The current situation Cruz has created for his GOP colleagues captures the way that irresponsibility, the evasion of responsibility has become the centerpiece of GOP party ideology. The caucus is happy to allow Dems to do on their own what every GOP member knows MUST ...
2/ be done: pay the country's bills. They're willing to allow it if they don't have to touch the process. No fingerprints. But big preening dickwad Ted comes along and says I'm going to object. Now he's created a situation where 10 GOPs have to help overrule dickwad Ted.
3/ But it's proving super hard to find 10 because voting for what's technically called "cloture" - forcing Ted to sit the fuck down is in GOP logic basically just voting to raise the debt ceiling since it makes it possible for Democrats to vote to do it.
4/ So preening Ted is making 10 colleagues walk the plank into the deep vast ocean of RINOdom. Now remember, all 100 senators know the debt ceiling must be raised. The entire thing is an exercise if not taking responsibility for what you know has to happen.
5/ But here in the guys of preening dickwad Ted Cruz it's the snake of GOP preening recklessness eating itself.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ozy is clearly an extreme case. But having been in this space a long time I'll tell you that virtually everything they're accused of is something that some big operations have done and in a lot of cases most of them have done. axios.com/ozy-medias-dee…
2/ I mean, lying about traffic and audience? LOL. Get in line. Building a round by a lead is in who isn't in? I mean, that's all but best practices in digital media VC world. Many times over the last decade I've had people ask me about this or that company, some times ...
3/ just out of curiosity, other times because they're potential investors in those companies or maybe they're partners or advertisers and I'll say well, this may be a promising investment but let's just be clear all the numbers are fake, ok? Like you know that, right?
I see that a lot of people are misconstruing this piece. The point isn't 'oh manchin and sinema are going to cave and do a filibuster carve out. awesome.' Not at all. It's that if you look at where this is going we will soon be in a position where ... talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/are-we-…
2/ there isn't enough time left to use reconciliation. So I anticipate a situation where yes Democrats are falling over themselves to cave but they can't. Because there's nowhere to cave. Everybody is out of time. At that point there are three options.
3/ Default; Filibuster carveout or Republicans cave and allow Democrats to fix the issue through regular order. Option three won't happen because Republicans are legislative terrorists. So we have two options. And I simply hope default won't be what happens. I can't imagine ...
What I always come back to is that these things are close to inevitable when you combine machine learning, reactivity, depression and anxiety these kinds of things become almost inevitable. That's not a defense. It's inherent to the product.
2/ Looking at the responses here I’m struck again that people don’t really grasp what Facebook is, what the product is. It’s designed to find charged emotional topics and serve them specifically for you to maximize engagement.
3/ That’s more jarring when it’s serving weight loss tips and fat shaming content to teenage girls with body image insecurities. But it’s that same model for everybody. I think I know this more intuitively because it was literally my business for a long time to …
@DineshDSouza Okay, just taking notes. So you agree abt the straw donations abt the mistress and her then-husband, correct? My understanding is that you made donations in yr wife's name and she accused you in a letter to the court of forging her name but that you weren't separately charged ...
@DineshDSouza 2/ with that crime? There were also the charged straw donations through an assistant? Is this an accurate summary?
@DineshDSouza If I'm understanding your meaning you mean that you made straw donations through yr wife, yr then-mistress, her then-husband and also an assistant. But you only pleaded guilty to the latter three crimes?
The Times reporting really is “am I taking crazy pills” inducing experience. Let’s review, this entire thing is the package Biden proposed in the Spring. When it became clear that the package would be broken into two separate bills he backed linking them together, one wouldn’t …
2/ pass without the other. Pelosi explicitly said this. The President endorsed it to clearly he actually got in a nick of trouble by putting it a bit too directly in the press conference announcing, saying he’d veto the BIF if it came to his deck without the recon bill.
3/ Linkage has been the explicit policy and goal of all the leaders. The came under threat with the mix of the deadline extorted by Josh Gottheimer and the refusal of the senate holdouts to negotiate. And it seemed like they might have to pass the BIF and take good faith …
Having crapped on the turbulent weasel Josh Gottheimer let me add that I actually think he's right in pushing for the return of the SALT deduction. Self-interest is obvious. He reps a very affluent district in North Jersey. That hit those folks pretty hard.
2/ For clarity Trump's tax cut actually raised taxes for a lot of people in Blue states. It ramped back the ability of people to deduct state taxes from their federal liability. I think a lot of progs have had this very wrong. Yes, the biggest benefits go to rich folks.
3/ But there's more here than just that and more here than just punishing blue states. By getting rid of the SALT deduction you undermine politic support for high tax/high benefit state government in Blue States. That's very shortsighted to say the least.