As 27/9 we have performed 2.784.002.912 Covid test.
~2.555.000.000 of them completely USELESS NEGATIVE and redundant.
At a CHEAP 50€ (test, personnel & general costs) that's €~130 BILLION went down the drain
As tests has avoided NO outbreak,
Ask yourself where the drain ends
Data from @OurWorldInData , one of the most Covidian biased platforms
Curiously, among TONS of charts&data, ALWAYS accompanied with the worst scaring explain; you CAN'T find this huge, absolutely disproportioned figure
But you can calculate adding national numbers they provide
We constantly hear final numbers of deaths, cases, ICU, Loooong Covid, and who knows what, but global cumulative test, never
As hidden as in @OurWorldInData
Because number is SO monstrous that exposes Covid vicious disproportion at once
What could 130 BILLION do for starving?!
What will 130B help in malaria or AIDS treatments, sheer water sanitation, children vaccination from REAL dangerous deseases, opening schools, micro credits for women to begin business
We chose to throw them down the drain, in USELESS test, cos we're scared
Disgustingly selfish
In the minutes period you've taken to read the thread some tenths of THOUSANDS test have being performed, and time of all people involved, your money and everybody's sanity keep going down the drain.
All this effort must go NOW to solve the mess created by panic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Spain's 7 days Infection Rate IR is 27 as today
NewNormal limit is <10
That arbitrary limit has NEVER BEEN EXPLAINED, it was just IMPOSED
Scientifical epidemic limit we used every year was 58.52
SIX TIMES HIGHER
For science we're in Basal Phase
Our official scientific method offered detailed yearly limits for every region (in red in previous graph) coming from historical epidemia data, including hosp pressure.
Checking every region IR as a % of epidemic limit, we found the country (except one from and 2 autonomous cities, see next tweet) is clearly deep into the green NON EPIDEMIC ZONE
National average as low as ~40%
Si colocamos la IA de hoy como porcentaje del límite científico para epidemia vemos que todas las Comunidades están MUY claramente en la zona VERDE, con la media nacional apenas por encima del 40%
Ningún año, usando la ciencia, hubiéramos llamado a esto epidemia.
Este, PANDEMIA.
We've discovered it by chance, at @OurWorldInData , and shockingly we first notice that test policy is determined by a weird, illogical, approach to positivity.
You have to have LOW positivity, or you're not testing enough, let's analyse this tool crooked implications.
They demand a positivity under ~9%, completely jumping over the lesser statistical logic, and ignoring any coherence in universe studied.
The idea that you must go out, at random general population screening, to find NEGATIVE CASES to get positivity down, is simply astonishing.
Ante la demostración de que la abrumadora mayoría de los test NO están relacionados con el seguimiento de la Pandemia (trazado de contactos y sintomáticos sospechosos) el trøll afirma pomposo que no se están haciendo test porque sí:
Tiene razón
Se hacen porque lo manda la OMS
Gracias a una escondida nota de la muy Covidiana @OurWorldInData hemos encontrado la 'política aconsejada, (a los efectos: la ley de Dios: lo que diga la OMS), hasta ahora opacas. Los máximos dirigentes de la OMS lo contaron en un debate en marzo.
Para mi asombro el énfasis de presión de test se basa en buscar POSITIVIDADES bajas, no como objetivo epidémico (poca transmisión) sino como un indicador de la política de test!
Lo de hacer test a un universo comparable, el criterio estadístico y la mínima lógica son ignoradas.
2.555.000.000 completamente INÚTILES NEGATIVOS y redundantes
A precio de amigo (test, personal, G generales!) 50€, son ~130.000 M€ tirados si retrete
Los test no han evitado ninguna ola,
Así que piensa dónde va la tubería del retrete
Nos cuentan constantemente las cifras globales de casos, de muertes, de todo; pero la de test, nunca.
También @OurWorldInData la esconde, pero sus datos no.
Porque esta cifra por si sola expone la brutal desproporción
Imaginad lo que harían 130.000 millones € contra el hambre!
Y contra la malaria o el SIDA, en agua potable y saneamiento, en vacunaciones imprescindibles para niños, en educación, microcréditos para mujeres?
Pero elegimos tirar ese dinero por el retrete porque estábamos aterrados por La Covín