I see that a lot of people are misconstruing this piece. The point isn't 'oh manchin and sinema are going to cave and do a filibuster carve out. awesome.' Not at all. It's that if you look at where this is going we will soon be in a position where ... talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/are-we-…
2/ there isn't enough time left to use reconciliation. So I anticipate a situation where yes Democrats are falling over themselves to cave but they can't. Because there's nowhere to cave. Everybody is out of time. At that point there are three options.
3/ Default; Filibuster carveout or Republicans cave and allow Democrats to fix the issue through regular order. Option three won't happen because Republicans are legislative terrorists. So we have two options. And I simply hope default won't be what happens. I can't imagine ...
4/ Manchin and Sinema will allow the US to go into default over a rule change that wouldn't affect any legislation but could be done in a half hour and makes the whole problem go away. Not only is what I'm describing not an optimistic scenario or what I want to ...
5/ happen I wish Dems would cave right now and just deal with this through reconciliation. Why? Because the consequences of a debt default are just so unimaginably bad that I don't want to leave anything to chance. But soon everybody will be out of time and then it's ...
6/ either default or carveout. I guess I'm just a crazy optimistic and hoping it's option two.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshtpm

7 Oct
The current situation Cruz has created for his GOP colleagues captures the way that irresponsibility, the evasion of responsibility has become the centerpiece of GOP party ideology. The caucus is happy to allow Dems to do on their own what every GOP member knows MUST ...
2/ be done: pay the country's bills. They're willing to allow it if they don't have to touch the process. No fingerprints. But big preening dickwad Ted comes along and says I'm going to object. Now he's created a situation where 10 GOPs have to help overrule dickwad Ted.
3/ But it's proving super hard to find 10 because voting for what's technically called "cloture" - forcing Ted to sit the fuck down is in GOP logic basically just voting to raise the debt ceiling since it makes it possible for Democrats to vote to do it.
Read 5 tweets
7 Oct
Ozy is clearly an extreme case. But having been in this space a long time I'll tell you that virtually everything they're accused of is something that some big operations have done and in a lot of cases most of them have done. axios.com/ozy-medias-dee…
2/ I mean, lying about traffic and audience? LOL. Get in line. Building a round by a lead is in who isn't in? I mean, that's all but best practices in digital media VC world. Many times over the last decade I've had people ask me about this or that company, some times ...
3/ just out of curiosity, other times because they're potential investors in those companies or maybe they're partners or advertisers and I'll say well, this may be a promising investment but let's just be clear all the numbers are fake, ok? Like you know that, right?
Read 4 tweets
5 Oct
What I always come back to is that these things are close to inevitable when you combine machine learning, reactivity, depression and anxiety these kinds of things become almost inevitable. That's not a defense. It's inherent to the product.
2/ Looking at the responses here I’m struck again that people don’t really grasp what Facebook is, what the product is. It’s designed to find charged emotional topics and serve them specifically for you to maximize engagement.
3/ That’s more jarring when it’s serving weight loss tips and fat shaming content to teenage girls with body image insecurities. But it’s that same model for everybody. I think I know this more intuitively because it was literally my business for a long time to …
Read 10 tweets
3 Oct
@DineshDSouza Okay, just taking notes. So you agree abt the straw donations abt the mistress and her then-husband, correct? My understanding is that you made donations in yr wife's name and she accused you in a letter to the court of forging her name but that you weren't separately charged ...
@DineshDSouza 2/ with that crime? There were also the charged straw donations through an assistant? Is this an accurate summary?
@DineshDSouza If I'm understanding your meaning you mean that you made straw donations through yr wife, yr then-mistress, her then-husband and also an assistant. But you only pleaded guilty to the latter three crimes?
Read 5 tweets
2 Oct
The Times reporting really is “am I taking crazy pills” inducing experience. Let’s review, this entire thing is the package Biden proposed in the Spring. When it became clear that the package would be broken into two separate bills he backed linking them together, one wouldn’t …
2/ pass without the other. Pelosi explicitly said this. The President endorsed it to clearly he actually got in a nick of trouble by putting it a bit too directly in the press conference announcing, saying he’d veto the BIF if it came to his deck without the recon bill.
3/ Linkage has been the explicit policy and goal of all the leaders. The came under threat with the mix of the deadline extorted by Josh Gottheimer and the refusal of the senate holdouts to negotiate. And it seemed like they might have to pass the BIF and take good faith …
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct
Having crapped on the turbulent weasel Josh Gottheimer let me add that I actually think he's right in pushing for the return of the SALT deduction. Self-interest is obvious. He reps a very affluent district in North Jersey. That hit those folks pretty hard.
2/ For clarity Trump's tax cut actually raised taxes for a lot of people in Blue states. It ramped back the ability of people to deduct state taxes from their federal liability. I think a lot of progs have had this very wrong. Yes, the biggest benefits go to rich folks.
3/ But there's more here than just that and more here than just punishing blue states. By getting rid of the SALT deduction you undermine politic support for high tax/high benefit state government in Blue States. That's very shortsighted to say the least.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(