In the Battle of Yamama, after each duel Khalid ibn-al-Waleed would recite his own extemporized verses:
"I am the son of many chiefs.
My sword is sharp and terrible.
It is the mightiest of things
When the pot of war boils fiercely."
[Thumamah bin Uthal, a Companion from the tribe of Musaylimah told Musaylimah:
"Musaylimah! Recant - do not contend,
For in prophethood you have not been given a share.
You lied about Allah regarding His revelation
And your desires are the whims of a stupid fool..
..Your people have indulged you instead of preventing you,
But if Khalid comes to them you will be abandoned.
Then you will have no stairway to the heavens
And no path to travel in the earth."
"What an excellent slave of Allah: Khalid ibn al-Walid, one of the swords of Allah, unleashed against the unbelievers!" Prophet Muhammad (SAWS)
Ref: Tirmidhi and Ahmad from Abu Hurayrah, Sahih Al-Jami’ Al-Saghir No. 6776.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Since talks with TTP are being debated, hence in this thread I will focus on TTP based on these factors.
For any insurgency to sustain and be successful, it depends on the following factors: 1. Ideology 2. Local support/manpower 3. Financial and military support (Foreign)
Many mistakenly think that TTP demand of imposition of Shariah got them support across Pak hence they managed to wreak havoc.
Note: This point is not for or against the imposition of Shariah but to clarify TTP's phenomenal rise to a brutal insurgency..
..wasn't directly linked to Shariah's demand. There were, still are many groups (violent and non-violent) in Pak that demand the imposition of Shariah but no one got even close to TTP.
TTP derives its ideology & rallying cry from anti-US sentiments..
Some background on Ismail Khan:
Ismail Khan was an Army officer in the Afghan Army, stationed in Herat garrison, in early 1979 when Afghan President Taraki pushed for reforms and went after opposition, Afghans in rural areas revolted.
On 17th Mach 1979, the entire 17th division station in Herat mutinied, led by Capt Ismail Khan.
As the population killed Soviets officers, advisers, and their families, Ismail Khan staged a coup in the city garrison, killing Soviet and communist Afghan officers..
..and distributing arms to the people. Kabul regime and Moscow, fearing more uprisings in other Afghan cities, sent reinforcements and began to bomb one of the oldest cities in the world indiscriminately. They inflicted more damage on the city than even the Mongols has done.
Pashtuns in Pak outnumber Pashtuns in Afghanistan by at least 2.5 to 1. As per the 2017 census, there r more than 37 million Pakistanis whose mother tongue is Pashtu. Whereas Afghanistan has not more than 15 million Pashtun population.
The actual Pashtun population in Pakistan..
..is much higher due to centuries of Pashtun migrations to different parts of present-day Pakistan, where they settled & gradually stop using Pashto as their language, like the Sadozais of Multan or Kashmir, Kakazais of Lahore & Niazis of Mianwali.
Pakistani Pashtuns are..
living in all four provinces & AJK, completely amalgamated in the social fabric while participating and representing in all walks of life.
Karachi is home to the largest metropolitan Pashtun population in the world -- then in Kabul, Kandhar & Jalalabad combined.
In this thread I will share some facts to ascertain if PM criticism to Musharaf's and PPP Govts policy wrt WoT is valid or not?
PM IK in his NA speech mentioned that the US and West did not treat us like partners and never acknowledged Pak's sacrifices in WoT instead kept demanding "Do more". PM also criticized some of the policies of Gen Musharaf and PPP Govts.
Before I start, its important to mention that Musharaf tried to persuade Taliban to either handover OBL or banish him from AFG, Mullah Omer refused to do both despite Pak's DG-ISI meeting him personally 3-4 times before the US invasion trying to convince him to let go OBL.
Pak not once elected Mullahs to power. Whereas India despite being a secular state, ruled by the(so-called)secular party for over 50-years is a Hindu Rashtra.
India's forefathers used secularism as a tool to subjugate others, Jinnah called their bluff & proven right time & again.
Congress&BJP both adhere to "Secularism" but both use it as a tool to keep Muslim,non-muslim and scheduled casts subjugated.
BJP membership form requires the taking of a pledge that contains the line: "I subscribe to the concept of secular state & nation not based on religion."
It's just that BJP is more vocal about 'Hindu Rashtra' than congress. During Congress tenured, there were scores of state-sponsored pogroms not only against Muslims but also against Sikhs killing thousands.