When @JoyAnnReid looked right into the camera tonight straight-faced and call "bullsh!t," she was ice cold, dead right, as serious as a heart attack, and she didn't blink. That's because there was absolutely nothing funny or light-hearted in what she discussed.
She was talking about folks on the street who'll cease seeing the Supreme Court as illegitimate because they are behaving and performing like political hacks who don't give a damn about the public, and are enforcing their will to implement their ideological and political goals.
That was the segment of her show that followed @MalcolmNance and @AmandiOnAir putting out the clarion call about Steve Bannon's call for "shock troops," and Madison Cawthorn's recorded message calling for Christian Jihad. It a full-on call for war that deserves its own thread.
But the court majority are thin skinned because they are going to do what they want to because they have the uncheck, unabated power to do so, and they were put there for that purpose, they don't want any criticism for doing exactly what they are clearly doing.
And for some bizarre reason, that even extends to Stephen Breyer who, while still voting consistently against the conservatives, apparently can't tolerate criticism about the politicism of the court either. They apparently want America to be happy and content with gaslighting.
But I only have one quibble with what Joy said: the people won't lose their respect for the court at some point in the future. The future is already here. Only 40% of the people see the court as legitimate, and that number id falling.
So the court should not be shocked when the people disregard their decisions in the future, because they're publicly rendering themselves illegitimate now. Illegitimacy will ultimately lead to impotency.
Nothing is clearer regarding the momentum in that direction than the hundreds of thousands of women on the march over the weekend that ought to tell the court their legitimacy is on the line, if their hubris and their black robed fragile egos will permit them to pay attention.
I hate conspiracies, and don't really believe in coincidences, but this is weird. At the beginning of his term, Trump had a complete hard-on for ATT, so much so that he wanted DoJ to get involved in their deal to purchase Time-Warner.
As part of Trump's/DoJ's outrage, Time-Warner was forced to sell the Turner Unit, including CNN, which Trump hates, too. That was 2017. Until that point, OANN was pretty insignificant as media outlets go. So at what point did it become such a vocal pro-Trump propaganda outlet?
And because Trump almost immediately stopped discussing ATT, was some kind of deal offered concerning OANN by ATT to appease Trump? What happened? Was it coercion? Extortion? Bribery?
I understand why so many young people are turned off by politics, and why so many specifically hate the democrats.
But who can blame them? Many of us older folks keep insisting that for all of their problems, democrats are most likely to act on our behest, in our best interest.
Yet even many of us doubt that.
Look at the democratic party right now. How are we supposed to be believed, and how are they to be convinced, when we see members of our own party working directly against our interest, forcing us to negotiate with ourselves unnecessarily?
They force us into weak positions demanding that we squander our power and leverage to do good things for the people, while they preen, pose, profile, goof off, act like they're unaccountable, scrape money from donors, lobbyists, and from republicans.
If you can't or won't say why something it too big or too expensive, then you have no position, just a complaint with no basis or substance. What you've presented is a strawman because you're too dishonest to have a real debate of ideas, or you just want to conceal the truth.
That's what Manchin and Sinema have done. They are taking the identical positions now that the tea party took 10 years ago. They don't have specific disagreements on ANYTHING. They have done nothing and presented nothing.
They have no ideas and no constituency or caucus in congress. They're completely empty. Their power comes strictly from taking the position of saying NO pretending that conservative democratic ideology is most important, when their underlying interests are about ideology at all.
There was a time in this country when every baby was required to be born no matter the circumstances of it's conception - even rape or incest, regardless of whether that child was wanted or could be cared for, and regardless of whether the family survived or was broken up.
It was never a matter of love, caring, or family. The women were merely vessels, and the children were commodities and pawns for the purposes of others.
Those decisions were made and imposed by craven, evil, small white males who had only their base, lascivious, instincts and reprobate wants in mind, derived purely from their self-anointed sense superiority, privilege, and entitlement.
Sometimes it seems that history appears in strange mirror images. During the civil war, despite the democrats of the south seceding from the union, there were Unionist Democrats who sided with the republicans of the north, and some northern democrats aligned with the south.
But today, as republicans attempt to fracture the Union, it's duplicitous, unfaithful democrats who are siding with republicans. And while those democrats may deny it, their own actions underscore their lies and complicity.
And at the same time, there are former republicans who have given up on their failed party in favor of the democrats as the last best hope. I'd suspect that if this nation's and world survive our current challenges and crises, another reverse will occur.
Can you imagine a United States where every Black or Brown missing young girl (or boy) received the same coverage as Gabby Petito?
No, you can't.
You can't because it's never happened.
I have to be totally honest. I generally am, and that's what keeps me in trouble I suppose.
It is a horrible shame and a disgrace that young people go missing in this country - or anywhere else (the young people who show up in the US as sex slaves or child labor are someone's missing children from some other country.)
It's morally repugnantly and downright ugly that folks who pretend to be moral, upright and decent have demands, needs and appetites that perpetuate missing persons. It's their base, craven, evil demands that often drives this perpetual travesty whatever the reason.