It's unsurprising that @sapinker's book Enlightenment Now is loved by billionaires. It's a catalogue of system-justifying falsehoods. I analysed the environment chapter, and found it crammed with anecdote, cherry-picking and discredited claims: monbiot.com/2018/03/09/con…
People who have spent similar amounts of time parsing other chapters that cover their specialisms, have reached the same conclusions. It's a total crock.
However, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bill Clinton and others heavily invested in the status quo are mad about it.
He's been right about stuff in the past, but this book is a lazy recitation of rightwing talking points, relying on secondary or tertiary sources that suit his arguments, and making numerous claims that are demonstrably false.
He grandly claims his critics are "opposed to reason" or "opposed to the Enlightenment".
It's more mundane than that. We're opposed to bullshit.
More on this subject in Alex Blasdel's article today: theguardian.com/science/2021/s…
I guess there's a weary inevitability about the BBC giving Pinker a series. It has become ever more hostile to ideas that challenge established power, and ever more receptive to those that support it.
At a time of global crisis, the BBC is burrowing under the duvet. The more extreme our situation gets, the more conservative it becomes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I now believe that if I live into my 90s, I have a high chance of witnessing systemic environmental collapse.
By systemic environmental collapse, I mean something specific: an Earth system passing its critical threshold, then triggering the tipping of other systems.
I'm 58.
If this cascade begins, it could happen very quickly. There would be nothing we could do to stop it. The only means of preventing it is determined action now.
By determined action, I mean efforts one or two orders of magnitude greater than current efforts.
Preventing systemic environmental collapse requires systemic economic change. At the moment, the most any government offers is tinkering at the margins of the current economic system.
This isn’t a climate emergency, or a biodiversity emergency, or a pollution emergency, or a soil emergency.
It's a full-spectrum assault on every aspect of the living world.
And our only means of stopping it is to level down.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Systems thinking helps us to edge a little closer to what Kant called the ding an sich: the world as it is, rather than the world bounded by our perceptions. Of course, we will never progress beyond a certain point, because our senses shape this thinking too. But ...
Thread/
The highly simplified model of the world projected by politics and the media makes moral idiots of us all.
In science and mathematics, extraordinary advances have been made in the understanding of how complex systems work. But these are not reflected in public discussion.
I know the risks involved, but I swim in rivers most days, as I love it so much. Until now, I’ve been lucky. But after a dip in the Thames yesterday, I’ve spent a night and a day throwing up. Thanks for all the💩@thameswater.
I wish I could say, "so long and thanks for all the 💩"
But that would mean my water gets cut off. The promise of privatisation was that if we didn’t like the service, we could take our business elsewhere. But the only way of changing your water provider is to move house.
The water companies enjoy private monopolies, and exploit them ruthlessly, aided by the deregulation agenda of successive governments. Since 1989, they’ve extracted at least £56bn in dividends. All this is money that should have been used to upgrade the system.
We've wasted five years in this country, and will waste many more, on Brexit, whose sole purpose was to resolve an internal dispute in the Conservative Party.
Years we could have spent addressing our real, existential crisis, the threat to the living systems that keep us alive.
Sometimes I wonder whether such cosmic self-indulgence, this profligacy with time even as it was running out, was a way of avoiding the real issues government should have been addressing. A giant displacement activity.
People will look back on this age (if anyone still has the means or time to look back) with incredulity. "They were obsessing over THAT when they should have been dealing with THIS? You have to be kidding!"
Why is it easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism?
Because capitalism itself is difficult to imagine.
Most people struggle to define it.
Its champions disguise its true nature.
So let's imagine something easier: the end of concentrated wealth.
Thread/
After all, capitalism is the means, concentrated wealth is the end.
Capitalism is the tool used to concentrate wealth.
Inequality drives the collapse of Earth systems.
The impacts of the wealthy and the companies they control are massively greater than those of ordinary people.
Let’s focus on what is tangible: the extreme inequality pushing us towards destruction, while simultaneously causing grostesque social injustice.
Let’s demand wealth taxes high enough to break the spiral of accumulation and create a fairer and greener society.