LOL. Adam Schiff spent 3 years lying that he had seen smoking gun evidence proving Trump colluded with Russia, only for Mueller to close his investigation saying no evidence established that.
So now Schiff, in his new book to fleece #Resistance liberals, says Mueller is senile:
For 3 years, when liberal journalists, Dem and SNL stars thought Mueller was Superman coming to imprison all their enemies, it was a moral crime to speak ill of the ex- FBI Director.
Soon as he exposed them all as frauds, it was open season: Mueller is a coward, now senile, etc.
Anyway, liberals now face a real dilemma over the next month: should they transfer their paychecks to Steve Schmidt and Rick Wilson for the next boat, or give it all to Adam Schiff?
Why is it OK for Adam Schiff to malign Robert Mueller as being so senile that he deserves pity, but it's not OK for people to observe the very noticeable cognitive decline of Joe Biden?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Democrats love the CIA, FBI, censorship and the corporate media:
GALLUP: "In all, 7% of U.S. adults say they have "a great deal" and 29% "a fair amount" of trust and confidence in newspapers, television and radio news reporting."
When is the last time you heard any corporate media outlet engage in self-critique to ask why this is happening?
The Latest CIA/Media Fraud: Claiming Cricket Mating Sounds are a Russian Sonic Microwave Attack
When you put this together, it's arguably the most unhinged and humiliating fraud they perpetrated: always with the same set of Russiagate/CIA "journalists":
For the last 5 years, the US has been drowned by deliberate, toxic disinformation: not from Trump boomers on FB or QAnon sites or alt-right teenagers on 4Chan, but the same axis of NBC/CNN/NYT/Atlantic propagandists who say what CIA orders them to. Just look at how they behave:
I don't really have words left to express how recklessly these outlets spread CIA lies and propaganda. Watch what NBC & @mitchellreports did to spread this lie.
Facebook "whistleblower" Frances Haugen is a vital media and political asset because she advances their quest for greater control over online political discourse.
Their aim is not to erode Facebook and Google's vast power but to *transfer* it to themselves for their own use.
There is no doubt, at least to me, that Facebook and Google are grave menaces. Along with Apple and Amazon, they have become classic monopolies.
But none of the anger or activism in Washington and among liberal outlets is about solving that. They want to be the overseers of it.
One of my favorite thinkers and writers in journalism, @MazMHussain, is interviewed by one of the most heterodox and provocative interviewers, @nassimtaliban, and the result is as good and nutritious as you'd expect. Highly recommended:
Just as a taste: here Maz explains his experience growing up with first-generation or second-generation immigrants, how they think about social issues, and the capacity (lack thereof) of corporate engineering propaganda to re-mold their views in accordance with liberal orthodoxy:
One more great passage: here's Maz on what it was like growing up in the post-9/11 west as a Pakistani Muslim, and the various costs and benefits that come from that. Please just read the whole interview so I don't have to bombard your feed with more excerpts:
Russell Brand made a video that went viral which cast doubt on the various Russiagate frauds propagated by corporate media, and also questioned the justness of vaccine mandates, and overnightmedia branded him mentally unwell, alt-right and desperate for cash. That's what they do.
I spoke with @jimmy_dore about the overnight attempt by industry rags and liberal outlets to destroy @rustyrockets. You can watch the full segment below, but the most important point is that these journalists are so (justly) hatred, they lost this power.
Ten years ago, if these digital liberal outlets and other corporate media united to attack you, it could harm you. Now, because of how widely despised they are, the opposite happens: it helps. And they know they're hated and nobody trusts them and that's why they're so bitter:
Just the latest episode in an endless line proving that the leading agitators for more censorship -- the prime enemies of free discourse in the US -- are employees of corporate media outlets. They don't just approve of the huge censorship wave. They're angry more isn't censored.
The fact that we're so accustomed to corporate journalists being the leading activists *for censorship* has normalized it and obscured how utterly warped and sick it is.
As I've said before, it'd be as if the leading cheerleaders for more cigarette smoking were cardiologists.
The only thing creepier than corporate journalists leading the demands for more online censorship by Big Tech is that the majority party in the DC is constantly issuing dictates to tech monopolies demanding more political censorship: