On Mon. October 4, USTR Katherine Tai will give a speech to "lay out initial steps of the Biden Administration’s approach to realign the bilateral trade relationship with China."
Here are DATA summarizing the current US-China trade relationship...
Average US tariffs on imports from China remain elevated at 19.3%, more than six times higher than before the trade war began in 2018.
Average Chinese tariffs on imports from the United States also remain elevated at an average of 20.7%, up from 8%.
3/
Due to the trade war, US tariffs now cover around $335 billion, or 66.4%, of Chinese exports to the United States (when matched to 2017 data).
China’s retaliatory tariffs continue to cover $90 billion, or 58.3%, of US exports to China.
4/
Under the "historic" Phase One agreement that President Trump signed with China in January 2020, China committed to import an additional $200 billion of US goods and services over 2020 and 2021.
China's purchases are not close to those legal commitments.
5/
In 2020, China came up more than 40% short of reaching the annual legal commitment.
(It reached 59% of the commitment using US export statistics, and only 58% of the commitment using Chinese import statistics. The legal text says to evaluate relying on both trade statistics)
6/
Why did China not reach 2020 commitments? Product-specific stories:
Some - semiconductors, COVID-19 related medical supplies, pork, corn, cotton, wheat - did well 😀
Others - aircraft, autos, energy, soybeans, sorghum, lobster, other ag - did not ☹️ piie.com/blogs/trade-an…
7/
Thus far through 2021, China is still coming up more than 30% short of reaching the year-to-date purchase targets.
(Latest data is through August 2021. So we are 5/6 of the way through the 2 year Phase One purchase commitments.)
8/
Through August 2021, China's purchases are still short of explicit year-to-date targets for each sector covered by the Phase One agreement:
• Agriculture: only 89% of target
• Manufacturing: only 61% of target
• Energy: only 42% of target
When the EU retaliated against Trump's tariffs in 2018, it did so under the argument that Trump's national security tariffs were a "safeguard measure in disguise"... 2/
PITTSBURGH, PA: There is an item that is not on the US -EU TTC agenda which is actually really quite pressing — Trump-era US tariffs on European steel and aluminium.
On Friday, trade beat reporters for multiple media outlets reported that the Biden administration was considering a new "Section 301" unfair trade investigation of China.
This one reportedly would examine China's industrial subsidies. 1/
The Biden administration is targeting Beijing’s widespread use of industrial subsidies that give its companies an edge over foreign rivals