1/ A quick thread on the five new cases the Supreme Court agreed to hear this morning. ⬇️
2/ The campaign-finance case, FEC v. Cruz, is a challenge from Ted Cruz to a federal law that limits how (and how much) a candidate can loan money to his or her campaign and then recoup that money after the election. More on the case here: scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
3/ Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Foundation involves procedural issues under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act in a case in which the family of a Holocaust survivor seeks the return of art stolen by the Nazis.
scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
4/ In Concepcion v. United States, the justices will again revisit the topic of sentencing reductions under the First Step Act, the criminal justice reform law passed in 2018. This case involves what a trial court must consider in handing down a reduced sentence.
5/ Shurtleff v. Boston involves a First Amendment case about the city of Boston's refusal to allow a Christian organization to briefly fly a flag on a city hall flag pole, despite allowing other private civic groups to fly their flags.
6/ And finally, Boechler v. CIR involves, well, a technical issue in a tax case. Specifically: "Whether the time limit in Section 6330(d)(1) is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule subject to equitable tolling."
7/ The court took no action this morning on some of the most high-profile pending cert petitions, including a Second Amendment challenge to a New Jersey ban on high-capacity magazines and two cases on state laws restricting abortions of fetuses with Down syndrome.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SCOTUSblog

SCOTUSblog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SCOTUSblog

27 Aug
BREAKING: The Supreme Court lifts the federal eviction moratorium. In an unsigned 8-page opinion (with the three liberals dissenting), SCOTUS sides with a group of landlords who argued that the CDC lacked the authority to bar evictions during the pandemic.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The majority says that the CDC, in barring evictions, relied on "a decades-old statute that authorizes it to implement measures like fumigation and pest extermination."

"It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the sweeping authority that it asserts."
This is the second time the eviction moratorium has been at SCOTUS this summer. In June, the court allowed the prior version of the moratorium to remain in place through July. But on Aug. 3, the CDC renewed it for two additional months, and this time SCOTUS decides to halt it.
Read 4 tweets
2 Jul
NEW: The Supreme Court adds nine new cases to next term's docket, including. Here's the full order list: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor….

And here’s a thread on each of the cases the court agreed to hear:
In Carson v. Makin, the court will revisit the interaction of state tuition-assistance programs and religious education. The case involves a Maine program that bars students from using public tuition aid to attend private religious schools. scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In Cummings v. Premier, the court will hear the case of a deaf woman who is seeking damages for emotional distress from a health care provider that refused to provide her with an ASL interpreter. The issue is whether those damages are available under the relevant statutes.
Read 17 tweets
1 Jul
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court issues ruling in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, major voting-rights case out of Arizona. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
BREAKING NEWS: In 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS upholds two Arizona voting provisions: a ban on so-called "ballot harvesting," and a policy that throws out an entire ballot if it was cast in the wrong precinct. Challengers argued that both provisions discriminate against minority voters.
Justice Alito writes the majority opinion joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

Justice Kagan dissents joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
In a dispute over a controversial proposed natural-gas pipeline through New Jersey, the Supreme Court rules in favor of the pipeline company. SCOTUS says Jersey does not have sovereign immunity from the company's attempts to seize state-owned property along the pipeline route.
Here's the opinion in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey: supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
That is the third and final opinion of the day.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jun
The Supreme Court adds two new cases to next term's docket. Here's the full order list: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor….
In City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc., the court will consider whether Austin's sign ordinance violated the First Amendment by treating "off-premises" billboards differently from "on-premises" signs.

Here is more about the case: scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
In Patel v. Garland, the court will hear an appeal from a man who entered the U.S. without authorization in 1992 and is now seeking to avoid deportation and obtain a green card under a provision of immigration law that provides for discretionary relief in certain circumstances.
Read 9 tweets
17 Jun
BREAKING: The court rules in favor of a Catholic social services organization that sued Philadelphia after the city excluded it from a foster-care program due to the organization's refusal to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the court joined in full by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh and Barrett.
Justice Barrett wrote separately to concur joined by Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Breyer (in all but the first paragraph). Alito and Gorsuch both filed separate concurring opinions. Alito's joined by Gorsuch and Thomas. Gorsuch's joined by Alito and Thomas.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(