First, I've known Rich Clarida for years and he really is a good/decent person. I believe that he might be the victim or poor timing on his trades rather than something sinister like insider trading.
But, this is DC and Rich wanted to play.
2/9
The Fed knew his disclosure statement was bad. That is why the released it late on a Friday.
Confirming it was bad is Powell getting reappointed took a big hit this weekend.
Powell traded near 80% before the Clarida disclosure Fri PM and, as of this writing, he is 61%.
3/9
But maybe something more was going on here. The orange dots are the dates of Clarida public speeches. The blue line is a measure of inflation expectations.
Clarida was a regular speaking until mid-May. Since this he has given just one speech, back on Aug 4.
4/9
Rich is a big believer of inflation expectations so I thought he entered a version of witness protection because he was more hawkish and did not want to fight "transitory."
Now I'm wondering if they were hiding him because they knew of this bad news. Not good!
5/9
Rich should have resigned before his disclosure came out. Hiding was not the answer.
If he was self-muzzling because he is worried about inflation, and not his disclosure, and did not want to fight "transitory" that also should of led him to resign.
6/9
The Fed has to stop managing this, they need to clean house.
This includes Richmond Fed Pres Barkin sitting on millions of corp bonds (bought before 2020) and then voting to bail out the corp bond market. Another very bad look the Fed cannot/should not manage.
7/9
All of this is killing Powell and the Fed. Powell needs to clean house.
Then Powell needs to go through senior Fed staff disclosures and force them out too where necessary.
Again, they all decided to play in DC, these are the rules in that town.
8/9
Until this housing cleaning occurs, the credibility of the Fed and Powell sinks by the day.
9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Democrats met to try and come to a deal, Biden spoke to the D caucus late this afternoon, no reporters, and no mobile phones were allowed. So this account in Politico, which is sympathetic to Ds, comes from other Ds in the room.
1/6
The open!
President Biden deflated the air of urgency around a bipartisan infrastructure vote and tamped down liberal dreams of a $3.5 trillion spending bill in a speech before House Democrats Friday that left some members fuming.
-
He made it worse! 2/6
More and more it is looking like the Democrats are not able to agree among themselves. A thread on what is might mean for markets.
1/5
Moderate Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia has issued a statement over his refusal to back his party's $3.5 trillion spending plan, calling "trillions more on new and expanded government programs" the "definition of fiscal insanity"
Progressives want huge spending, moderates like Manchin, want far less.
Why can't they get on the same page? Maybe it has to do with the elephant in the room, the chart below. The leader of the Democrat party continues to implode, making a new low yet again today.
It's not what a default means for China. Rather it's what happened to China to cause a default.
Start with this chart. Economists are hacking China growth forecasts, and the downgrades are accelerating.
1/5
These downgrades are consistent with the Economic Strength Indices (ESI) compiled by our colleagues at @DataArbor . They measure incoming economic data versus its 1-year average.
China’s ESI has been falling and recently turned negative.
2/5
Currently, China (orange) is the only large economy with an ESI below zero.
While his appr rating might be bottoming (Gallup today at 43%, so we'll see), his disappr keeps making new highs.
In a polarized world where the vast majority will never chg their opinion (either way), this is a big move and only about 2% higher than Trump on election day.
2/4
Rs are saying "Ds, you do it"
Biden is going have to use his political capital to get Ds to pass spending/debt ceiling.
Again, see Biden's approval/disapproval chart above ... what political capital? It seems to be disappearing by the day.