Living wages are not an “entitlement.” Housing & health care are not “entitlements.” Taking care of climate is not “entitlement.” These are all human rights.
.@Sen_JoeManchin, You claim to be a person of faith. Have you ever even read your Bible? Have you read the Constitution? Promoting the general welfare is not an “entitlement.” Establishing justice is not an “entitlement.”
That entitlement language is from the racist southern strategy. You seem to believe in entitlement as long as it’s for corporations, the greedy rich, your friends, and your own pockets.
What you don’t seem to believe in is lifting the poor & low-wealth people of your own state, 750,000 people, 92% of which are white. So stop using the race language of entitlement while you are hurting poor and low-wealth white people in your own state!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In June 2020, 2.7 million people tuned in to our Mass Poor People’s & Low-Wage Workers Assembly. Next year, we will invite all of them to join us on June 18 in person to Washington, DC.
The struggle to just take a step in the right direction with the Build Back Better Plan, & the failure to take a step toward a living wage to lift poor & low-wealth “essential” workers are signs we must mobilize & make them hear us!
Democrats’ & Republicans’ lives depend on it. Communities depend on it. Political games & catering to corporate interests cost the lives of 700 people who die every day from poverty.
I agree w/ @JulianCastro: “The continued use of Title 42 is a glaring failure by this administration. Its continued use will not only hurt people who are seeking a better life, but risks the collapse of the Democratic coalition that elected Joe Biden.” But here is my concern:
Why wasn’t there the same outrage when the commitment to $15/hr minimum wage was abandoned and left 40% of Black workers & 32 million total Americans in poverty & low-wealth, which is a brutal former of existence that whips and beats people down but without cameras watching?
The same with healthcare and police reform. There should be outrage, but too much of this Washington outrage only comes when something is captured on camera that jars our sensibilities.
While we are waiting for a response from the White House, please pray for me. As a representative from the #PoorPeoplesCampaign: A National Call for Moral Revival, I’ve been invited by the Vatican to join other moral religious leaders at a poverty-focused conference,
hosted by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences on October 3-4. I am honored to be delivering a talk on “Coalition-building and bridging religious communities for poverty mitigation.”
In his most recent encyclical, @Pontifex wrote that the “magic theories” of market capitalism, trickle-down economics, and neo-liberalism have failed and that the world needs a new type of politics that “promotes dialogue and solidarity and rejects war at all costs.”
This is a sad moment in America. The issue is not who will back down, moderates or progressives? The question is: Do we truly love and care for the 140 million poor and low-wealth people in this country?
Do we care about workers who need living wages, the sick who need healthcare, the children who need education?
The first question should not be how much can we afford to spend? We have the money. We spent $21 trillion in war since 9/11.
The question is, how much do we care about promoting the general welfare of all people? How much do we care about the poor who are made poor by policy decisions? How much do we care about those from the mountains of Appalachia and the delta of Mississippi?
The filibuster has been used in bad ways, and for Sen. Manchin to continue to use it is wrong.
Nothing was wrong with the For The People Act, which the late Rep. John Lewis actually wrote. We don’t need Manchin’s “Freedom to Vote Act.” Voting is a right, not a freedom.
There’s no national voter ID requirement in the new Senate bill, but there’s a dangerous gateway to legitimizing existing voter ID laws in states.
Why is Manchin using Trumpian language in the “Freedom to Vote Act” to suggest voter ID is OK in order to “restore confidence,” which feeds the lie? Voter ID needs to be taken out.
We fought NC’s voter ID requirement in court and proved it was discriminatory to people of color, women, and the poor, both in intent and in impact. And it was unnecessary, because we already had signature attestation.