This isn’t a climate emergency, or a biodiversity emergency, or a pollution emergency, or a soil emergency.
It's a full-spectrum assault on every aspect of the living world.
And our only means of stopping it is to level down.
My column.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Systems thinking helps us to edge a little closer to what Kant called the ding an sich: the world as it is, rather than the world bounded by our perceptions. Of course, we will never progress beyond a certain point, because our senses shape this thinking too. But ...
Thread/
The highly simplified model of the world projected by politics and the media makes moral idiots of us all.
In science and mathematics, extraordinary advances have been made in the understanding of how complex systems work. But these are not reflected in public discussion.
Complex systems are entirely different, in properties, functions and outcomes, to simple ones. The world's composed of interlocking complex systems. Yet we insist on discussing and analysing it as if it were a series of simple ones. It's like using kitchen scales to measure light
In other words, in public life we use the wrong measures in trying to understand the wonderful, fascinating, amazingly complex planet on which we live.
And its living systems.
And human society.
A complex system is as different from a simple one as a river is from a swimming pool
Because we profoundly misinterpret our situation, everything we do to improve it has perverse consequences.
Mistaking complex systems for simple ones opens the way for an extreme individualism, that now governs political and economic thinking.
People claim to be "self-made", to "go it alone", to "stand apart". But only because they have no understanding of the world that shaped them.
Look at the language we use. "Individuals" is now widely used as a replacement for "people". We now attach the redundant prefix "personal" to almost everything.
I mean, how can you have an impersonal friend?
And how can you speak impersonally? ("Personally speaking ...")
It's as if in everything we do and say, we have to separate ourselves from everything else, to cut the cords that connect us to the world.
But that's just my personal opinion.
Otherwise known as my opinion.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

30 Sep
I now believe that if I live into my 90s, I have a high chance of witnessing systemic environmental collapse.
By systemic environmental collapse, I mean something specific: an Earth system passing its critical threshold, then triggering the tipping of other systems.
I'm 58.
If this cascade begins, it could happen very quickly. There would be nothing we could do to stop it. The only means of preventing it is determined action now.
By determined action, I mean efforts one or two orders of magnitude greater than current efforts.
Preventing systemic environmental collapse requires systemic economic change. At the moment, the most any government offers is tinkering at the margins of the current economic system.
Read 7 tweets
28 Sep
It's unsurprising that @sapinker's book Enlightenment Now is loved by billionaires. It's a catalogue of system-justifying falsehoods. I analysed the environment chapter, and found it crammed with anecdote, cherry-picking and discredited claims: monbiot.com/2018/03/09/con…
People who have spent similar amounts of time parsing other chapters that cover their specialisms, have reached the same conclusions. It's a total crock.
However, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bill Clinton and others heavily invested in the status quo are mad about it.
He's been right about stuff in the past, but this book is a lazy recitation of rightwing talking points, relying on secondary or tertiary sources that suit his arguments, and making numerous claims that are demonstrably false.
Read 6 tweets
27 Sep
I know the risks involved, but I swim in rivers most days, as I love it so much. Until now, I’ve been lucky. But after a dip in the Thames yesterday, I’ve spent a night and a day throwing up. Thanks for all the💩@thameswater.
I wish I could say, "so long and thanks for all the 💩"
But that would mean my water gets cut off. The promise of privatisation was that if we didn’t like the service, we could take our business elsewhere. But the only way of changing your water provider is to move house.
The water companies enjoy private monopolies, and exploit them ruthlessly, aided by the deregulation agenda of successive governments. Since 1989, they’ve extracted at least £56bn in dividends. All this is money that should have been used to upgrade the system.
Read 5 tweets
26 Sep
We've wasted five years in this country, and will waste many more, on Brexit, whose sole purpose was to resolve an internal dispute in the Conservative Party.
Years we could have spent addressing our real, existential crisis, the threat to the living systems that keep us alive.
Sometimes I wonder whether such cosmic self-indulgence, this profligacy with time even as it was running out, was a way of avoiding the real issues government should have been addressing. A giant displacement activity.
People will look back on this age (if anyone still has the means or time to look back) with incredulity. "They were obsessing over THAT when they should have been dealing with THIS? You have to be kidding!"
Read 5 tweets
24 Sep
Why is it easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism?
Because capitalism itself is difficult to imagine.
Most people struggle to define it.
Its champions disguise its true nature.
So let's imagine something easier: the end of concentrated wealth.
Thread/
After all, capitalism is the means, concentrated wealth is the end.
Capitalism is the tool used to concentrate wealth.
Inequality drives the collapse of Earth systems.
The impacts of the wealthy and the companies they control are massively greater than those of ordinary people.
Let’s focus on what is tangible: the extreme inequality pushing us towards destruction, while simultaneously causing grostesque social injustice.
Let’s demand wealth taxes high enough to break the spiral of accumulation and create a fairer and greener society.
Read 5 tweets
22 Sep
It's a difficult issue to broach, but something is going very badly wrong in the counter-culture.
My column.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
True radicalism requires constant self-examination. Image
The question is not whether or not we are scared.
It's about what should scare us most. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(