If Henderson is essentially starting fires in our midfield - and I honestly don't know a more apt way to describe what happened against City - then surely the onus is on finding a way to stop that happening rather than complain that Fabinho isn't great when in a forest fire.
If you have Fabinho in your time - you already KNOW he isn't a lateral player. So if you are putting him in a team where he has to cover laterally because the rest of the midfield get caught ahead of the ball it is just setting him up to fail.
Hence why I said you cannot play
Fabinho + Henderson.
Fabinho isn't going to get better covering the pitch laterally. He just isn't a Mascherano or Kante. Same way as Alonso couldn't and was paired with a Masch or Sissoko.
If Masch/Sissoko's legs went and Alonso has to start covering the width of the pitch
you have a problem. The problem isn't Alonso though - it is the fact the person who is his 'legs' no longer has those legs. And I don't know if this is a temporary thing with Hendo or not - but his legs aren't getting him to where he needs to be right now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The unescapable reality of the Salah situation is:-
- We need to give him a new deal
* but doing so may mean pay bumps across the board and we may end up no longer having revenue to cover our wages
- Or we sell him in the summer
- Or we lose him for free the following summer.
Those are literally the only 3 options and people making out like it is a simple thing and just give him whatever are perhaps not considering the knockon effect.
Do guys like Virg, Ali, Trent, Hendo etc have parity clauses in their contract. Maybe not to be the highest earner
but to say that they never earn <75% what the highest earner does.
And even if not, does it create a problem when you come to renegotiate with guys like Firmino & Mane and new signings in the future. Suddenly the upper limit in wages isn't 200k but 500k+.
There is a narrative that Hendo was motm against Milan - and he just wasn't.
He was the match-winner for sure. But if I had to ask anybody to remember now what he did that match literally all you will remember is that goal - because that is how memory works. You remember those
big moments, particularly if they are anchored in a big emotion - the absolute joy of someone scoring a worldie to win a game. But that can't be literally the ONLY thing we consider judging motm.
And in truth he was the player who starts the chain reaction for us to
concede both goals. That isn't to say he is entirely at fault, or other players shouldn't have done better in their situations - just that his movement and positioning causes a collapse we never recover from.
First goal, he never presses the ball and the Milan player can take
Simple... instead of 2 midfielders trying to cover the width of the pitch, you have 3. So instead of Fabinho being the most-right midfielder and having to contest the ball on the right side of the box, and Jones needing to be near him to keep some shape in our system and fill the
gap behind him... Hendo is challenging where Fabinho is, or if Fabinho has already moved out, drops into the #6 spot and allows Jones to stay the left-CM and fill that half space.
Go back and watch the Brentford goal again - Hendo starts the play in a line with Jones. Ends up 30 yards behind play. Even the referee is moving quicker than him.
But worse, he isn't dropping back but moving laterally across the pitch stacking our midfield in a vertical line.
I love this from Klopp... but here is why you don't get this too often? Shit questions.
Journalists have a headline and then ask Klopp to confirm it. Or ask about transfers. Two things you can do with Klopp to shut the conversation down - they are closed questions. You are
telling Klopp EXACTLY the soundbite you are after from him and he ain't giving that to you.
Here... he gets asked a football question and asked to explain what the problem was.
He answered talking about football. Not transfers. Not depth. Not Trent backup.
He talks football.
And as we showed second half...we solved the problems in the first half with adjustment rather than change. Because as fans we only understand the game in terms of players. So to affect change you need to make changes. That means subs. That means transfers.
Also this will be the 3rd full 90 minutes in a week for Matip - assuming he completes the game. I can't remember the last time he did that. With the Int break it means he can rest before our next game mid-October.
I see a lot of people mentioning Grealish v Milner.
I would honestly be more worried if it was Sané. If it was Sane v Milner I'd be having a quiet little cry before kickoff. Or Gnabry. Anybody that has an insane amount of pace and the technical and tactical ability to hurt you