On the BBC website Laura Kuenssberg has written a gushing adulation of Keir Starmer's performance at #LabourConference2021 which concludes with the assertion that "Keir Starmer has shown a strong conviction to win".

THREAD
It's such a bizarrely flattering interpretation of events, especially given the way Kuenssberg was caught red-handed creating fake news about Starmer's predecessor (a breech of impartiality that she should've been sacked for).

anotherangryvoice.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-la…

2/
Kuenssberg has switched from creating elaborate 'fake news' deceptions to attack one Labour leader with, to writing reverential venerations of his floundering successor!

People will have their own explanations as to why.

3/
Keir Starmer's main focus at Labour Conference was rigging the nomination process to exclude the Labour left, and women, and people of colour from the contest to decide who replaces him as Labour leader.



4/
What kind of "winner" fixates on rigging the process to select their successor, rather than their actual job of taking the fight to the government?

5/
And what kind of "winner" is so insecure in the popularity of their own ideology that they need to rig the process to ensure that their rivals are simply banished from the marketplace of ideas?

6/
Then there's Starmer's lamentable track record in elections:

❗ Losing the Labour stronghold of Hartlepool

❗ Local election hammering

❗ Labour's worst ever performance in Scotland

❗ The worst by-election result in Labour Party history in Chesham and Amersham (1.6%)

7/
Then there's the fact that Starmer is dreadfully unpopular with the public (despite the easy ride he gets from the media).

People just see that he's done an absolutely pitiful job of holding this corrupt and malicious Tory government to account.



8/
The majority of British people want Starmer to quit immediately.

The majority of Labour voters want Starmer to quit immediately.

The majority of the Tory voters he's been courting so pathetically want Starmer to quit immediately.



9/
The only demographic that seems to adore Keir Starmer are the tiny Lib-Dem 8%ers, and they're supporters of the party of political losers!

10/
Then there's the fact that Starmer freely admitted to the BBC that he lied to everyone's faces during the Labour leadership election in order to con people into voting for him with a load of promises that he has no intention of keeping.



11/
Starmer's a profoundly unpopular leader, who's outright admitted that he's a liar, with a dreadful track record of electoral failure, who's so obsessed with rigging the selection of his successor that he can't even be bothered to do the job he's supposed to ...

12/
yet somehow Laura Keunssberg has decided to portray Starmer as a committed winner!
It's such a bizarre reality-reversed interpretation of what's been going on that it actually tells us something interesting about the mainstream media mind-manipulators.

13/
It's such an absurd reality-reversal that it's impossible that they don't know it themselves.

But hacks like Laura are so arrogant and drunk on their own power, that they think they can convince the public to believe literally anything, no matter how nonsensical.

14/
According to Laura and the rest of the groupthink-riddled UK political hacks, Starmer's speech wasn't an over-long borefest full of disingenuous rhetoric and self-awareness fails, which was only enlivened by the heckling, it was a glorious triumph!



15/
And Starmer isn't a deeply unpopular empty suit with no integrity, no charisma, no desire to hold the Tories to account, no strategic nous, and no willingness to even acknowledge the way he's badly let people down by abstaining rather than opposing for the last 18 months.

16/
Starmer's not the thing that anyone with any sense can see that he is, he's the polar opposite, he's a proven leader with a "strong conviction to win"!

And if the mind-manipulators can make you believe that, they can make you believe anything.

17/17

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Another Angry Voice

Another Angry Voice Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Angry_Voice

29 Sep
I watched Keir Starmer's interminable #LabourConference21 speech so that you don't have to.

Here's my report (THREAD):
Keir Starmer's cheerleaders in the corporate media insisted that this would be the speech that would stop all the navel-gazing about the past, look to the future, and turn around his lamentable and profoundly unpopular systematic abstention of a leadership so far.

2/
But it turned out to be just another over-long, backwards-looking, boring speech, lazily rehashing the same tropes he's repeatedly resorted to in the past, that was only enlivened by bouts of heckling from the audience.

/3
Read 39 tweets
29 Sep
Keir Starmer has told the BBC that he has no intention of honouring the 10 pledges he made during the Labour leadership election, especially his multiply-repeated commitment to renationalise the UK energy sector.

THREAD
The narrative Keir Starmer attempts to use to justify tearing up his promises is an absolute masterclass in deception and disingenuousness.

2/
Starmer attempts to create a contrast between the promises like energy renationalisation that he made to Labour Party members, and the nebulous concept of "electability", as if there's some fundamental contradiction between keeping his word, and winning elections.

3/
Read 19 tweets
28 Sep
Much has been made of Labour's Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves saying that she won't consider nationalisation of energy companies as an option, even as the privatised energy industry collapses into chaos around us.

1/
A clear majority of the UK public favour energy renationalisation (and public ownership of most other strategically crucial infrastructure and services too), so by ruling it out Rachel Reeves is defying the public will.

2/
The UK should run its own energy infrastructure for the benefit of the British people, rather than allowing it to be operated as wealth-extraction by a shambolic mix of corporate profiteers & foreign governments, so by ruling out renationalisation she's defying common sense.

3/
Read 16 tweets
26 Sep
Labour just shamefully voted through Keir Starmer's anti-democratic nomination-rigging rule change by 53% to 47% (after a mass purge of left-wing delegates in the weeks before conference).

THREAD
Starmer's new nomination-rigging rule change means any future Labour leadership candidate will have to get the backing of 20% of the party's inner cabal of MPs.

2/
The reason Starmer chose 20% is that the socialist campaign group (which tries to keep Labour true to its founding socialist principles) amount to 17% of the party's MPs.

3/
Read 12 tweets
26 Sep
09:00: Keir Starmer goes on TV to publicly rip up his leadership election pledge to renationalise the energy sector.

13:00: Labour Party conference overwhelmingly votes in favour of renationalising the energy sector.

What a humiliating rebuke!

THREAD
This conference vote is a humiliating rebuke for Starmer, and yet another reason for him to drop this betrayal, and just follow through on the unambiguous promises he made to get himself elected as party leader.

2/
Energy renationalisation is a very popular policy with the UK public, so if Starmer continues to insist on opposing it, he's not doing it for popularity, he's doing it to suck up to the mega-rich who want to keep their access to all their privatised industry money troughs.

3/
Read 8 tweets
25 Sep
Having failed in his plot to stitch up the Labour leadership election process, Keir Starmer is now trying to stitch up the nomination process instead, by doubling the number of MPs needed to back a leadership candidate from 10% to 20% of the Parliamentary Labour Party.

THREAD
Starmer and the factionalist ghouls he's surrounded himself with are freely admitting that this rule change is intended to block anyone from outside their Westminster establishment cabal from even standing in a Labour leadership election again, let alone becoming leader.

2/
Starmer and the Labour-right have basically got so little faith in themselves winning the political argument, that they're rigging the system so that nobody from outside their closed-shop cabal can ever even participate.

3/
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(