Imagine if local governments began looking at the histogram of net worth of their population every day, calculated in an opt-in/privacy-protecting way.

Not just the median, the whole distribution.
Not just the income, the savings minus debt.

Then acted every day to boost that.
How to execute on this?

1) Fintech apps already have much of this data
2) States like Estonia & Singapore have national ID systems via e-identity & Singpass that can serve as primary key
3) Histograms can be calculated in privacy-preserving way, eg: link.springer.com/article/10.114…
Our current metrics for society are bad because they are easily gamed and aren't granular enough.

Society doesn't necessarily prosper as a whole if the stock market goes up. But it would if the (inflation-adjusted) net worth histogram was right-shifted.
What OpenGov is doing is also relevant here. Perhaps integrate citizen data, on an opt-in, aggregated, and anonymized basis, into the city dashboard via a city app.

cc @FrancisSuarez @ZacBookman
opengov.com
The OpenGov City Manager's Dashboard.

This could be extended to startup cities, and to online communities with large budgets like DAOs.
opengov.com/products/budge…
Just like a startup, you can pull many different kinds of analytics into a city dashboard. opengov.com/products/budge…
Btw, city managers are more like CEOs. Unlike mayors they are not elected. They run the city on a day-to-day basis. onlinempa.unc.edu/blog/city-mana…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Balaji Srinivasan

Balaji Srinivasan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @balajis

30 Sep
Product-as-journalism

- coinmarketcap.com
- windy.com
- nomadlist.com
- ourworldindata.org

Dashboards that present numbers alongside (monetizable?) actions can replace pure text coverage in many verticals.
The numbers are the raw data
Dashboards are presentations thereof
Subjective text accompanies dashboards
Monetizable actions alongside that text

Seems obvious, and already happening, yet also an important lens on what useful information looks like.
Newspapers usually leave their call to action implicit. But it's often "get angry at this guy", then "subscribe now".

The alternative concept of calls-to-action alongside dashboards is interesting. Every action recommended would be explicit, vetted, and possibly monetized.
Read 6 tweets
28 Sep
Concept: what if your community newspaper was re-centered around a community dashboard?

It addresses the ADD aspect of news judgment. Rather than random stories every day, your community would instead track metrics over time, like $ saved or time working out. And improve them.
Any company beyond a certain scale has a set of dashboards that the CEO and all execs review each day. Examples below.

What if you did that for a community, like a DAO?
geckoboard.com/dashboard-exam…
The point of tracking metrics over time, and centering the morning on them, is that it gives long-term memory and focus.

The day doesn't start with random stories from a newspaper. The day starts with visualizing shared long-term goals, and tracking actions against those goals.
Read 9 tweets
23 Sep
The School of Fish strategy

Just repeat what everyone else is saying. If it's proven wrong, well, everyone was wrong together. The establishment's consensus algorithm. Works until falsified by the outside world.
When is the School of Fish Strategy less effective?

In engineering, business, and war. The ability to manufacture consensus *within* your social network only partially overlaps with the skills necessary to build products, sell products, and win wars.
Consensus is still fairly important in those areas. You do need to manage teams.

But it's related to the distinction between political truths and technical truths. Is it true if others think it’s true? Or is it true regardless of what people think?
Read 4 tweets
22 Sep
The borders between nation states are visible, but the overlap between social networks is not.

We can see the physical border between France & Germany on a map. We can't visualize the border between Twitter & Facebook. Which people are on the border, with accounts on both sites?
It's not just digital borders that are invisible, it's digital citizenship.

States can list the dual citizens of the US and Germany, but no one has the list of all dual holders of BTC and ETH.

This is how the pseudonymous economy leads to an encrypted world.
Old maps had genuine terra incognita. Places outside the ken of the civilization mapping them, mysterious places supposedly marked by "here be dragons". The phrase is apocryphal [1], but the concept is not.

[1] theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
Read 8 tweets
21 Sep
We might systematize this to measure the relative effects of luck-vs-skill.

Pick N random people each year and give them X. Compare their outcomes to N people selected by a purported meritocratic mechanism, and also given X. And see how the latter do versus the former.
Observations:

1) This can also be used to benchmark competing meritocratic mechanisms vs each other. Essay only, or essay + SAT for admissions?

2) You could do this in crypto right now given DAO budgets.

3) Crypto could make outcome measurement easier due to on-chain metrics.
The reason to keep running the experiment every year, even at some expense, is that it's a good health check on the claimed meritocracy of society.

For example, does a Harvard degree have as much of a signal today as it did in 1990?

Or is there talent which it's not picking up?
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
Sometimes people genuinely oppose a policy, but often they just distrust the people implementing it.
This gives at least four choices:

1) Abandonment: stop pursuing the policy
2) Coercion: force distrusters to obey, boosting their distrust
3) Subsidiarity: find someone the distrusters trust to implement the policy
4) Cryptoification: reduce the need for trust in the first place
Discourse today mostly focuses on (1) and (2). Should the policy be junked, or should it be forced through?

However, in theory you could use some combination of (3) web-of-trust and (4) trust-minimizing computation to attain consensus around at least a subset of policy problems.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(