POTENTIAL METHODS:
- Grant Allocation (DAO to Guild to Project to Member)
- Role Based 'Salary' (UBI, (opt by level or skill xp)
- Subjective Contribution (e.g. via Coordinape)
- Objective Network Activity (e.g. via SourceCred)
CHALLENGES:
- Incentivize top contributors
- Create stability for contributors
- Simplify contributor experience
- Minimal overhead
- Avoid bias (extrovert vs. introvert vs. background)
Additional Compensation Challenges:
- Aggregation of governance to selected individuals
- How to incentivize Genesis members
- How to incentivize a balance of activities
Additions:
- Forgot to add Bounty payments (a type of “grant” one might say)
- We haven’t talked about “dividend” payouts as a result of treasury diversification growth and success
- It is possible such that governance token cannot be exchanged for coin unless treasury buyout.
- There is no one-size fits all, the advantage of web3 is actually The ability to adjust the structure to best incentivise the context, while minimising bias
- Many new tools will emerge and help diversify the way we pay people: so it aligns with their preferences and needs.
Ok, so I'd like to add a plug-in to my website (currently in Notion) where people can purchase a set of services via crypto?
Let's say for example, someone wanted to buy a 1-hour advisory/coaching session.
1. They would go to my website 2. Browse 2-3 types of services (e.g. chat, interview, research) 3. Purchase via crypto transaction a token redeemable via burn for the service (edition NFT?)
I think theoretically I could use Mirror for this, but putting the token (or NFTish asset) in escrow, with post-meeting proof of burn agreement would be ideal when the session is booked.
“We are desperate for Creator platforms in HR: we want to create learning content, employee journeys, feedback systems, back-to-work tools, reporting and analytics interfaces, and lots of communication and change programs….
We don’t want HR Tech platforms that “do what is designed” – we want systems that let us create our own content, our own customizations, and our own innovative ideas. So in many ways, all HR Tech platforms are becoming “Creator Systems.”
- Tipping and shoutouts for good work, democratised across the org
- Integration of customers into shared digital spaces with the company
- Transparency in all components of the org, all metrics across all teams
- Minimal mobility friction between jobs, let ppl follow their muse
- Option for part-time participation across multiple orgs (this is advanced mode)
- Internal payment market for high-need activities (eg bonuses for high-demand work)
- Encouragement / expectation that each employee is building their own personal knowledge management system
Some thoughts on Social DAO token price appreciation:
Need to solve for two problems: 1. Sustainable growth 2. Community freshness
My take is that the current community will need to create sponsor relationships: One member can “host” up to X others with a derivative access token that decays over Y period of time.
Only the holder of the OG membership can mint these decaying passes.
- Hodler Segmentation
- Community Engagement
- Production Alignment
- Governance Participation
- Contributor Profiling
- Partnership & Ecosystem
- Community Dynamism
- Bounty Lead Time and Turnover
Shortcut: volume of discussion on token price vs. production
Metrics:
- % of token holders by reputation
- Messages per hour, reaction mix
- # of in-flight projects, % intermix
- % of membership voting, by proposal type
- Contributor reputation mix, hours per week attention, values cohesion
- Inter-DAO informal agreements, member overlap…