Music affects us on multiple levels of the brain. From the most fundamental, to the incredibly complex. And a lot of it is tied up with instinct, emotion, memory, and so on.
E.g. some argue that certain sounds trigger instinctive emotional reactions.
Discordant, high-pitched, chaotic noise sounds like the shriek of a predator, so we don't like them
Rhythmic noise means harmony and coordination, so we like that, and so on.
/3
At the higher levels of neurological functioning, there's the recognition of pattern, an appreciation of complexity combined with order, and so on.
Suffice to say, music ticks a lot of the brain's boxes. Hence it's so popular.
/4
There's also the fact that music triggers a lot of emotional responses, and memory and emotion are heavily intertwined. Ergo, the music that triggers the strongest emotional reactions will typically be the stuff you enjoy the most
/5
However, because of how neurological development works, our emotions are most potent and sensitive during our teenage years. Which is why, no matter how old they are, people often feel the music of their teens was 'the best', and keep listening to it
Overall, music affects our brains in multiple ways, and the stuff that we do like affects us on various levels, so we can keep listening to examples of it long term. It's often like a cherished memory; it's impact may fade, but we don't really tire of reliving it
/7
Humour and jokes don't really have that luxury though.
The actual neurological mechanisms of humour aren't thoroughly understood (because that would rely on scientists being able to make anyone and everyone laugh on cue), but some things we think we DO know...
/8
And one thing the neurological regions heavily implicated in humour processing seem to be particularly attuned to is *incongruity*. If there's no incongruity, there's not really much chance of humour being recognised/triggered/whatever.
I'm aware I need to translate this
/9
Basically, our brains seemingly run a constantly-updated model, or simulation, of how the world works, informed by all our memories, beliefs, experiences, predictions, understandings etc. We use this to navigate and interact with the wider world. Makes sense, right?
/10
However, we often encounter things which challenge or even violate our existing understanding of how things we work. We expect one thing to happen, but another thing does. Now we're into the arena of uncertainty, and our brains don't like that
Usually things which violate our understanding and expectations, which are *incongruous*, trigger negative emotions. But, what if the incongruity is resolved, quickly, efficiently, and safely, even in a way which enhances and updates our understanding?
That's GOOD, right?
/12
And that, the incongruity, the violation of expected norms *and its safe and rapid resolution* is, according to some research at least, the most fundamental component of humour, and our response to it (positive emotions, laughter etc.)
/13
At the most basic levels, this can be seen in wordplay, i.e. the humble pun. ONE word, with TWO meanings? That's not how words work!
But our brains spot that both meanings are valid and there is no challenge to our understanding of language, so it's fine. Ha ha. Very good.
/14
Incongruity can be physical, like slapstick. Someone doing a hugely elaborate fall isn't *meant* to happen, and if they hurt themselves it's not funny. But if they're uninjured, the incongruity is resolved safely, and it can be hilarious, so you laugh.
/15
Incongruity can also be cultural. The pantomime Dame is the personification of 'a MAN, in a DRESS? That's not how things work!'
'...ah, but it's a performance. A safe context where the rules are different, so it's allowed'. Incongruity resolved, and we can laugh (or not).
/16
Basically, for our brains, jokes and humour seemingly depend on expectations being violated and resolved, very quickly, in safe and informative ways. Our brains find this rewarding, so humour is pleasurable. We've even evolved to utilise it, for mating, communication etc.
/17
It also explains why sense of humour can vary so wildly between individuals. How quickly your brain resolves contradictions, combined with everyone having their own unique set of understandings and expectations, greatly influences what we laugh at.
/18
However, this does mean that jokes/expressions of humour fundamentally rely on expectations being violated. And if you've encountered the joke before, your brain knows what's coming, so expectations *won't* be violated. So, a humour response is far less likely to occur
/19
It's not that you can't laugh a joke again. It can happen. It may be memory of the strong emotional response from first hearing, the appreciation of the complexity of it, the recognition and familiarity of the subject matter, etc.
/20
But even so, a joke is rarely ever *as* enjoyable as the first time you encounter it. For your brain, it's like re-reading a mystery novel; still enjoyable, but as long as you can remember it, the resolution is never as impactful if you already know it's coming.
/21
So, music is more about the journey, humour is more about the destination, at least as far as our brains are concerned
And that's maybe why comedians have to keep coming up with new stuff, while musicians are regularly urged to play 'the classics'.
/22
I have a whole chapter about this in my second book The Happy Brain
Addendum: this thread more applies to specific jokes. Many people have cited routines/sketches/performances that make them laugh repeatedly, but that involves a lot more complexity as a stimulus, so is arguably more akin to music
@GuitarmoogMusic A big part of why we often struggle to remember someone's name relates to a previous #BrainStuff thread; the v small capacity of the short term memory
Basically, our brains can only take in a small amount of abstract info at once
/2
When you meet someone, they tell you their name. But very rarely is that the only information dispensed by the encounter. A conversation normally ensues, where a lot of basic personal info is exchanged. Their name is a small part of this.
/3
A lot of stuff goes on in our brains when we sleep, like clearing away the cellular debris built up during the day. But one particularly important process is the consolidating, organising, and general sorting out of memories, old and new.
/2
When a new memory is formed in the brain, it's not just left there. It's linked up to existing memories, depending on relevance, category, stuff like that. And a lot of this happens when we're asleep, like a library that sorts all the new books after hours
/3
In honour of the news of #RTD returning as showrunner of #DoctorWho, here, for newer followers, is the tale of how I was (briefly) rumoured to be in line as the new Doctor
/1
It was the mid-2000s, and I was part of a BBC Wales TV fly-on-the-wall/reality TV game show about comedians in Cardiff. Don't bother looking for it, it's not worth your time
But because of this, we were put in touch with the local media
/2
I was doing my PhD at the time, so the "A scientist? Doing comedy? Whatever next!" angle was apparently an enticing one
It was also early January. That's why the local paper decided to get my thoughts on something called 'Blue Monday', aka the most depressing day of the year
/3
Short-term and long-term memory are actually very different things, in terms of how they work in the brain. It's like comparing printed books to blackboards, or some other analogy which doesn't make me sound like I'm from the 19th century
/2
The main difference between long-long term and short-term memory is that long-term memories have a physical presence in the brain. Short term... doesn't. Not strictly speaking. It's more patterns of neurological activity. While still complex, they're way more fleeting.
/3
Meant to tweet this yesterday, for what should have been Ray Gravell's 70th birthday. Got waylaid by my own daughter's 6th birthday party though, so am sharing it now
It's the tale of when my gran met Ray, and is probably the most quintessentially Welsh thing ever
/1
It was 2007, during the Rugby World Cup. This was after the Wales V Japan game in Cardiff. Dad, at the time, was in events management, and had a big fancy do happening at the Angel hotel, with a lot of former Wales players attending. Including Ray Gravell.
/2
It was my first time meeting Grav in person. For the record, a lovelier human you could scarcely hope to meet. The embodiment of everything positive about Wales and the Welsh. He was our perfect ambassador. So that was nice.
/3
This study, published today, helped crystalize something I've thought for ages
Which is, most anti-lockdown arguments are based on a false premise
/1
The majority of lockdown-sceptic arguments I've seen seem to assume that we have a simple choice; restricted life under lockdown, or normal life with the pandemic
This is actually balls; our options are, pandemic with lockdown, or pandemic without lockdown
That's it
/2
This is a key difference. It seems that lockdown sceptics assume that the lockdown rules are the only thing making people behave differently.
In some cases, this may be true. But for most people, the PANDEMIC ITSELF will be driving their (economically unproductive) behaviour
/3