The numbers are the raw data
Dashboards are presentations thereof
Subjective text accompanies dashboards
Monetizable actions alongside that text
Seems obvious, and already happening, yet also an important lens on what useful information looks like.
Newspapers usually leave their call to action implicit. But it's often "get angry at this guy", then "subscribe now".
The alternative concept of calls-to-action alongside dashboards is interesting. Every action recommended would be explicit, vetted, and possibly monetized.
This is similar to the paper/scanner/digital document concept. As you go from cash, to fintech, to cryptocurrency, you go from the offline version, to a scanned online, to the natively digital version.
What's possible when it's not just a scanned broadsheet?
The ability to have buttons next to multimedia is only a few decades old. And we still separate things out into "apps" and "content".
But it feels that far more can be done with actions embedded in the content, like quantum.country.
One other thing: if you have call-to-action buttons alongside dashboards and textual content, money is now on the line. So there may be a sort of a built-in fact checking that occurs.
"Is this really true, is this worth my money?"
There's an incentive to be cautious.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Swallowing the fait-accompli may become the leitmotif of U.S. decline even though acceptable political rhetoric will never allow it to be confessed openly." issforum.org/roundtables/po…
Maier: "In the long run the US is unlikely to overcome the assertiveness of China...Rather than insisting on global leadership, the task of the US should be to manage America’s relative decline in a multipolar system without military conflict." issforum.org/roundtables/po…
When you hear the alternative view, you realize why you don't hear the alternative view.
Imagine if local governments began looking at the histogram of net worth of their population every day, calculated in an opt-in/privacy-protecting way.
Not just the median, the whole distribution.
Not just the income, the savings minus debt.
1) Fintech apps already have much of this data 2) States like Estonia & Singapore have national ID systems via e-identity & Singpass that can serve as primary key 3) Histograms can be calculated in privacy-preserving way, eg: link.springer.com/article/10.114…
Our current metrics for society are bad because they are easily gamed and aren't granular enough.
Society doesn't necessarily prosper as a whole if the stock market goes up. But it would if the (inflation-adjusted) net worth histogram was right-shifted.
Concept: what if your community newspaper was re-centered around a community dashboard?
It addresses the ADD aspect of news judgment. Rather than random stories every day, your community would instead track metrics over time, like $ saved or time working out. And improve them.
Any company beyond a certain scale has a set of dashboards that the CEO and all execs review each day. Examples below.
The point of tracking metrics over time, and centering the morning on them, is that it gives long-term memory and focus.
The day doesn't start with random stories from a newspaper. The day starts with visualizing shared long-term goals, and tracking actions against those goals.
Just repeat what everyone else is saying. If it's proven wrong, well, everyone was wrong together. The establishment's consensus algorithm. Works until falsified by the outside world.
When is the School of Fish Strategy less effective?
In engineering, business, and war. The ability to manufacture consensus *within* your social network only partially overlaps with the skills necessary to build products, sell products, and win wars.
Consensus is still fairly important in those areas. You do need to manage teams.
But it's related to the distinction between political truths and technical truths. Is it true if others think it’s true? Or is it true regardless of what people think?
The borders between nation states are visible, but the overlap between social networks is not.
We can see the physical border between France & Germany on a map. We can't visualize the border between Twitter & Facebook. Which people are on the border, with accounts on both sites?
It's not just digital borders that are invisible, it's digital citizenship.
States can list the dual citizens of the US and Germany, but no one has the list of all dual holders of BTC and ETH.
This is how the pseudonymous economy leads to an encrypted world.
Old maps had genuine terra incognita. Places outside the ken of the civilization mapping them, mysterious places supposedly marked by "here be dragons". The phrase is apocryphal [1], but the concept is not.