The US debate over Facebook regulation is mostly focused on the impact of dangerous, unmoderated hate speech inside the U.S. @SPP_FI raises important questions about global regulation of the hate speech giant.
The rest of the developed world barely gets any attention from @Facebook let alone the developing world, where it is huge and plays a significantly greater role in political communications than it does in the west.
In NZ in 2019, a lone Australian gunman killed 51 people on a rampage through two mosques in Christchurch, where I went to school. His shooting spree was streamed live on Facebook on thousands of pages and groups. It was far and away the largest terror event ever in NZ.
After the event, which was clearly orchestrated to have maximum impact for its target audience of white supremacists in the West, the numbers of copies of the video stream online was over a million. And months later copies of the video remained online.
The event led to the Christchurch Call, an event held in Paris of 2019, at which NZ's PM @jacindaardern called for the elimination of violent extremist content online. christchurchcall.com
As @SPP_FI says, the issue of violent extremist online content is one that is very real in Ethiopia. Decades of TPLF rule in which pitting ethnic groups against each other was part of the power control strategy has left deep scars.
I've seen numerous examples of violent extremist content since I have been following the crisis in Ethiopia - mostly on @Facebook. Much of this ontent is directed against Amhara by OLA and TPLF violent extremists both of which fit a definition of violent extremist movements.
Developing nations have almost no resources dedicated to moderation of content. Resources in rich western nations are also completely inadequate, but I doubt there is much expectation of moderation requests being addressed in Ethiopia.
I'd be interested to hear accounts of this.
Myanmar and the attacks on the Rohingya muslims are the poster child for @Facebook driven genocide, but the risk is much wider, and certainly very live in Africa and the Indian sub-continent.
Once the discussion reaches the point of actual regulation of @Facebook in the United States it is vital that the rest of the world is included in the design of regulations which address the objectives in the Christchurch Call.
This (2nd image) is what >> un.org/ruleoflaw/them… << the @UN says about the the need for Freedom of Information laws to be in place in nation states to protect freedom of expression as per the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
And this is a recent (2020) statement issued by the independent OHCHR [Office of the high commissioner of human rights] issued about the absence of implementation of Freedom of Information within UN institutions. ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/…
“The UN and many international organizations lack the kind of freedom of information policies that are increasingly the norm among governments,” - David Kaye said before presenting a new report to the UN General Assembly.
I'd love to know who @jack talked to when he visited Ethiopia and what they talked about?
The role of @Twitter in reversing the information warfare dominance of TPLF, based mostly on lies, and replacing it with narratives based on reality has been an outstanding success.
There are spectacular differences between the approaches applied by the TPLF's cyber corps and those of Ethiopia.
TPLF: trolling, lying, gaslighting, bland unspecific allegations.
ETHIOPIA: humour, amplifying, revealing, informing, investigating, thanking and politely rebuffing
On the news media side the TPLF maintain clear dominance however. They have put in a lot off effort with things like story fabrication and placement, engineered and carefully deployed leaks.
This oped is indicates that from the outset the war, the UN’s perspective on Tigray was divorced from reality.
TPLF attacks on multiple ENDF bases, killing 1000s of soldiers & officers, stealing heavy weaponry and attacking a neighboring state. Is not a “political dispute”.
I can only conclude from this intemperate and delusional account of recent history that Sir Mark Lowcock is anxious, that when the causes of the humanitarian disaster in Tigray are determined, they will be sheeted home to his leadership.
The expulsions are an affront. To the UN (and others). These are self inflicted wounds. And they reflect how this is conflict where Ethiopians are killing and raping Ethiopians. It is Ethiopia's leaders who are letting down Ethiopia.
Q1: Reuters - are you going to impose sanctions on Ethiopia?
A: The fact of the UNSC meeting today was an action. It was not an action that was easy to take. The US have tools at our disposal. It could be a resolution...
The appearance by @antonioguterres at the end of the meeting is perhaps the most striking bit of all of this.
"It is my duty to defend the honour of the United Nations," he said when asked about his "right of reply" at end.
VIDEO: (Beginning 2:36mins) media.un.org/en/asset/k17/k…
"The UN has no political agenda in Ethiopia. Our agenda is just one to support the Ethiopian people, Tigrayans, Amaharas, Afaris, Somalis, that have suffered so much. We cannot see people going on dying, because of bullets, because of hunger...
"... we need to do everything to stop this conflict. We need to do everything to ensure that humanitarian aid is distributed everywhere to everybody. We need to do everything for a dialogue to be established among Ethiopians to solve the problems in Ethiopia."