biggest decision you will make. Different control groups answer different questions, so make sure your control group answers the right question.
Hot tip: In pilot trials, testing the feasibility of your control group is often just as important as testing the feasibility of the intervention.
How will people respond to it? Will they drop-out? Will it have an intervention effect? How much?
8/x
What about attention control groups? (They are way over-utilized) We should only use these if there's reason to believe "attention" could affect the primary outcome.
Hot tip: Attention control groups may seem benign but they can cause harm! We once saw worse outcomes in an attention control relative to usual care. 😲
Now for efficacy vs effectiveness. They aren't synonyms. It's important to know the distinction. Efficacy trials ⬆️ internal validity and effectiveness trials ⬆️ external validity. Here are some resources on the difference: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
11/x
Now for treatment fidelity--the degree to which the intervention was delivered as intended. For ex, did your health coaches cover all of the protocol objectives or end up doing their own thing?
Finally, be sure to design your behavioral intervention with implementation and dissemination in mind. Where will the intervention “live”? How will you get it into real world settings?
First, let’s review why the loss of #reprorights puts women's health at risk. Here are the stats on maternal mortality in the US compared to other industrialized nations.
This is inexcusable.
2/x
Digging deeper into the data reveals enormous inequities. Black women have 3 times the maternal mortality rate as white women. As do Native American women, women with diabetes, CVD, and obesity.
The usefulness of GRE and GPA for grad school entry is heavily debated for good reason. Poor predictors of success!
I find that the most important characteristic of a candidate is actually none of these. It is COACHABILITY.
Here is why and what coachability is and isn’t. 1/x
Why coachability? People who are coachable easily overcome lack of experience simply because they are so highly motivated to learn.
Hands down, I would rather someone who is highly coachable with meh GRE scores than someone who is meh coachable and stellar GRE. 2/x
One characteristic of a coachable person is they are 100% aware that they don’t know what they don’t know. In other words, they are aware they have blind spots and are highly motivated to fill in those blind spots. 3/x
To learn how we can make Fall semester better, we asked students (n=60) what professors did when spring courses went online that showed they CARE about their students.
A very popular response was professor accessibility via frequent office hours and email made students feel cared for. Quick responses and lots of opportunities to connect were very appreciated. 2/x
Next, students appreciated professor flexibility and relaxing of certain course policies (e.g., grading, deadlines, test taking procedures). Being at home made their schedules more chaotic and brought up new challenges. Flexibility helped make it work and eased the stress. 3/x
College students return to campus in a few weeks. We wanted to know their thoughts about quarantine, symptom tracking, contact tracing, and mask wearing on campus, so my grad student @laurie_groshon and I did focus groups to find out.
Here’s what students told us
1/x
First, we asked them about the required 14 day quarantine before the semester starts. Every student we asked said that this is not realistic and will likely fail. 😳
2/x
They pointed out that students are eager to see each other and will find a way to do so when they arrive on campus. They said that students who live 1-2 hours away will try to find a way to go home. They said off campus students will likely find their way on campus. 😬
3/x
I’m seeing a lot of talk about the role of “personal responsibility” in behavior (& behavioral interventions).
The idea is that if people just took more “responsibility” they would be doing the things we think they should be doing.
This thinking is a dead end.
A thread
1/x
If a person exercises regularly or wears a mask, one might conclude this person has taken “personal responsibility.” But personal responsibility doesn’t actually explain ❓why❓ a behavior has occurred.
It is simply a subjective judgment about one’s character.
2/x
To gain an understanding of why a behavior is occurring we instead need to examine the contextual factors that cue and reinforce the behavior for that individual, both at present and in their past.
3/x
A THREAD (AND AN OFFER!) for front line doc and nurse researchers! 😷🩺🩹
FRONT LINERS: Was your plan to submit an NIH grant interrupted by #covid19?
We want to help YOU for helping us. 🙏1/x
We appreciate your 100% clinic commitment 💜and want to help the research stay alive! 💪
THE DEAL: A team of NIH-funded researchers has offered to provide volunteer peer reviews of your R or K proposal drafts you intended (or still intend) to submit on the next NIH deadline. 2/x
How will this work?
I will match you and your proposal to a volunteer reviewer who will give you comments and feedback just like an NIH reviewer would. 3/x