My late father never said he was a survivor, he said he was an escapee of residential schools.

We were raised to believe being Indian was a gift and because of this we were empowered to stand for our people.

When we were kids we’d go to the states to visit my mom’s family (she
was from Yuma Arizona).

Once we stopped in Lethbridge for the night and my dad tried to get a room where the sign said vacancy. No rooms he was told.

We drove off and my dad called from a pay phone. “Yes we have a room”, he was told.

Then he called the police to come back to
that same motel and keep the peace so we could get a room.

I still remember my mom whispering to be quick and get inside because they didn’t want us here.

My mom was cautious. My dad stood his ground.

Today, I remember these times and I walk proudly. I am on the land of my
forefathers, the land gifted to MY people. I am not beaten. I am just starting to add my voice, to the song of this land.

It goes on with the hearts of our people - all of our ancestors speak in the rustle of leaves, in the swoosh of an eagle, in the rushing sound of water and
and in the howling noise of wind.

We are still here and we will always be part of this land.

#IyaheNakoda #FirstNations

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Ann Snow

Rachel Ann Snow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RachelAnnSnow

9 Dec 20
Bill C-15 (#UNDRIP) there is a huge difference between putting international law UNDER section 35 (Doctrine of discovery and canadian whiteman made law control) versus expanding section 35 (making canadian racist doctrine of discovery laws) to meet international standards.
Plus Bill C-15 says it will be under “a minister” - no specificity. Why would we agree to put the international laws into the hands of some rogue minister? Or is this a made for Perry position?

Treaty First Nations argue that our laws are international nation to nation
agreements. Why would we agree to put this higher level under canada’s constitution? Why?

Canada is trying to take our international arguments and put them into that section 35 box that has mind numbing tests where our people have to “PROVE” things like “we were here first.” 🤦🏽‍♀️
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(