1/🧵 💵 The US dollar is being held hostage. If we fail to raise (or eliminate) the debt ceiling, the dollar will be crushed. Only psychopaths would let this happen; but similar hostage situations have occurred before.
2/In 1892-1896, funds were desperately needed to relieve the plight of farmers affected by drought in the American west. Gold-fetishists refused to endorse “bimetallism,” but which would increase money supply by adding silver as currency.
3/In 1933, Roosevelt needed funds to pay for the New Deal, but the US lacked sufficient gold to back proposed programs. So he decoupled the dollar from gold and banned hoarding it, by executive order. The New Deal proceeded, shortening the depression.
4/In 1980, rich speculators unhappy with inflation began hoarding land and silver as a hedge against the dollar (it was illegal to buy gold). The Hunt Brothers tried and failed to corner the silver market; margin purchase requirements were raised, crashing the silver market.
5/Today, the spawn of Milton Friedman are back at it with Bitcoin, i.e. digital gold. They hope this time no one notices their attack. The goldbugs are now flirting with crashing the dollar in a self-fulfilling prophecy, to bolster “digital gold” and so-called “honest money.”
6/At root what this really is about is people who can’t stand the idea of bankers. And rich people who want to get richer by ensuring no one at all has any say over how money works. That’s no way to build a functional society. This is a misanthropic enterprise, at root.
7/But it gets worse. Hobbling the dollar and modern monetary theory makes it impossible for governments to fund the massive investments needed to wean us from carbon-based energy. So the carbon lobby has joined in on the attack. Goldbugs now have carbon interests on their side.
8/I’ve shared this with some extremely smart people and the only response I tend to get is “that’s a terrifying thought.” Worse, I’m confident that it’s correct. This is what’s going on. Ignore at our collective peril. Crypto/gold must be crushed, or at least put in a corner.
9/We have done before and we must do it again. People have not connected the dots as these things are presented as separate problems. But it’s all one problem. Time to see the relationships and start defending fiat currencies; it’s the only way to avoid cooking the planet.
10/If we continue to dither and hand-wave, rather than demand action from our governments, we will lose our habitat, for ourselves and our descendants. That’s what’s on the line. We need to take responsibility and act now.
And of course we shouldn’t forget the 1971 episode where European countries tried to corner the US gold reserve by accumulating convertible dollars. Nixon ended gold convertibility, quashing that move once and for all. So a new strategy was needed. Enter crypto.
In terms of things we might do to transition away from carbon quickly, thus talk offers a good set of suggestions. These are initiatives governments can be funding *now*.
According to Epik's data, their top-earning domain was 'noprescriptioncontacts\.com'; the reason it received so much traffic is because they direct a TON of other domains to it via domain forwarding. Many of them are related to pedophilia and bestiality.
The below domains, of 7,243 total, redirected to 'noprescriptioncontacts\.com' and contributed to Epik's revenue stream. This at least gives some sense of one of their strategies for building traffic and revenue. And apparently pedophilia and bestiality are fine.
One table appears to show a list of domains that Epik brokered for sale via escrow. These were the top domains over $1M in apparent value.
Seriously, if you want to understand one major source of where QAnon sprang from, read this.
And also know that Ballard was ripping off William Dudley Pelley’s silvershirts who did fascist grifting before him. This all goes back ~150 years to Theosophy.
The part the article doesn’t mention is that it never went away. It flourishes in new forms, in Ojai, in Montana and the west, and via people like JZ Knight. It is *everywhere* when you dig into the networks behind QAnon.
A couple of people had trouble with the archive link; use this LA Times link instead.
I’m here at the US Capitol this morning to observe what, if anything, may happen here today. Word is this will be a quiet day. I will report anything newsworthy or notable on this thread.
Anemic showing so far. More cops and media than demonstrators. Also a lot of dump trucks and snowplows.
LARP Moses is here. So far that’s about the most noteworthy development. He was talking about drinking beer.
Hey @ProcterGamble, can you please comment on your namesake and beneficiary @FosterGamble spouting hours of anti-Semitic COVID-denying conspiracies with David Icke on the 9/11 anniversary?
I explicitly do not want to amplify Gamble/Icke's message, so I've attached this link to their YouTube stream as secondary to my first tweet. And @YouTube please take down this hateful, insane nonsense.
In this stream, Icke claims that @ADL is a Mossad front. @splcenter this is also something you should be aware of. @ProcterGamble needs to forcefully disown their wayward scion, Foster Gamble.
Our disinformation crisis is rooted in the carbon economy's desire to continue uninterrupted, by destroying government and thus its ability to regulate it and invest in large-scale competitive solutions.
That's the tweet.
One reason Elon Musk and cryptocurrency are a focus right now is they are perceived as valves/chokepoints between carbon<>electric and fiat/gov<>private/scarce money.
Only gov/fiat investment can shut down carbon, so they want to shift to crypto/gold and limit fiat.
While government can not be tasked with countering activity covered by 1A/4A, there is nothing stopping coordinated private individuals from making life harder for those promoting disinfo, and making it cost more and be less effective. We need to coordinate such activity.
1/The purpose of tracking online disinformation is to determine who is producing it, and to try to stop it. At some point, this tracking and study necessarily begins to yield diminishing returns, as more is learned about the networks behind it.
2/Our efforts must, then, necessarily shift to exposing and countering the relatively compact networks behind these efforts, and dismantle their capability to build audiences and harm people. We need to make it too expensive and hard to be worthwhile.
3/I am concerned that many in the academic/technology industrial complex are too wedded to “study” to move into “countering,” and indeed it’s likely not their mission. What that means is academia is yielding reducing returns, and no one owns the problem of “countering.”