There's famous Biblical parable where a master goes away for sometime and leaves talents to his servants. The last servant returns upon the masters arrival and says here is the talent you gave me. The master asks what did you do with it while I was away. The servant responds 1/n
I buried it. This seems like a perfect analogy for the first year of the Biden administration foreign policy focusing on China and generally the world at large. The closest thing there would be to a significant new movement is AUKUS but that was instigated by Australia 2/n
Everything else is just nibbling at the edges backwards or forwards of everything Trump. Biden policy on China to date is just Trump. That's it. Period. Couple minor steps forward and a couple minor steps back but basically nothing. What is even more astounding 3/n
Is not only has there not been any real movement in any direction, they have not even openly discussed or given anything but the vaguest of answers about what direction they want to be going on any of it. USTR talk yesterday. Was it good or bad on China? Totally depends on 4/n
on how you choose to read it. Talked for an hour or two and really said very little concrete of substance that advanced what we already knew. China isn't changing. Not really an insight. Tariffs, well we intend to keep them but change some of them but we don't really know yet 5/n
We are nearly one year into the Biden administration, one year since election day, and what is Biden China and more broadly foreign policy? Nobody could really give a concrete answer to that. Spin the plates and bury the talents and wait. Why does this matter? Simple: 6/n
You think China is standing still? Nope. You think Iran is standing still? Nope. I mean hell the geriatric Japanese are doing at least as much as we are. China is moving to decouple and we aren't even sure what we want to do much less how to achieve it. What compounds this 7/n
Is Team Biden are the self proclaimed smartest guys in the rooms. The experts. They spent the last four years in think tanks espousing their brilliance. What happens the first year they arrive? Nothing. Like nothing. They got basically nothing to show for year 1. Zilch. 8/n
The best that can really be said is they haven't really rolled much back. As I said a little back and a little forward but most everything is edge nibbling. Nothing. We aint' got the time for these guys to spin plates and play Risk for 4 years. Things are coming much faster.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Evergrande Turnaround CEO Balding 大老板

Evergrande Turnaround CEO Balding 大老板 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BaldingsWorld

4 Oct
There is an important aspect to understanding how money, ideas, universities, and think tanks work. When donors give money to a university or think for let's say a "China Center" (though pretty much applies to anything else) everyone involved is smart enough to avoid the 1/n
Paper trail in litigation that would wreck them. By that I mean the public statements and private contracts will all say the right things about respecting academic freedom, no strings attached to the money, that allows them to claim no influence from donors 2/n
Put another way, I've personally never witnessed nor heard credible evidence of an academic or think tank publishing something because they were told what to say or were contractually obligated. However, that does not absolve universities or think tanks because what happens 3/n
Read 12 tweets
27 Sep
Short thread on China electricity and epistemology. There is in all things a rush to impute motives or generate an understanding about a situation based upon pre-existing mental framework when the reality is we know very few facts about a situation. China electricity is great 1/n
I started hearing about this and other situations a few weeks ago but it made no sense why. There was no obvious reason why China should be facing electrical shortages. All of the narratives had glaring holes. It was only after talking to a number of people the pieces came 2/n
Together that was confirmed with multiple people. Now it is still important to note we really do not understand a lot here though the mechanics of the situation are clear. By that I mean, it is clear facts that end user price is fixed, generators buy basically at spot 3/n
Read 9 tweets
26 Sep
I am happy to criticize Biden or any one for that matter but in this Biden is absolutely right. Let's hit the highlights. 1. Quad can cooperate because they share values but also because they share interests on China. Whether it is moving supply chains 1/n politico.eu/article/us-joe…
Or improving security cooperation and capabilities. Europe fails on both accounts. They want to cooperate more with China and are unprepared to do most anything on security about any of the big authoritarian problems. Add n Europe is dysfunctional to a degree that nothing 2/n
Happens, one wonders what they even bring to the table or if they can accomplish anything. 2. The underlying complaint from Europe is a divergent view of how each side views multilateralism. Add I have emphasized repeatedly, multilateralism is not an ends but s means 3/n
Read 6 tweets
22 Sep
At the risk of touting my own research, let me explain how China does some of the crazy stuff it does in banking and capital markets to the uninitiated some of which comes from a paper I wrote 7 years ago now about some of the games they play 1/n papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
At least historically, when Chinese banks went public in Hong Kong they were stunningly honest in the IPO prospectuses probably because HK was still a pretty honest market, the lawyers were good, costs to non-compliance were not insignificant and they figured no one read them 2/n
Consequently, if you get hopped up enough on meth of get through 1,000+ pages you learn amazing stuff. The two things that I want to highlight here are what are Chinese lending standards and how do they bailout/disguise bad debt? Even most savy investors think these concepts 3/n
Read 17 tweets
20 Sep
I think there is an important definitional point that is taken for granted but shouldn't be about Evergrande. What do we mean by bailout? In the west we typically take it to mean a company is about the declare bankruptcy or collapse and the government steps up and writes 1/n
A big check to keep the company going. In China for many reasons, bail out needs to be defined much more broadly. What if a local SOE buys one of the unfinished developments at near historical investment cost. Is that a bail out? Likely yes. What if the government 2/n
Tells retail WMP holders they get nothing for redemption in the next 30 days but if they extend the duration 5 years and lower the interest rate, they will get paid off. Is that a bail out? Probably. What if a bad bank asset manager buys a loan from a mid size bank above 3/n
Read 8 tweets
17 Sep
I think the current state of journalism is awful because very few in the industry actually care about truth. It's 110% about selling a narrative and creating outrage. The Milley call to China is the PERFECT example of this. Follow me a second. 1/n
When it was first reported it was reported as part of an advance leak from a book (clue #1 to dig deeper). The initial report says Milley called around January 6th to tell China we would invade. Note how NOTHING revealed is technically false. It is so technically true 2/n
However, note as we proceed how by leaving out key facts it creates a very false picture of the actual events that intends to generate outrage playing to two different narratives. The first encouraged narrative was that Milley went rogue and yes the deep state was trying 3/n
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(