1/ Medium thread on #SARSCoV2's furin cleavage site and a strikingly similar region in some of the new BANAL genomes from Lao, and in RmYN02 from China.

Seems worth trying to clear up the confusion of @ydeigin on this issue (even it means broadcasting my pic, below).
2/ The furin cleavage site of SC2 is the RRAR in the NSPRRAR stretch of amino acids in the alignment I'm holding up there. It is what makes the virus 'pop' in humans.

The BANAL viruses have NSPAAR. A couple other ones, including RmYN02, have NSPAAR or NSPVAR.
3/ So, having barely scratched the surface of the genetic diversity of these viruses in the wild, we've found several that are literally a *single* amino acid away from having a furin cleavage site.

For example: (NSP) ->inserted R<- AAR.
4/ Regardless of how these genes are aligned with one another on our computers, this is true.

It is also clear that this region of the Spike protein is *highly* prone to insertions and deletions.
5/ Bat populations are like a vast bank of slot machines, and nature is pulling those arms down over and over, day in and day out, coming up with endless variations.

It is likely that a slight tweak of something like a BANAL Spike gave rise to RRAR in a bat.
6/ Though of no relevance in the bat, that motif allowed that virus to hit the jackpot when it got into humans, most likely through intermediate hosts like raccoon dogs sold in wet markets.
7/ That's the big picture. What about the minor question of how these stretches of the spike gene should be aligned?

Yuri's proposal is possibly the least parsimonious scenario I have ever seen to explain a stretch of nucleotides.
8/ By my count, it would require 10 mutations in an 18-nucleotide stretch. This is more differences than expected if you compare two randomly generated stretches of 18 nucleotides! Plus (for the aficionados), 5 would be transversions.
9/ Seems a lot less likely than a couple 'indels' in a region with lots of recombination.
10/ Again, no matter how a BANAL virus genome is aligned against others, that Spike protein contains NSPAAR, and is just one amino acid insertion away from a minimal furin cleavage site.
11/10 As @arambaut has pointed out, it is possible that NSPRRAR and NSPAAR are not homologous. But with respect to the origin of a furin cleavage site, homology does not matter.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Worobey

Michael Worobey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MichaelWorobey

15 Sep
1: A thread connecting the dots between:

(1) @PeterDaszak et al's fascinating recent preprint on the *many* SARS-related CoV infections in humans per year in Southeast Asia, and

(2) The furin cleavage site of SARS-CoV-2, and

(3) Why Wuhan?

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
2: The study uses a clever combination of data streams to estimate that 400,000 people per year are being infected by SARS-related coronaviruses.
3: The authors note that not all of those infections are likely to be transmissible human to human

I strongly agree with this. We would see multiple new pandemic origins every year if even 0.1% of these were viable human to human pathogens.
Read 15 tweets
4 Sep
1: I want to follow up the thread below with some additional clarification of why we hypothesize that there may be no real #SARSCoV2 genomes transitional between lineages A and B.

2: @daoyu15 has written a thread asserting that we "toss any genomes that don't fit your conclusions away". I'm afraid this is incorrect on multiple counts.

3: What we show is that many of the putatively transitional genomes bear obvious evidence of being artefacts - probably due to bioinformatic pipelines, rather than sequencing errors per se. (Issues like calling a site with poor coverage to be the base of a reference genome.)
Read 13 tweets
4 Sep
1: We have just posted a study suggesting there may be no real #SARSCoV2 genomes that are transitional between lineages A and B. Arcane, right?

But stick with me - this stuff is *absolutely* crucial to figuring out how the pandemic got started.

virological.org/t/evidence-aga…
2: Honoured to be working on this project with an *amazing* team: @jepekar, @EdythParker, Jennifer Havens, @suchard_group, Kristian Andersen, @niemasd, @arambaut, and Joel Wertheim (leading the charge).

So, what's a 'transitional' genome?
3: To explain, let me introduce you to 'lineage A' and 'lineage B', aka 'clade II' and 'clade I', respectively, in this paper by Zhang et al. These lineages co-circulated in China during the early days of the pandemic, and they differ at two key sites.

nature.com/articles/s4158…
Read 33 tweets
28 Aug
1/4: Good piece from @NPR on the declassified summary of the 90-day intelligence community (IC) review on the origin of #SARSCoV2.

npr.org/2021/08/27/103…
2/4: A little soundbite from me:

[Worobey] would like to see the scientific and intelligence communities collaborate on the problem. "I would hope and assume that this 90-day sprint is going to turn into a nice long jog where there could be some back-and-forth."
3/4 Crucial point US IC elements agree on:

"China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of COVID-19 emerged".

So could we *please* collectively move on from claim that WIV database removal in Sept 2019 was part of a cover-up/conspiracy?
Read 4 tweets
8 Aug
SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 in Italy in September 2019: the most important finding yet on the origin of the pandemic*.

(*or an error with big consequences.)

A thread. 1/24

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
The study, led by Dr. Elisabetta Tanzi, also includes heavy-hitters of molecular evolution @sergeilkp and Sudhir Kumar. I greatly admire both but respectfully disagree with their conclusions here and feel it is important to explain why. 2/
Dr. Tanzi led an earlier study claiming to find evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in a boy in Northern Italy who presented with measles symptoms in Nov 2019. 3/

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27…
Read 26 tweets
22 Jul
Here I explain why I (continue to) think that a zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 is more likely than a lab leak scenario - even though I signed 'The Science Letter'. 1/
I am a co-author, with @jbloom_lab, @DavidRelman and others, of a widely discussed letter in Science Magazine that argues that both a zoonotic origin and a lab-linked origin are important to consider. 2/
science.sciencemag.org/content/372/65…
I'm also a co-author, with @edwardcholmes, @arambaut, @angie_rasmussen, @stgoldst, @robertson_lab, and others, of a recent preprint that argues that a zoonotic emergence is the more likely scenario. 3/
zenodo.org/record/5075888…
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(