Although there are issues with waning immunity, current COVID-19 vaccines offer excellent protection. But this might not always be the case. Future variant-specific boosters may preferentially boost responses to the original strain and be less effective.🧵
cell.com/trends/immunol…
The theory works like this: a person exposed to strain A of the virus (either by vaccination or infection) may prime their immune system such that the ability to make future antibodies specific to a future strain (strain B) is reduced.

This is known as immune imprinting.
In that scenario, a vaccine booster for strain B will give some protection against the new strain B, but the immune system will preferentially produce antibodies against the original strain A.

In certain situations, this has the potential to be harmful.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_…
It is possible that immune imprinting will not turn out to be a significant problem with SARS-CoV-2, and/or it may be possible to design better vaccines that limit this issue.
While the authors of the article linked to at the start of this thread hope that immune imprinting will not be a major problem, they warn that we must take the possibility of future problems seriously.
It’s very important to understand that this is NOT an argument against vaccination.

Immune imprinting also occurs with infection (and you get COVID-19 as well).

Vaccination remains extremely important. Everyone should get vaccinated if they have the opportunity.
However, we need to think about how we can get the most benefit out of the vaccines we have today.

That means we mustn’t rely on vaccines alone to end the pandemic. We need a #VaccinesPlus strategy: vaccination plus some ongoing (and hopefully unobtrusive) low-level mitigations.
We need to use vaccines PLUS things like ventilation improvements in our public buildings.

Improved sanitation was one of the greatest contributors to the increased life expectancy we enjoy today. Nowadays, clean water is taken for granted in most countries.
Today, we need to take the next step and ensure that everyone has access to clean air.

This will reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and also protect us from future pandemics.
It’s very unlikely that we will completely eradicate SARS-CoV-2, because the virus has animal reservoirs.

But we can keep transmission to low levels with a #VaccinesPlus strategy.

This will save lives, protect economies, and reduce the risk of new variants emerging.
By reducing the risk of new variants emerging, we can also lower the risk of running into problems with immune imprinting. This will ensure that we can depend on vaccines to deliver a high level of protection into the future.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Zoë Hyde

Dr Zoë Hyde Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrZoeHyde

21 Sep
Study of people with mild or moderate (but not hospitalised) COVID-19 from the first wave in Geneva. 7-9 months later, at least 25% had >=1 persisting symptom. Most common: fatigue (14%); loss of smell/taste (11%); headache (7%); shortness of breath (8%).
acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
Note: These proportions were calculated using the entire study sample as the denominator. However, one-third of people were lost to follow-up and their health status was unknown. It’s therefore possible that the proportion of people experiencing persistent symptoms was higher.
Of those with fatigue, 27% said they were limited in strenuous activity. 60% of those with shortness of breath experienced this when walking up a slight hill or when hurrying. Most people with headache or loss of smell or taste reported at least moderate symptoms.
Read 4 tweets
14 Sep
This is a pre-print, and needs to be interpreted carefully, but if it's correct the implications are concerning.

From about mid-2020, SARS-CoV-2 began to evolve at a faster rate, and is now evolving faster than influenza. Whether this will continue is unclear.
The authors suggest two theories for this, both of which could be true.

First, certain mutations could "unlock" new space for further mutations to occur. This seems quite likely: the virus has only just started to adapt to humans
Second, selection pressure could be driving an increase in mutations. Think of the first wave in Manaus, Brazil, where people thought herd immunity had been reached. A second wave followed, as the virus evaded immunity and got better at infecting people.
Read 5 tweets
26 Aug
For those overseas wondering what’s going on in Australia, we have NOT given up on zero COVID.

All states and territories, except one, continue to try to suppress the virus while we vaccinate.

Incredibly, the government of NSW has gone rogue and is pushing a UK-style approach.
In contrast to other parts of Australia, the NSW government refused to lockdown when the delta variant was first detected in the community, and implemented restrictions only grudgingly.

The contrast between NSW and where I live speaks volumes.

We have no known transmission.
Unfortunately, I fear the negligence of the NSW government will affect us eventually.

It will be harder to keep COVID-19 out now, and we still have many people to vaccinate.

This is the second major problem we face. Our cheapskate federal government didn’t buy enough vaccines.
Read 4 tweets
23 Aug
At what level of vaccination can Australia safely reopen?

With 70% of adults vaccinated, expect:
📈 6.9 million cases
🏥 154,000 hospitalisations
☠️ 29,000 deaths

At 80%:
☠️ 25,000 deaths
🤒 270,000 people with long COVID

We need >90%, including children, to be safe.
#auspol
Children & adolescents must be included to reopen safely. If we don’t vaccinate them we can expect thousands of deaths from vaccine breakthrough infections.

Children also benefit directly from vaccination.

75% vaccination in children would prevent 12,000 child hospitalisations.
These figures are the results of new modelling produced by @GraftonQuentin, @Tom_Kompas, John Parslow, & me.

We explored what would happen when the final stage of the National Plan is reached, where it’s proposed to manage COVID-19 like flu.

Read more: policyforum.net/australia-cann…
Read 21 tweets
21 Aug
Study of vaccine effectiveness in New York (51% received Pfizer-BNT, 40% Moderna, and 9% J&J). Protection against symptomatic infection decreased over 3 months from 92% to 80% (likely delta variant effect) but hospitalisation protection maintained at ~95%.
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
During the course of the study, the prevalence of the delta variant increased from <2% to more than 80% in the area in which the study was conducted.

This seems like the most likely reason for the decrease in effectiveness against symptomatic infection.
This study demonstrates the importance of continuing public health measures, such as improving ventilation and using masks in public places, until very high levels of vaccination are achieved in the population.
Read 6 tweets
10 Aug
I'm shocked this piece was published. Not because I disagree, but because it contains statements which are misleading or inaccurate.

Do you think children should be offered vaccination?

Please vote in the poll accompanying the article, and leave a comment on the website.
The authors state about 2 per million children have died in England, but the denominator is the entire population!

Correcting for virus exposure, the death rate is 5 per 100,000.

One of the authors knows this because they analysed these data! @MJA_Editor
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
The authors also state that "[r]outine vaccination of well teenagers aged 12–15 years adds little to the reduction in COVID-19 transmission through the community."

This is false.

While there is some debate about how much children transmit, adolescents transmit just like adults.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(